If 2006 had never happened, would John Cohen's name even be mentioned in the coaching search? Or, if he hadn't gone to Mississippi State? While he has a decent record and had a major turnaround in '06, I'm not sure why he is the de facto #1 candidate, especially considering the threads about how we should be able to attract the best candidates in college baseball. Cohen is young, fiery, and is obviously a great hitting coach, but is he really the best choice to take over our program besides being an alum and the opposite of Polk with regard to age, passion, and hitting approach?
If we're really a school that can attract the best coaches in the nation, why wouldn't our list have Pat Murphy, George Horton, Pat Casey or Mike Fox at the top of it? All of these guys have been to the CWS multiple times, and Casey and Horton have won it. Is it delusional to think any of these guys would leave their current situations? Maybe so, but the worst they can do is say no. But if we really are a school that can attract anyone, I'd rather have one of these guys over a coach who's had one great season where his team got beat in the regional, followed by another decent year where his team didn't even go to a regional.
If we're really a school that can attract the best coaches in the nation, why wouldn't our list have Pat Murphy, George Horton, Pat Casey or Mike Fox at the top of it? All of these guys have been to the CWS multiple times, and Casey and Horton have won it. Is it delusional to think any of these guys would leave their current situations? Maybe so, but the worst they can do is say no. But if we really are a school that can attract anyone, I'd rather have one of these guys over a coach who's had one great season where his team got beat in the regional, followed by another decent year where his team didn't even go to a regional.