Well... at some point, that 58% is likely going to include somebody that works in the athletic department in some form, even if it's not the players directly.What's the scandal? Hell, my friends and I were doing this almost 30 years ago. But, you did have to pick up the phone.
I'm "betting" (pun intended) it was nowhere near 58% of the student population then. We had to p/u the phone too almost 40 years ago and on pay day (winner or loser) had to go out to Johnny's house in Green Oaks to settle up.What's the scandal? Hell, my friends and I were doing this almost 30 years ago. But, you did have to pick up the phone.
Again, this has been going on as long as there has been sports wagering. Checkout the Hedake Smith documentary if you haven't seen it. It's pretty good.Well... at some point, that 58% is likely going to include somebody that works in the athletic department in some form, even if it's not the players directly.
Right. But I have 2 kids that fit in this survey. They and all their friends wager. Literally $10/game. I doubt they will be able to influence a player into throwing a game.I'm "betting" (pun intended) it was nowhere near 58% of the student population then. We had to p/u the phone too almost 40 years ago and on pay day (winner or loser) had to go out to Johnny's house in Green Oaks to settle up.
Up though the 90s, there was a Hinds Co Deputy who ran a very public bookie operation at the bar at Martins in downtown Jxn.What's the scandal? Hell, my friends and I were doing this almost 30 years ago. But, you did have to pick up the phone.
Prime ages when you're trying to prove you're smarter than everyone else.