Deion is doing some eye opening things at Jackson State.
Good for JSU… if Brewster was available, we should have hired him. I feel confident he’d help with recruiting
I think getting rid of the Vet and expanding the hospital is good enough. That area will develop quickly. Plus, it's the cheapest way out of the Vet for the state. And I also don't think a football stadium nets anything really good for the city, as the only other thing it can do besides Jackson State is host a minor bowl game, which is shrinking in importance by the minute, and high school games. MSU, Ole Miss or USM aren't coming back.I really wish they would build the stadium downtown instead of on-campus. They have an opportunity to build up downtown around a new stadium. It would be good for JSU, Jackson and the state of Mississippi. The on-campus stadium is only good for JSU.
I really wish they would build the stadium downtown instead of on-campus. They have an opportunity to build up downtown around a new stadium. It would be good for JSU, Jackson and the state of Mississippi. The on-campus stadium is only good for JSU.
"I’m so blessed and so fortunate to be here at Florida State University. Jimbo rescued me from Mississippi State."I remember something about that. Remind me what he said.
We were one dumass ***** short of our quota, thanks for stepping up.Very tacky post
I really wish they would build the stadium downtown instead of on-campus. They have an opportunity to build up downtown around a new stadium. It would be good for JSU, Jackson and the state of Mississippi. The on-campus stadium is only good for JSU.
There is some type of agreement that says the state has to give a certain sum of money to JSU's stadium if they ever do anything with the Vet. That agreement may be capped at a certain amount, I can't remember, but building on-campus is certainly the cheapest way to do it. And it's what JSU wants. Win-Win.My only problem with JSU building a new on-campus stadium is that I fear that it will be paid for by the taxpayers of the State of Mississippi. When we and Ole Miss expanded our stadiums, how much did taxpayers pay for those expansions? Maybe I missed something here. Does JSU have a bunch of wealthy donors who are going to go on the hook to pay for something like that. I seem to recall when Alcorn State built their new stadium years ago, the state provided most, if not all, of the funding. Did the state not basically give Veterans Memorial Stadium to Jackson State years ago? I’m not being a smartass here-I’m asking honest questions? How will Jackson State pay for a new stadium today, especially with construction costs at an all-time high? I personally don’t feel it’s fair to put Mississippi taxpayers on the hook for a new football stadium when the state needs money to take care of so many other needs that benefit the public. Just thinking out loud here. Somebody please tell me how this gets paid for.
"I’m so blessed and so fortunate to be here at Florida State University. Jimbo rescued me from Mississippi State."
I've had to look into this for work in the past year thanks to them filling up the Vet again, and some things I've learned in that: 1) JSU has acquired a TON of old residential property to the east of their campus over to Terry Road, and has demolished a ton of old houses. They absolutely have room to put it on-campus (and who could begrudge a college wanting an on-campus stadium, honestly?), and 2) the bill that transferred Veterans Stadium from the Dept of Finance & Administration to Jackson State specifically says it belongs to JSU until they start playing football games at another venue, at which point the entire property passes to UMMC to utilize as they see fit (which means it'll be demolished to make way for UMMC expansion).
vhdawg said in an earlier thread on the Jackson State stadium that they've got the necessary land.
Link: Here.
"Improved" is a gray word. Birmingham has gotten better, but mainly because it's a metro area of 1.3 million people, and is the business center of a bigger state, and HAS NO CHOICE but to get better. You could say Jackson has also gotten better on a smaller scale. Both cities are in too big to fail territory. Jackson is the governmental and business center of its state as well, so thinking that the metro area will go away is stupid. Jackson will eventually improve too.Birmingham and Jackson are very different.
Birmingham has improved.
Jackson has not.
And I have more reason to be biased toward Jackson than I do birmingham.
My guess is the northeastern section surrounded by the parkway, University/Terry, Lynch, and Poindexter.
It's double the size. Of course it's going to have better things. Can you not read and think critically about the topic? You just clean whiffed on the content of my post.Birmingham is 100 times better than Jackson.
Does inner city birmingham have problems? Sure but they do a pretty good job of keeping it controlled/limited to certain areas.
ETA: unless something has happened since June 2019 that I don’t know about. Spent 180 days plus a year there for 3 plus years.