Toggle sidebar

3 permanents for SEC teams

R

ronpolk

Well-known member
May 6, 2009
8,119
2,609
113
Yeah, I’ll take it. Good for us and OM gets to drop an annual game against vandy
 
IBleedMaroonDawg

IBleedMaroonDawg

Well-known member
Nov 12, 2007
23,117
7,127
113
Everyone has tough teams, and everyone has teams they can compete with. Looks like they did a pretty good job to me.
 
bullygrowl

bullygrowl

Member
Sep 29, 2022
97
184
33
The Oklahoma Florida seems odd. The rest looks like the best that could be done.
 
P

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
48,349
11,996
113
Looks like not official, but as plugged in as Dellenger is, you have to think he's not just throwing out guesses here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QuaoarsKing
greenbean.sixpack

greenbean.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2012
6,114
4,680
113
I'd sign up for that today. Would rather not have to go to College Station (terrible trip) but very happy with the other two.
 
greenbean.sixpack

greenbean.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2012
6,114
4,680
113
The Barn gets the big green weenie. They get the two titans of the conference. Wonder it Jimmy Rane and the other big boosters are in favor?
 
bullygrowl

bullygrowl

Member
Sep 29, 2022
97
184
33
Moondawgg said:
Errbody cheering now until they find out our other six conference games in year one are Bama, LSU, Texas, Oklahoma, Florida, & Georgia
Click to expand...
So true. Even if you took the next bottom six our schedule would be: AtM, Ole Miss, UK, Mizz, USC, Florida, Auburn, Vandy, UT. I don't like that one either. That would be our dream schedule, but still tougher than any other team not in the SEC.
 
J

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,233
2,459
113
dorndawg said:
Looks fair to me
Click to expand...
Looks reasonably close to as fair as they can get it. I will say Missouri may not belong, but they either suck a mean dick or have a golden horseshoe up their *** with respect to scheduling since joining the SEC. Two years where they beat one team with a winning SEC record and they made it to two SEC championship games? And now they draw Oklahoma, Vandy, and Arkansas? If you have to have a "blue blood", you want Oklahoma, Texas, or A&M. Then they get Vandy and Arkansas. Only 3 out of six games, so not quite as big of a deal as before, but you have to be happy with that if you're missouri. Is there a single team you'd trade out for Arkansas right now? UK or USCe would maybe be comparable, but probably go with Arkansas and Sam Pittman without Briles at this point, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog
J

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,233
2,459
113
bullygrowl said:
So true. Even if you took the next bottom six our schedule would be: AtM, Ole Miss, UK, Mizz, USC, Florida, Auburn, Vandy, UT. I don't like that one either. That would be our dream schedule, but still tougher than any other team not in the SEC.
Click to expand...
9 game SEC is just going to be brutal however you do it. We're probably going to be hating that P5 OOC opponent. I'd be fine going with 2 G5 and an FCS as soon as we can. Or even just three G5 teams. The SEC schedule is going to give us our fill I think. Just an idea of what an "evenly" split schedule will look like for us if we rotate the 6 non-permanents every two years is below. We'll basically play 5 teams a year that absolutely blow us away in resources. Plus in half those years we'll hvae 5 away games and 4 homes games.


Year 1 & 2 Year 3&4
BamaUGA
LSUAuburn
FloridaUtenn
TexasOklahoma
A&MA&M
UmissUmiss
ArkansasUSCE
UKUK
MissouVandy
 
Last edited:
P

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
48,349
11,996
113
Moondawgg said:
Errbody cheering now until they find out our other six conference games in year one are Bama, LSU, Texas, Oklahoma, Florida, & Georgia
Click to expand...
Who you get as permanent isn't as big of a deal as it always has been when you're playing everyone else every other year anyway. We'll probably get 3 of those 6 every year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: drumrcraig
dorndawg

dorndawg

Well-known member
Sep 10, 2012
7,008
5,114
113
johnson86-1 said:
Looks reasonably close to as fair as they can get it. I will say Missouri may not belong, but they either suck a mean dick or have a golden horseshoe up their *** with respect to scheduling since joining the SEC. Two years where they beat one team with a winning SEC record and they made it to two SEC championship games? And now they draw Oklahoma, Vandy, and Arkansas? If you have to have a "blue blood", you want Oklahoma, Texas, or A&M. Then they get Vandy and Arkansas. Only 3 out of six games, so not quite as big of a deal as before, but you have to be happy with that if you're missouri. Is there a single team you'd trade out for Arkansas right now? UK or USCe would maybe be comparable, but probably go with Arkansas and Sam Pittman without Briles at this point, right?
Click to expand...
Honestly, I forget Missouri is in the SEC
 
Ranchdawg

Ranchdawg

Well-known member
Dec 13, 2012
3,103
2,258
113
  • Like
Reactions: Anon1664516582
DAWGSANDSAINTS

DAWGSANDSAINTS

Well-known member
Oct 10, 2022
1,677
1,429
113
Probably redo it all over again in 3 years.
I’d rather have AU than A&M but that’s just me
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login
Top Bottom