Why do we have the 2nd to lowest budget for athletics in the SEC? Is it boosters? Is it administration? I don’t really get it. Are we just truly that poor? Higher budget equals higher success in my opinion. I may be wrong, but I feel like the university doesn’t take football seriously at all. Aside from Mike Leach..all of our head coaches since Croom have been unproved coordinators, unless you count Croomhead’s tenure at fordham. Make it make sense please.