Looks like we're on the hook for $100K for storming the court last night. We should 100% deliver that fine directly to the SEC office in pennies. Just leave it sitting in the lobby. What a stupid rule.
pro...100%.so are you pro court storming or anti court storming?
pro...100%.
We need physical barriers between the fans and the court. This needs to be done out of an abundance of caution. A 10' high chain link fence between the first row of seats and the court should be the minimum required. If this proves ineffective, fans should not be allowed into an arena where a game is being played. Again, out of an abundance of caution.Gotcha. I don't really see the fuss over it. Fans have been storming the court forever. Have any players ever actually been injured?
We need physical barriers between the fans and the court. This needs to be done out of an abundance of caution. A 10' high chain link fence between the first row of seats and the court should be the minimum required. If this proves ineffective, fans should not be allowed into an arena where a game is being played. Again, out of an abundance of caution.
A moat, with sharks with laser beams attached to their heads, must surround the court.We need physical barriers between the fans and the court. This needs to be done out of an abundance of caution. A 10' high chain link fence between the first row of seats and the court should be the minimum required. If this proves ineffective, fans should not be allowed into an arena where a game is being played. Again, out of an abundance of caution.
A moat, with sharks with laser beams attached to their heads, must surround the court.
![]()
![]()
It's a poor tax. The Blue bloods will never storm the field/court. So they don't need to worry about it. It's ridiculous.Gotcha. I don't really see the fuss over it. Fans have been storming the court forever. Have any players ever actually been injured?
Need to have some well trained Skunks to spray people if they trespass on to the court.A 10' high chain link fence between the first row of seats and the court should be the minimum required.
Right. So because some schools know how to act after winning, it's a stupid rule?It's a poor tax. The Blue bloods will never storm the field/court. So they don't need to worry about it. It's ridiculous.
Right. So because some schools know how to act after winning, it's a stupid rule?
So is underage drinking.I'm with Lamont on this one. These are college kids and it's part of the college experience.
We could go the way of ''It's A Wonderful Life'' with the court opening and dumping them in the swimming pool.We need physical barriers between the fans and the court. This needs to be done out of an abundance of caution. A 10' high chain link fence between the first row of seats and the court should be the minimum required. If this proves ineffective, fans should not be allowed into an arena where a game is being played. Again, out of an abundance of caution.
So, would a three hundred pound man have to pay more than a one hundred pound woman?Actually, each person involved in rushing the court ought to be on the hook for his/her proportionate share of it. That would be the ultimate in appropriateness.
Good point. Get rid of fans entirely. There weren't any court stormings in 2020!!We need physical barriers between the fans and the court. This needs to be done out of an abundance of caution. A 10' high chain link fence between the first row of seats and the court should be the minimum required. If this proves ineffective, fans should not be allowed into an arena where a game is being played. Again, out of an abundance of caution.
No, but Siamese twins would each pay, regardless of what point at which they are conjoined.So, would a three hundred pound man have to pay more than a one hundred pound woman?