“‘Leading scholar’ at Harvard accused of fabricating findings in famous study on honesty: report”

BobPSU92

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
18,341
27,629
113
See the link below. From the article:

”According to a report from the New York Times, "reverberations" are going through the academic community as one of the leading scholars in behavioral psychology has been accused of fabricating findings in a major study on honesty.

The report claimed that the field of behavioral science, an area of research often seen with much "skepticism" from other scientists, "may have sustained its most serious blow yet" thanks to evidence showing that Francesca Gino of Harvard Business School may have fabricated results in "multiple studies."

One of these was a study on honesty done in 2012, the results of which have "been cited hundreds of times by other scholars" since.”



Please take this opportunity to remember that Penn State has a culture problem.
 

Nits1989

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2021
791
1,113
93
My Dad used the term “soft sciences” to describe stuff like sociology and psychology. It inadvertently caused me to place much greater emphasis on the “real” sciences and math. Over the course of working as an attorney, I often wished I’d have placed a little more emphasis on the basics of the “soft sciences” and human nature. I thought I would have saved myself a lot of grief. But now this…
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Bob78

JohnJumba

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
947
625
93
See the link below. From the article:

”According to a report from the New York Times, "reverberations" are going through the academic community as one of the leading scholars in behavioral psychology has been accused of fabricating findings in a major study on honesty.

The report claimed that the field of behavioral science, an area of research often seen with much "skepticism" from other scientists, "may have sustained its most serious blow yet" thanks to evidence showing that Francesca Gino of Harvard Business School may have fabricated results in "multiple studies."

One of these was a study on honesty done in 2012, the results of which have "been cited hundreds of times by other scholars" since.”



Please take this opportunity to remember that Penn State has a culture problem.
Filching things is the American way!😮
 

Jason1743

Well-known member
Oct 20, 2021
2,716
5,148
113
My Dad used the term “soft sciences” to describe stuff like sociology and psychology. It inadvertently caused me to place much greater emphasis on the “real” sciences and math. Over the course of working as an attorney, I often wished I’d have placed a little more emphasis on the basics of the “soft sciences” and human nature. I thought I would have saved myself a lot of grief. But now this…
Fraud is not limited to the “soft sciences.” More recently Elizabeth Holmes of Theranos fame went to jail for fraudulent bio medical claims.
 

BobPSU92

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
18,341
27,629
113
Fraud is not limited to the “soft sciences.” More recently Elizabeth Holmes of Theranos fame went to jail for fraudulent bio medical claims.

I missed the Grimes case at PSU. So we really do have a culture problem. At least my hate-us isn’t misplaced. That warms my heart.
 

BobPSU92

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
18,341
27,629
113
By the way, when looking at the Grimes case in that top-ten list, We Are…Amateurs! Misused funds? Pfft. No wonder it was last on the list. We can’t even unethical right.

I hate us even more.
 

LionJim

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
11,514
15,770
113
Please, you and your imaginary numbers. ;)
There are specific signs in ASL for “real,” “complex,” and “imaginary” which correspond to their ordinary non-mathematical English usage as adjectives. In mathematics, these words aren’t adjectives, they are just the traditional names we use to identify specific number systems. (There is nothing complex about the complex numbers, nothing imaginary about the imaginary numbers.) As a result, I would never use these signs while teaching and would instead fingerspell the words: “r-e-a-l numbers,” “c-o-m-p-l-e-x numbers,” “I-m-a-g-I-n-a-r-y numbers.” I was fastidious that way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bison13

ApexLion

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2021
4,214
7,219
113
There are specific signs in ASL for “real,” “complex,” and “imaginary” which correspond to their ordinary non-mathematical English usage as adjectives. In mathematics, these words aren’t adjectives, they are just the traditional names we use to identify specific number systems. (There is nothing complex about the complex numbers, nothing imaginary about the imaginary numbers.) As a result, I would never use these signs while teaching and would instead fingerspell the words: “r-e-a-l numbers,” “c-o-m-p-l-e-x numbers,” “I-m-a-g-I-n-a-r-y numbers.” I was fastidious that way.
Did you say something? ;) Just had a flashback to pre-calc and the salaciousness of polar curves or maybe I'm thinking of my teacher. Either way I was confused thus migrating to the soft sciences.