We sponsor the minimum number of sports required to be FBS. We wont be dropping anything unless the NCAA relaxes that requirement.No more Jav U?
Shirley our speed walking team will remain intact?
Communism! Yea!I hope Title IX lawyers blow this NIL crap to smitherines suing for $10 Trillion! A full blown class action suit against ALL 134 FBS schools. Shut it down until it goes back to amateur Student Athletes and each sport gets a flat amount to spend on staffs! I want the entire FBS to become the IVY League! That way, everybody's defense will be as bad as ours!****
I fully expect the requirement to be lowered. At least for most schools.We sponsor the minimum number of sports required to be FBS. We wont be dropping anything unless the NCAA relaxes that requirement.
They won't cut women's sportsI fully expect the requirement to be lowered. At least for most schools.
I bet they will. Not as much as they cut men's sports (or at least no more than men's sports), but they will cut them. If I cut 20 men's scholarships and 10 women's, I've actually improved my Title IX compliance.They won't cut women's sports
I'd like to see some details too. I bet it's not quite as bad as the article suggests, but still, it's a big concern going forward.I think it’s weird that he didn’t name a single program eliminating school in that article.
Agree. We are going to figure out any way forward to stay in the Big 2, with all sports.We sponsor the minimum number of sports required to be FBS. We wont be dropping anything unless the NCAA relaxes that requirement.
Mutt has returned!Really save money, get rid of title 9, and cut all women’s sports. Nothing wrong with club sports model.
It's not that there's nothing wrong with the club sports model. That's the ideal model. For profitable sports, nothing wrong with having scholarships and compensating players and coaches. For everything else, it should be basically just another extra curricular activity. Maybe some money made available to them just like other student activities, but basically supported by the players that want to participate.Really save money, get rid of title 9, and cut all women’s sports. Nothing wrong with club sports model.
I think it’s weird that he didn’t name a single program eliminating school in that article.
Not unless your school enrollment is 2/3 women.I bet they will. Not as much as they cut men's sports (or at least no more than men's sports), but they will cut them. If I cut 20 men's scholarships and 10 women's, I've actually improved my Title IX compliance.
You've got it backwards. You improve your compliance unless your school is >2/3 men.Not unless your school enrollment is 2/3 women.
Title IX compliance is about mirroring the school's distribution. Mostly male schools like The Citadel and VMI don't even play women's basketball because they'd have to balance it out with 60 or so more men's scholarships.
I'm guessing they have major sponsors to help with that.Hopefully our Bass Fishin' and Bow Huntin' teams make the cut.
The FBS schools didn't do this. The same lawyers who would be suing for title IX did this.I hope Title IX lawyers blow this NIL crap to smitherines suing for $10 Trillion! A full blown class action suit against ALL 134 FBS schools. Shut it down until it goes back to amateur Student Athletes and each sport gets a flat amount to spend on staffs! I want the entire FBS to become the IVY League! That way, everybody's defense will be as bad as ours!****
I actually don’t mind women’s curling. Not sure if any schools up north have this. In fact I wouldn’t even mind coaching this hobby. One of the only times in today’s feminist society I could yell “Sweep harder!” at a woman and no one would pretend to get their panties in a wad.Is this just indicative of the decline in popularity of Olympic sports?
I think he's assuming you were in compliance using the breakdown of the student body (which I think is technically one of three methods for showing compliance but basically the only one schools feel safe using). If you were in "perfect" compliance and had roster spots exactly in proportion to the student population, you'd actually risk an alleged violation of Title IX by having too few men's spots if you went around cutting schollies at a 2:1 ratio of men's scholarships to women's scholarships.You've got it backwards. You improve your compliance unless your school is >2/3 men.
And probably drink beer, etc.I actually don’t mind women’s curling. Not sure if any schools up north have this. In fact I wouldn’t even mind coaching this hobby. One of the only times in today’s feminist society I could yell “Sweep harder!” at a woman and no one would pretend to get their panties in a wad.