CFB: potential holdouts over EA video game

Uscg1984

Well-known member
Jan 28, 2022
1,778
2,356
113
I’m fine with generic players if there is a hold out. I only played the Dynasty mode anyway so I only used current players for a season or two.
Right. Plus, I don't really understand why a video game is inherently better because the player in the game is named "Spencer Rattler" rather than Robert Gordon.

I wonder if the 2024 version will include NIL and transfers in the programming. Who cares what the kid's name is when he bolts for Alabama after his freshman season?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bubba Fett

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,162
12,152
113
How does it work for the NFL video games? They obviously don’t pay every player millions of dollars.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rogue Cock
Jul 25, 2022
149
87
28
How does it work for the NFL video games? They obviously don’t pay every player millions of dollars.
Yes because they have a players organization. The NFLPA has an agreement with madden that includes the players NIL. That agreement sees to it that each player is fairly compensated. That amount is not disclosed.
 

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,162
12,152
113
The amount of money for NFL players is misleading. There is a lot fewer folks on an NFL roster than what comprises NCAA football. More players = less money.
Even so. If every player on a team's gameday roster received $200,000 for being in the game, that's $307,200,000, which obviously isn't feasible.

If I were EA, I'd simply put the offer out there. If you want to take $500 to be in the game, you can have it. If not, you won't be in the game. I'm not a gamer, but the general sense I get is that fans don't really care, they just want the game.
 

Rogue Cock

Joined Sep 11, 2000
Jan 22, 2022
10,019
14,906
113
To my knowledge, they have not formally unionized. I believe that is going to be the ultimate result.
And then comes Employer/Employee status and collective bargaining. Over the cliff we go.

As I previously noted when the NIL decision came out, it was simply the camel’s nose under the tent. Sigh!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 92Pony

DarkCock

Joined Jan 21, 2006
Jan 30, 2022
4,133
10,906
113
A players association is a union.
Seems kind of the opposite of a union. Like the article suggests, Caleb Williams would want more money than a defensive tackle at Wake Forest, who would probably be happy with 500 bucks and his image in a video game. Why wouldn't EA Sports just negotiate with the top players on the top teams, especially skilled players, because they are the ones most people care about?

I remember the talk about Northwestern football players wanting to unionize about a decade ago. A lot of "bleeding hearts" in the media (even a local guy) pushed that story a lot, but the truth is that "paying players" would inevitably result in the top players on the top teams making most of the money. It will never be equalitarian. The gap between the "have's" and "have not's" will only continue to widen.
 

Yard_Pimps

Well-known member
Jul 11, 2022
1,050
557
113
And then comes Employer/Employee status and collective bargaining. Over the cliff we go.

As I previously noted when the NIL decision came out, it was simply the camel’s nose under the tent. Sigh!
Bring it, I for one think the employer/employee model is the way to go. I know that makes the forever school crowd upset. However, it hasn’t been about school in a long long time, decades.
 

Rogue Cock

Joined Sep 11, 2000
Jan 22, 2022
10,019
14,906
113
Bring it, I for one think the employer/employee model is the way to go. I know that makes the forever school crowd upset. However, it hasn’t been about school in a long long time, decades.
There is a good chance it will end intercollegiate sports. Better chance that it will end athletic scholarships. Too many legal issues with labor and employment law, insurance, tax, etc. It will definitely end many of the benefits of a nonprofit organization under 501c.
 
Last edited:

Yard_Pimps

Well-known member
Jul 11, 2022
1,050
557
113
There is a good chance it will end intercollegiate sports. Better chance that it will end athletic scholarships. Too many legal issues with labor and employment law, insurance, tax, etc. It will definitely end many of the benefits of a nonprofit organization under 501c.
I’m just not one that believes that is for the worse. I think believing it will end college football is a little extreme. As far other sports, other than basketball and baseball I could care less.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Rogue Cock

FamouslyGarnet

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2022
173
780
93
Fun fact, two former players in the Association played for Clemson. So just add another reason to despise the orange and purple.
 

Begonenow

Joined Mar 23, 2009
Jan 25, 2022
692
1,177
93
These kids have huge egos, by and large, and love to play games. Let them opt out and not be able to play as themselves. They will reconsider.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lurker123