Buy/Sell

[hatfieldms]

The NCAA play in game should be the last two at large berths instead of 2 smaller schools that won their tourney. I think it should definitely be the last 2 at large berths because for these smaller schools if they win their conference tournament they should have the chance to play in the big tourney and if you take the last 2 at large berths you would have bigger schools which would make that Tuesday night game at least watchable

 

[dawgball]

But not for the same reasoning. I don't agree that these smaller schools that win their conference tournament necessarily deserve to play in the tourney. Moreover, if the smaller schools didn't have to play in, you'd then have two unwatchable games.

 

[hatfieldms]

I have no problem with these schools getting in for winning their conference tournaments but I just think if they do win it they shoudl be in.

 

[QuaoarsKing]

I would support as many as 8 play-in games for all the 11 and 12 (or 13 if necessary) seeds.

 

[rebelrouseri]

arizona state v. syracuse for the chance to play a one seed? the last couple of teams out could would be a much tougher draw for the one seed. or would the play in game be for the 12 see or something?

 

[Todd4State]

I like that idea. That way people like Virginia Tech and Arizona State can't *****.

 

[hatfieldms]

arizona state v. syracuse for the chance to play a one seed? the last couple of teams out could would be a much tougher draw for the one seed. or would the play in game be for the 12 see or something?

If it was 2 major conference teams they could be playing for a chance to be a 7-10 seed
</p>