Jesus, you're a broken record.But but but analytics said to go for it on 4th
And part of Dallas’ win was going for it on 4th from their own 40 in the first half on a drive that led to a TD. They fail there, and the dinosaurs blast McCarthy. They picked it up though, so no one will ever mention it, since we only point fingers at analytical decisions when they fail.Jesus, you're a broken record.
Not sure what play you're talking about as I didn't watch. I do see there was a 4th and goal in the 3rd Q at the dal 3 where the giants kicked a FG and espn analytics said go. And they lose by 5. Thank God they kicked the field goal or they would have lost by 8.
It reminds me of the poker players that remember every bad beat, but have never sucked out in their lives.And part of Dallas’ win was going for it on 4th from their own 40 in the first half on a drive that led to a TD. They fail there, and the dinosaurs blast McCarthy. They picked it up though, so no one will ever mention it, since we only point fingers at analytical decisions when they fail.
I thought average was being kindIs it just me, or did Parsons look average in this game?
Giants wouldn’t have had a chance to win at the end if they hadn’t taken their field goals. Putting points in the board changed how Dallas played but if you didn’t watch the whole game you wouldn’t knowJesus, you're a broken record.
Not sure what play you're talking about as I didn't watch. I do see there was a 4th and goal in the 3rd Q at the dal 3 where the giants kicked a FG and espn analytics said go. And they lose by 5. Thank God they kicked the field goal or they would have lost by 8.
Well he was facing one of the best LT in the game and was frequently double teamed as well, but whatever.I thought average was being kind
Different downs and distances; apples and oranges. Giants didn’t score a TD the whole game but yeah “analytics” says to go for the TD on 4th and goal from the 3 on the first possession of the second half. Sure why not?And part of Dallas’ win was going for it on 4th from their own 40 in the first half on a drive that led to a TD. They fail there, and the dinosaurs blast McCarthy. They picked it up though, so no one will ever mention it, since we only point fingers at analytical decisions when they fail.
But they didn't win. They needed 5 more points which they left on the table.Giants wouldn’t have had a chance to win at the end if they hadn’t taken their field goals. Putting points in the board changed how Dallas played but if you didn’t watch the whole game you wouldn’t know
Different down and distance? The cowboys were on their 40! That's even riskier. As erial said, the dinosaurs would have melted down if they missed it and lost.Different downs and distances; apples and oranges. Giants didn’t score a TD the whole game but yeah “analytics” says to go for the TD on 4th and goal from the 3 on the first possession of the second half. Sure why not?
Or Daniel Jones for the loss. Betcha the Giants wish they had handled his and Saquon's contract situation differently.Amani Oruwariye for the win.
Betcha Saquon is just fine with the decision.Or Daniel Jones for the loss. Betcha the Giants wish they had handled his and Saquon's contract situation differently.
Probably, but not entirely.Betcha Saquon is just fine with the decision.
Jets fan, played for the Giants. Probably wonders why he is being punished so.Poor guy grew up a Jets fan.