Happens every year during the summer when there's not much going on in college sports.I think they are trying to yank somebody's chain on this.
Since rumors are encouraged, Florida State and Clemson to Big 12. Don't know how legit.
I can't imagine how that helps them unless the big 12 lets them take a higher share of revenue than the other schools.Isn't the ACC revenue situation better than the Big 12?
The two biggest shake ups in recent conference history both were announced in the summer.Happens every year during the summer when there's not much going on in college sports.
One source, however, cautioned “never say never” about FSU going to the Big Ten because there could be a path if the ACC disintegrates.
“There is no appetite among the presidents unless there is some catastrophic development with the ACC and it forces [the Big Ten] into a decision,” the source said.
If FSU has been a disruptive partner, what the 17 has Texas been?Disruptive partner? Never heard that one before. I would definitely buy it though. They seem to think they are bigger than they really are
Yeah, and no one even knew about it until it happened either.The two biggest shake ups in recent conference history both were announced in the summer.
If FSU has been a disruptive partner, what the 17 has Texas been?
That would make the comments on Finebaum (I think) yesterday saying UNC was the prize for the SEC make more sense. I was wondering why anyone would say that, unless the instate schools are somehow successfully blocking Clemson and FSU.Since rumors are encouraged, Florida State and Clemson to Big 12. Don't know how legit.
If FSU has been a disruptive partner, what the 17 has Texas been?
The Big 12 has been floating the idea of selling a piece of itself to a private equity firm for a few weeks now, just like the idea they could be the "Mutual of Omaha 12" or whatever. The theory is that some of the money from that sale could be used to float Clemson and Florida a lifeline that pays for some or all of their grant of rights termination/exit fee and, in return, they join the Big 12 for the duration of the current Big 12 media deal, which runs until 2031 (five years shorter than the ACC).No way the SEC and Big 10 let that happen. Not to mention that pesky Grant of Rights agreement. The same kind of agreement that kept Texas and Oklahoma in the Big 12 2 years longer than all the talking heads thought they would.
Other than the fact that Private Equity is usually terrible for whatever Private Equity is investing in.The Big 12 has been floating the idea of selling a piece of itself to a private equity firm for a few weeks now, just like the idea they could be the "Mutual of Omaha 12" or whatever. The theory is that some of the money from that sale could be used to float Clemson and Florida a lifeline that pays for some or all of their grant of rights termination/exit fee and, in return, they join the Big 12 for the duration of the current Big 12 media deal, which runs until 2031 (five years shorter than the ACC).
It gives the Big 12 a couple of much-needed brand names and gives Florida State and Clemson a way out of the ACC (and potentially in a better position to make themselves available to the Big Ten or SEC) 5-6 years earlier than, for example, North Carolina or Miami.
I used to think it was pretty far-fetched, but if the Big 12 really is securing some outside funding, it actually doesn't sound like a bad deal to everybody involved.
They're comparable and both in the $40-$45 million per school range, but the ACC is eating itself from the inside with members that are actively trying to leave and/or kill the conference. Meanwhile, the Big 12 is stable, in a position to grow, and willing to think outside the box to expand revenue. The Big 12 media rights deal also ends 5 years before the ACC's, so they'll be in a better position to negotiate.Isn't the ACC revenue situation better than the Big 12?
The question is, why is it eating itself from the inside? If the revenue is the same, the conference profile of the ACC is better on paper, what are they doing? Leaving for the Big 12 makes no sense.They're comparable and both in the $40-$45 million per school range, but the ACC is eating itself from the inside with members that are actively trying to leave and/or kill the conference. Meanwhile, the Big 12 is stable, in a position to grow, and willing to think outside the box to expand revenue. The Big 12 media rights deal also ends 5 years before the ACC's, so they'll be in a better position to negotiate.
It's the length of the media rights. They have no opportunity to make more than they do now for another 12 years. If they can into the Big 12, they can shorten that timeline by 5-6 years either with a renewed Big 12 media rights contract (the Big 12 will have at least 1 more renewal before the ACC) or they fulfill their dream of making it to the SEC or Big Ten.The question is, why is it eating itself from the inside? If the revenue is the same, the conference profile of the ACC is better on paper, what are they doing? Leaving for the Big 12 makes no sense.
I still think the SEC should take FSU and Clemson whenever it’s feasible to do it (ie the next major round of realignment and it’s cheaper to leave ACC). It’s easy for the SEC to act high and mighty now that things are calm. And don’t get me started on them being a trouble maker while we went and got Texas.It's the length of the media rights. They have no opportunity to make more than they do now for another 12 years. If they can into the Big 12, they can shorten that timeline by 5-6 years either with a renewed Big 12 media rights contract (the Big 12 will have at least 1 more renewal before the ACC) or they fulfill their dream of making it to the SEC or Big Ten.
I agree on Florida State and probably Clemson. This move to the Big 12 would theoretically expedite their ability to make that move.I still think the SEC should take FSU and Clemson whenever it’s feasible to do it (ie the next major round of realignment and it’s cheaper to leave ACC). It’s easy for the SEC to act high and mighty now that things are calm. And don’t get me started on them being a trouble maker while we went and got Texas.
It’d be a good long term play. Strong football programs, big fanbases and good regional rivalries.
Exactly. SEC and Big 10 are perfectly content to wait 5 years before they fight over the top ACC schools. But if FSU can somehow get out of the GOR, it’s on. You’ll see 4-8 ACC schools to those 2 conferences. Big 12 can take the scraps.Nobody’s going to say “yeah, we’re definitely interested in adding a school that’s currently locked down for 10 years and is in the midst of a lawsuit against its own league”.
A lot will change for them over the coming years.