and I think his theory may be one that may have more legs than you'd think.
I've thought about the interplay of culture between your average recruit from inner city Jackson, New Orleans, or Atlanta once he gets to Oxford, Morgantown, Auburn or Starkville. For the most part, it's not like they're just going to immediately take up crappie fishing at Enid Lake as a hobby, suddenly love to squirrel hunt, or start taping Panic shows and discussing set lists at Bonnaroo because they move to a place that is largely an enclave for rural and suburban youth. If you bring in five guys from NOLA, and one of them in addition to being a marginal FB player is also loosely connected to drugs, violence, etc. often times through little direct fault of his own, do you think his tendency to be involved in stuff like that just wains? Where does his influence become a detritment to what, in the instances of Starkville and Oxford, are relatively low drug traffic and safe communities. If you're a punk, you're not gonna just become a Campus Crusader because suddenly you're not in the ghetto. You think Brown and Wesley, for instance, suddenly became 2nd Amendment proponents after they moved to Starkville?
Read Feldman's book about the disastrous reign of terror that Orgeron wrought on Ole Miss football or the Lewis book about Oher and you'll clearly see that alot of these young men (notice I didn't say "kids") are woefully unprepared for college life, whether the subjects are academic or social.