Levee is making 2025 his "make or break" year. Had he fired him, Levee would probably be "guaranteed" year three.
"You can fire him now or I'll fire you both later if it doesn't work out."Levee is making 2025 his "make or break" year. Had he fired him, Levee would probably be "guaranteed" year three.
I just don't know if two consecutive losing seasons will get you to a third. Not in this day in age, regardless of staff. If this year isn't a make year, I don't see him retained. The big question is though, what defines a "make" year.Levee is making 2025 his "make or break" year. Had he fired him, Levee would probably be "guaranteed" year three.
5-7, Def scoring efficiency under 70th.I just don't know if two consecutive losing seasons will get you to a third. Not in this day in age, regardless of staff. If this year isn't a make year, I don't see him retained. The big question is though, what defines a "make" year.
Concur, our schedule is beyond brutal again. 5 wins would be great. If Saban somehow became our coach next year he'd have a hard time winning 5. Where is Keenum when these schedules are made?5-7, Def scoring efficiency under 70th.
Every State fan thinks we've got a train wreck lol. Difference is, good coaches don't keep guys who run one of the worst units in college football. We could've fired Turner, who truly deserves it, and that would've calmed some stuff too.Selmon ain't firing Lebby until after year 3 minimum. Probly not even then. Selmon is not looking at this team thru maroon colored glasses. He knows it was and still is a train wreck. Period
I just don't know if two consecutive losing seasons will get you to a third. Not in this day in age, regardless of staff. If this year isn't a make year, I don't see him retained. The big question is though, what defines a "make" year.
I think the standards are still going to be pretty low for a "make" next year. If he wins five games and is competitive in all but a game or two, I think that will get him a year 3. Hell, if he gets 4 wins but is down to the wire in 4 or 5 more games (and I mean really down to the wire, not getting within 10 points at the end, but a ball bouncing the right/wrong way being the difference between winning and losing) I think that could be enough improvement to get him to year 3.I just don't know if two consecutive losing seasons will get you to a third. Not in this day in age, regardless of staff. If this year isn't a make year, I don't see him retained. The big question is though, what defines a "make" year.
Selmon isn't going to be given the option. It's going to be "we told you to make him fire Hutzler last year and you told us to 17 off so now you will fire Lebby or we will fire you".Selmon ain't firing Lebby until after year 3 minimum. Probly not even then. Selmon is not looking at this team thru maroon colored glasses. He knows it was and still is a train wreck. Period
Selmon might not get off that easy either.Selmon isn't going to be given the option. It's going to be "we told you to make him fire Hutzler last year and you told us to 17 off so now you will fire Lebby or we will fire you".
Oh I know, but the whole what defines a "make" year and what doesn't is the gray area for me. If it is 5 wins, where are those wins coming from and who do you beat to get there?We aren’t having a winning season. No way in hades. That’s not even what I want, I just want some evidence that this ship is beginning to turn the right direction. If we look as clueless as as we did last year, everyone needs to go.
Levee? Didn't you post a novella last night about respecting the program as fans?Levee is making 2025 his "make or break" year. Had he fired him, Levee would probably be "guaranteed" year three.
Oh I know, but the whole what defines a "make" year and what doesn't is the gray area for me. If it is 5 wins, where are those wins coming from and who do you beat to get there?
I get the impression that Selmon looks at State athletics from the perspective of a Blue blood.Selmon is not looking at this team thru maroon colored glasses.
I get the impression that Selmon looks at State athletics from the perspective of a Blood Blue
He doesn't believe State can do better.
I suppose that is Lebby's call to make. I wouldn't roll with him after this season. I hope that I'm way off and he just needs players. In which case, I hope that we see some defensive talent pouring in.Levee is making 2025 his "make or break" year. Had he fired him, Levee would probably be "guaranteed" year three.
Bo coming from the wrong worldview. He thinks Lenny has a chance to get this thing working. He doesn't....barring some miracle like us spending 50M and taking everybody's best players.
Isn't Hustler supposed to be a good recruiter? Pete Golding wasn't good at Bama but he had a reputation at a good recruiter and that has proven to be true. Certainly having a large bankroll and "all in" fanbase/administration helps piggly.I suppose that is Lebby's call to make. I wouldn't roll with him after this season. I hope that I'm way off and he just needs players. In which case, I hope that we see some defensive talent pouring in.
That statement was made when he was hired and everybody said " who??". They said oh yeah, great recruiter, SEC experience, yada yadaIsn't Hustler supposed to be a good recruiter? Pete Golding wasn't good at Bama but he had a reputation at a good recruiter and that has proven to be true. Certainly having a large bankroll and "all in" fanbase/administration helps piggly.
I too had a "make or break" year involving a Hustler, in about 1997.Levee is making 2025 his "make or break" year. Had he fired him, Levee would probably be "guaranteed" year three.
Mine was 20 years prior to thatI too had a "make or break" year involving a Hustler, in about 1997.
Let's hope not.Selmon might not get off that easy either.
In a weird way, I think the opposite is true. I think keeping Hutzler this season gives Lebby a bargaining chip for the end of next season. If we're down to week 9-10 or whatever next year and Lebby is on the hot seat, he can relieve Hutzler of his duties and make it seem like he's really making the tough decisions needed to make the team better. I think getting rid of Hutzler at the end of next season will buy him one more season with a new DC, probably an experienced guy that's been around for a while that will at least make the defense serviceable.Levee is making 2025 his "make or break" year. Had he fired him, Levee would probably be "guaranteed" year three.
We're probably the only university dumb enough to fall for that scheme, so maybe.In a weird way, I think the opposite is true. I think keeping Hutzler this season gives Lebby a bargaining chip for the end of next season. If we're down to week 9-10 or whatever next year and Lebby is on the hot seat, he can relieve Hutzler of his duties and make it seem like he's really making the tough decisions needed to make the team better. I think getting rid of Hutzler at the end of next season will buy him one more season with a new DC, probably an experienced guy that's been around for a while that will at least make the defense serviceable.
If he got rid of Hutzler this season and the team wasn't any better with a new DC, then he couldn't rely on the idea that the defense is the problem and would likely be gone at the end of next year.
Al 3 of them are responsible for this train wreck.so who actually gave Hutzler a guaranteed 3 year contract, Lebby, Selmon, or Keenum?
Because whomever is the culprit, should be the one that is tied to it when the DC is eventually fired since its not happening this year.
Tomorrow would be too soon for Selmon to hit the bricks.Al 3 of them are responsible for this train wreck.