2026 Pre-Season Rankings

Oct 30, 2021
327
757
93
Let's do a little something different this year.

With all three services reporting their pre-season rankings I thought I would take a look at expectations.

Saturday Night's Alright For Fighting

Get a little action in.

Let's start with expected finalists. The three services see lineups and weights a bit different at this early stage, but who cares. Let's make some reckless predictions.

These are all the teams that have at least a 50/50 shot at one finalist in at least one service.

image.png.e87248a187e48476a47ce01e06cfcf2d.png

One thing to note is that Intermat and Wrestlestat only rank 9 PSU wrestlers, and yet they have higher expected finalists.

Everyone's All-American

Sticking with the same roster of teams, what does the prospect for All-Americans look like?

image.png.e85919cc32a47384b5b32e13c116922a.png



It is interesting to see Iowa State leapfrog Nebraska and Iowa here.
 
Last edited:

pish69

Senior
Jan 11, 2016
509
550
93
How you come up with expected finalist? Don’t we have like 5 or 6 guys ranked 1 or 2?
 
Oct 30, 2021
327
757
93
How you come up with expected finalist? Don’t we have like 5 or 6 guys ranked 1 or 2?
Using data from the 16 and 33 seed era (2014-2025) I calculate the probability of place by seed (my model fits the data in multiple directions).

By assuming the rankings equal the seeds (they won't) I can calculate the odds of each possible outcome.

For example, the model spits out a #1 seed is expected to make the finals just under 73% of the time. So a #1 rank is good for 0.73 expected finalists. And a #2 seed makes the final about 48% of the time. And so on.

Then based on these rankings:

1759890338757.png

I calculate these expected finalists:

1759890464759.png
 

El_Jefe

All-Conference
Oct 11, 2021
1,544
4,344
113
Let's clear this up: Ono is a national champion regardless of what weight he goes at.
I'd like to think so, and he'll definitely be the best on feet, but we still have no idea how he'll be on bottom.

We'll find out a lot in the Lehigh dual against Crookham or Stanich. Crookham especially is very strong and tough on top. If he's at 141, Mendez is really good on top too.

If he's merely adequate on bottom, then yeah, he's a national champ. If he has Buckeye-level bottom defense, it'll be a lot harder.
 

Corby2

Senior
Jul 14, 2025
257
503
93
I'd like to think so, and he'll definitely be the best on feet, but we still have no idea how he'll be on bottom.

We'll find out a lot in the Lehigh dual against Crookham or Stanich. Crookham especially is very strong and tough on top. If he's at 141, Mendez is really good on top too.

If he's merely adequate on bottom, then yeah, he's a national champ. If he has Buckeye-level bottom defense, it'll be a lot harder.
And the plan was to RS unless he got 2 years. Blaze is the 133
 

Joejitsu

Redshirt
Jun 10, 2025
42
32
18
I feel like 3 potential finalist is really conservative for us. Mitch- Levi and Josh are the three minimum... but i dont think it is going out on a limb to suggest that Luke / Kasak(or PJ) and SVN could also be finalists. Heck... TBH... if Kasak, SVN or even Luke for that matter dont finish in the top 3 it would be a big disappointment... So 6 finalists is really a reasonable expectation!
 

a_mshaffer

Freshman
Dec 8, 2014
78
74
18
I feel like 3 potential finalist is really conservative for us. Mitch- Levi and Josh are the three minimum... but i dont think it is going out on a limb to suggest that Luke / Kasak(or PJ) and SVN could also be finalists. Heck... TBH... if Kasak, SVN or even Luke for that matter dont finish in the top 3 it would be a big disappointment... So 6 finalists is really a reasonable expectation!
easier to say semi-finalist as some could easily get a bad draw and trip up in the semi's (Josh). 7-8 Semi's is reasonable (and now expected! :) )
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joejitsu

Joejitsu

Redshirt
Jun 10, 2025
42
32
18
easier to say semi-finalist as some could easily get a bad draw and trip up in the semi's (Josh). 7-8 Semi's is reasonable (and now expected! :) )
agreed... can you imagine the meltdown brands or manning will have if we end up with 8 in the semis LOL
 
Oct 30, 2021
327
757
93
easier to say semi-finalist as some could easily get a bad draw and trip up in the semi's (Josh). 7-8 Semi's is reasonable (and now expected! :) )
I am traveling and didn't bring my computer. Now you are making me regret that decision. Oh well, I will give you the answer next week.
 

El_Jefe

All-Conference
Oct 11, 2021
1,544
4,344
113
easier to say semi-finalist as some could easily get a bad draw and trip up in the semi's (Josh). 7-8 Semi's is reasonable (and now expected! :) )
Throw in Cael's record in the semis, and you two are saying the same thing.
 

SJP80

Redshirt
Oct 12, 2021
18
28
13
Would it be more accurate to look at PSUs #1 and #2 seeds and calculate the % of times they become finalists as opposed to using the whole population? I suspect our #1 and #2's fail less than the overall population.
 
Oct 30, 2021
327
757
93
Would it be more accurate to look at PSUs #1 and #2 seeds and calculate the % of times they become finalists as opposed to using the whole population? I suspect our #1 and #2's fail less than the overall population.
In theory yes, but in practice you wind up with very small samples sizes across the board, making it sketchy to model for most seeds. And remember that only two #1 seeds have failed to AA in the past decade, and one was from PSU. Though I am not sure how much that impacts the narrower top 2 criteria.

You also assume there will be no mean reversion, but last year we did see that in the semis.

I have calculated an estimate for the PSU bump in the past and will probably re-work that with 2025 results included.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Psalm 1 guy