Bob Feller takes pay cut

fairgambit

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,692
5,608
113
"The Man, The Myth, The Legend... On this date in 1950 Indians pitcher Bob Feller, after 15-14 season, takes $20,000 salary cut to $45,000, pay cut is Feller's own suggestion" Credit Vintage Baseball Photos. A man of honor and self reflection. Little heard of today.
It was during baseball's Golden Age and honor was a common virtue. Great players were often great men. Clemente, Musial, Banks, Aaron...the list goes on. That's not to say there are no honorable players today, but their numbers pale by comparison.
 

Nitt1300

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
4,991
9,444
113
It was during baseball's Golden Age and honor was a common virtue. Great players were often great men. Clemente, Musial, Banks, Aaron...the list goes on. That's not to say there are no honorable players today, but their numbers pale by comparison.
Sadly, that's not true only in sports.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fairgambit

Got GSPs

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
7,565
9,448
113
former football coach George Allen said that any player who accepted a paycheck after losing was stealing…
 

91Joe95

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
2,843
4,067
113
"The Man, The Myth, The Legend... On this date in 1950 Indians pitcher Bob Feller, after 15-14 season, takes $20,000 salary cut to $45,000, pay cut is Feller's own suggestion" Credit Vintage Baseball Photos. A man of honor and self reflection. Little heard of today.

Players are much more informed today. You can find countless stories of Hall of Fame players not even being the highest paid players on their team because the owners took advantage of their naivete. If Bob Feller truly understood the economics of the game, or how other players were being paid, I sincerely doubt he would have handled the situation the same way. That's not a shot at his ethics, just that his strong ethics would have probably led him to a different conclusion and/or course of action.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fairgambit

Nohow

Well-known member
Oct 25, 2021
1,189
950
113
"The Man, The Myth, The Legend... On this date in 1950 Indians pitcher Bob Feller, after 15-14 season, takes $20,000 salary cut to $45,000, pay cut is Feller's own suggestion" Credit Vintage Baseball Photos. A man of honor and self reflection. Little heard of today.
Nonsense. Did the owners give up their profits too?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lmdm and LionJim

Jim from Spicewood

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
411
994
93
"The Man, The Myth, The Legend... On this date in 1950 Indians pitcher Bob Feller, after 15-14 season, takes $20,000 salary cut to $45,000, pay cut is Feller's own suggestion" Credit Vintage Baseball Photos. A man of honor and self reflection. Little heard of today.
The guy played 18 years interrupted by four years in the military during WW2. Quite a career.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fairgambit

psu31trap

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2021
1,203
1,100
113
Players are much more informed today. You can find countless stories of Hall of Fame players not even being the highest paid players on their team because the owners took advantage of their naivete. If Bob Feller truly understood the economics of the game, or how other players were being paid, I sincerely doubt he would have handled the situation the same way. That's not a shot at his ethics, just that his strong ethics would have probably led him to a different conclusion and/or course of action.
Before free agency baseball was run like a monarchy. Every team was a little kingdom. Still, there’s pros and cons in both eras. Today, I couldn’t tell you the starting lineup to the 2022 NY Mets until a month or so after the season starts. From 1969-1975 you knew every player on your team before spring training ever started. The flip side was that owners financially abused many of the older players. It was heart wrenching to see them struggle financially in their later years. But let’s be honest this happened in every sport, boxing being the biggest abuser.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LionJim

PhillyBillyReprise

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2021
574
981
93
January 1954

PHILADELPHIA, Jan. 12 (AP) -- Headaches piled up today for President Bob Carpenter of the Philadelphia Phillies. First, Pitcher Robin Roberts, a twenty-three game winner, said absolutely no to a proposed pay cut. Then, Richie Ashburn, the club's top hitter at .330, said no to a slight increase.
 

MrTailgate

Well-known member
Oct 19, 2021
802
1,504
93
One of the greatest interviews was Tim K interviewing Feller about his legendary career and Feller discussing his service during the War as his greatest accomplishment and that his baseball accomplishments aren’t jack squat. It’s something that Timmy will still marvel at.
 

LafayetteBear

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
641
785
93
former football coach George Allen said that any player who accepted a paycheck after losing was stealing…
I'm guessing that George Allen never turned down a paycheck after a loss. If not, how hypocritical. Pardon me if I am not unduly sympathetic of the plight of wealth MLB and NFL team owners. Either then or now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nitt1300

fairgambit

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,692
5,608
113
January 1954

PHILADELPHIA, Jan. 12 (AP) -- Headaches piled up today for President Bob Carpenter of the Philadelphia Phillies. First, Pitcher Robin Roberts, a twenty-three game winner, said absolutely no to a proposed pay cut. Then, Richie Ashburn, the club's top hitter at .330, said no to a slight increase.
Roberts was coming off a 23 win season. He had won 28 the year before and the cheap *** Phillies wanted to cut his salary? It should be noted he won 23 games the following 2 seasons as well and is in the Hall of Fame, as is Ashburn.
 

fairgambit

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,692
5,608
113
Players are much more informed today. You can find countless stories of Hall of Fame players not even being the highest paid players on their team because the owners took advantage of their naivete. If Bob Feller truly understood the economics of the game, or how other players were being paid, I sincerely doubt he would have handled the situation the same way. That's not a shot at his ethics, just that his strong ethics would have probably led him to a different conclusion and/or course of action.
I will respectfully disagree Joe. Bob Feller knew the economics of the game. He was a savy businessman. He organized barnstorming tours in the off season, and entered into endorsement deals, that made him one of the wealthiest players of his generation. On the other hand, perhaps that made it easier for him to take a pay cut.
I will certainly agree that the owners took advantage of players in that era and the players had little leverage. Most had to take second jobs in the off season to make ends meet. One example:
In Game Two of the 1966 World Series, 20-year-old pitcher Jim Palmer tossed a complete-game shutout against the Los Angeles Dodgers. The Baltimore Orioles won the series and Palmer became an overnight sensation. Palmer’s salary for the season was $7,500. Even with his $11,000 World Series bonus, it wasn’t enough to cover the cost of a new home and the birth of his first child. So he took a second job. He sold suits at Hamburgers Clothing in downtown Baltimore for $150 a week, “enough to pay for groceries, hot water and electricity.”
The example is from this link:
https://medium.com/buzzer-beater/when-ballplayers-had-offseason-jobs-66bba31cecb2#
 
Last edited:

Got GSPs

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
7,565
9,448
113
I'm guessing that George Allen never turned down a paycheck after a loss. If not, how hypocritical. Pardon me if I am not unduly sympathetic of the plight of wealth MLB and NFL team owners. Either then or now.
He was a coach and not owner, and I believe it was not literal. He just was referring to players playing for the money as opposed to winning being the true goal
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login