![www.on3.com](https://on3static.com/uploads/dev/assets/cms/2022/07/20121523/51965991044_e428281f9f_k.jpg)
Aliyah Boston responds to ESPY snub
Gamecock WBB star Aliyah Boston responded on social media on Wednesday to her not being invited to the 2022 ESPYs.
Don't you like the covid excuse - always works well when you can't come up with anything else.![]()
Aliyah Boston responds to ESPY snub
Gamecock WBB star Aliyah Boston responded on social media on Wednesday to her not being invited to the 2022 ESPYs.www.on3.com
I agree. That's a super lame excuse. I'm with Dawn on this one. Something is fishy.Don't you like the covid excuse - always works well when you can't come up with anything else.
With NIL students can now have agents. Her agent is Alex English daughter.I saw her "agent" made a comment about it. College players can have agents now?
Sometimes things don't go your way. It's not called racism, it's called life! Get over it, **** HAPPENS!
Combined with an excuse about being at a smaller venue with less capacity than previous venues. I mean, it's not like ESPN has any control over which venues they use, right? This was, literally, and act of God. Who could have possibly known they had chosen a venue that wasn't even big enough to invite all of their own nominees?Don't you like the covid excuse - always works well when you can't come up with anything else.
There were 3 nominees.....Boston, the girl from OU that won, and a soccer player from FSU that is white and also was not invited. So claiming racism obviously does not look good.With all due respect to Aliyah I don't think she was wise with a response like that. She's claiming racism by ESPN over this.
Check out the winners, particularly the category she was nominated for.
And I still believe she should have been invited for her achievements. I have no idea how many others didn't receive invitations that were nominated.
Actually there were 4 nominees in her category:There were 3 nominees.....Boston, the girl from OU that won, and a soccer player from FSU that is white and also was not invited. So claiming racism obviously does not look good.
There were 3 nominees.....Boston, the girl from OU that won, and a soccer player from FSU that is white and also was not invited. So claiming racism obviously does not look good.
Alo was invited but not to accept or speak. Last year all finalists were invited and the winner Bueckers spoke. At the least ESPN deemed Bueckers as moving the needle more than any of this year’s finalistsThe winner, Alo, isn't white. Was she invited to be there in person?
Alo was invited but not to accept or speak. Last year all finalists were invited and the winner Bueckers spoke. At the least ESPN deemed Bueckers as moving the needle more than any of this year’s finalists
If Alo accepted and spoke your point might have credenceWell, I guess you have to race and gender off the table then as Alo is both a female and a minority and she was invited.
If Alo accepted and spoke your point might have credence
No not really. They only invited the winner this year and did not give her an opportunity to accept the award or speak. Last year all 3 finalists were invited and the winner, Bueckers, spoke and was heavily promoted after the event. Alo.... nothing.But she, as a female minority, was invited to attend in person. Boston's contention is that she was not invited because she is a female minority. Alo's invitation disproves that entirely.
No not really. They only invited the winner this year and did not give her an opportunity to accept the award or speak. Last year all 3 finalists were invited and the winner, Bueckers, spoke and was heavily promoted after the event. Alo.... nothing.
The category was treated very differently this year. Was this racial? I don’t know. Was it the perception that Bueckers moves the meter and the 3 this year didn’t ? Again I don’t know. I do know all 3 males got invited and got air time both years.
To me it says ESPN made choices for time, budget and perceived viewership. And in no great shocker, women were the first ones cut from the agenda
If you cannot see and acknowledge that the category of female college athlete was treated differently this year and that it directly affected Boston then you are just willfully ignoring reality.How does Candace Parker factor into the equation? Black. Female. Invited. Spoke.
If you cannot see and acknowledge that the category of female college athlete was treated differently this year and that it directly affected Boston then you are just willfully ignoring reality.
Candace Parker was not nominated in the female college category which is what we are discussing
No, you’ve clearly lost the discussion on Boston and now want to change the framework of the discussionI'm responding to the claims that the snub was based on race and gender.
No, you’ve clearly lost the discussion on Boston and now want to change the framework of the discussion
Combined with an excuse about being at a smaller venue with less capacity than previous venues. I mean, it's not like ESPN has any control over which venues they use, right? This was, literally, and act of God. Who could have possibly known they had chosen a venue that wasn't even big enough to invite all of their own nominees?
For example, Cameron Brink from Stanford got and invite, and she was not nominated for any awards. She was not the best player on her own team, much less the nation. Did she get an invite just because she was "prittier"?There are a total of 159 nominees for the 2022 ESPYs. The Dolby Theatre in LA has a seating capacity of 3,400. Seems like ESPN could have found someone out of the other 3,241 to ask not to attend, over any of the the actual nominees that the entire event is supposed to be for.......
Two girls in a bar, ones a better cook and a better housekeeper. The other is prettier, which one gets your number?For example, Cameron Brink from Stanford got and invite, and she was not nominated for any awards. She was not the best player on her own team, much less the nation. Did she get an invite just because she was "prittier"?
What does this have to do with Boston's situation?Two girls in a bar, ones a better cook and a better housekeeper. The other is prettier, which one gets your number?
Because he asked if the other one got invited just because she was prettier.What does this have to do with Boston's situation?
The one that renounced her pretty and moves to the slumbs.Two girls in a bar, ones a better cook and a better housekeeper. The other is prettier, which one gets your number?
You really are as dumb as a box of rocks.Because he asked if the other one got invited just because she was prettier.
Sure, that's one option. OR . . . since they are ESP freakin' N, the same organization that can literally rearrange the first week of games on the college football schedule, maybe they could have picked a bigger venue? It's not like they don't have a lot of contacts in the venue-operating world.There are a total of 159 nominees for the 2022 ESPYs. The Dolby Theatre in LA has a seating capacity of 3,400. Seems like ESPN could have found someone out of the other 3,241 to ask not to attend, over any of the the actual nominees that the entire event is supposed to be for.......
Crying racism is the new crying wolf.With all due respect to Aliyah I don't think she was wise with a response like that. She's claiming racism by ESPN over this.
Check out the winners, particularly the category she was nominated for.
And I still believe she should have been invited for her achievements. I have no idea how many others didn't receive invitations that were nominated.
Racist and woke? Not sure I follow.espn is a racist woke **** box and the conversation can end there if we'd like.
What say ye?
We are close, if ESPN is going to have an award show it is bush league not to invite all the nominees.All this hullabaloo is over a sports award show. Nevertheless...
Was it a mistake by ESPN not to invite the female college player of the year? Sure.
Is there any hint, however of minor, that the decision was race or gender-based, as Boston alleges? No. ESPN is among the most progressive organizations that exists.
Actually the venue seats the same amount as last year, 3400. So it was just another ESPN lie to cover their tracks.Sure, that's one option. OR . . . since they are ESP freakin' N, the same organization that can literally rearrange the first week of games on the college football schedule, maybe they could have picked a bigger venue? It's not like they don't have a lot of contacts in the venue-operating world.