Credit to Tanner

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,171
12,160
113
The state is fully garnet for the first time in quite a while.

If we'd lost to Clemson in football, MBB and baseball, he for sure would have been the target of our fans' ire, so I suppose he logically must get the credit since we dominated the rivalry this year.
 

Go Gamecocks

Well-known member
Jan 24, 2022
798
701
93
Ray's like that old dog you kick when you get mad.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: 18IsTheMan

Captain_Obvious

Well-known member
Feb 18, 2022
584
1,108
93
For context this is the first time since 2011-12 that Carolina beat clemson in football, basketball, and baseball.
Tanner became AD in 2012 and this is the first time in his tenure that we’ve won all 3 in the same year.
If he gets credit for this year, he also takes the blame for the previous 10.

Really don’t want to be a downer though.

It is a dang good feeling to have those wins especially after a drought.
May the teams keep on this direction!
 

Prestonyte

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
5,261
5,214
113
Glad he brought Monte Lee in.
There is a difference in hitting approach from past years. Don't know, but I'm giving Monte credit.
 

SC95

Joined Mar 31, 2008
Jan 31, 2022
545
1,145
93
For context this is the first time since 2011-12 that Carolina beat clemson in football, basketball, and baseball.
Tanner became AD in 2012 and this is the first time in his tenure that we’ve won all 3 in the same year.
If he gets credit for this year, he also takes the blame for the previous 10.

Really don’t want to be a downer though.

It is a dang good feeling to have those wins especially after a drought.
May the teams keep on this direction!
How often has this--beating the Tigers in football, basketball, and baseball--occurred?

Clemson holds the lead in baseball (186-145-2) and football (72-43-4). South Carolina leads in basketball (92-80). Mathematically, it must be an uncommon event.

I recognize Tanner's shortcomings, but some Gamecock fans are relentless in their criticism of Tanner.
 

Dod Rangerfield

Well-known member
Jan 30, 2022
1,856
1,806
113
How often has this--beating the Tigers in football, basketball, and baseball--occurred?

Clemson holds the lead in baseball (186-145-2) and football (72-43-4). South Carolina leads in basketball (92-80). Mathematically, it must be an uncommon event.

I recognize Tanner's shortcomings, but some Gamecock fans are relentless in their criticism of Tanner.
They may hold the overall lead in baseball, but that whole Omaha deal..........................very much gives us the trump card there.
 

Captain_Obvious

Well-known member
Feb 18, 2022
584
1,108
93
How often has this--beating the Tigers in football, basketball, and baseball--occurred?

Clemson holds the lead in baseball (186-145-2) and football (72-43-4). South Carolina leads in basketball (92-80). Mathematically, it must be an uncommon event.

I recognize Tanner's shortcomings, but some Gamecock fans are relentless in their criticism of Tanner.
Very fair point! I checked and it’s only happened 3 times in the past 35 years. 2023, 2012, and 2011. 2001-02 school years was the next closest wins in football, basketball, and a 3-3 tie in baseball.

I’ll tip my hat to coach Tanner. He indeed deserves a congratulations for overseeing what has been accomplished this school year! It feels good to be back
 

Captain_Obvious

Well-known member
Feb 18, 2022
584
1,108
93
They may hold the overall lead in baseball, but that whole Omaha deal..........................very much gives us the trump card there.
The record over the past 35 years is 61-63-2. Very evenly matched in recent history despite the overall record.
It really is one of the best rivalries in college baseball
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bwellgolf

Uscg1984

Well-known member
Jan 28, 2022
1,778
2,356
113
When was the last time Clemson beat us in Football, baseball, men's and women's basketball. I realize we've been holding on by the women's basketball thread to avoid the 0-4 sweep in recent years, but when was the last time they accomplished over us?
 

SC95

Joined Mar 31, 2008
Jan 31, 2022
545
1,145
93
They may hold the overall lead in baseball, but that whole Omaha deal..........................very much gives us the trump card there.
Let's get back to the Omaha is expected. I live in the Charlottesville, Virginia, area. Just purchased tickets for one of the LSU games. Looking to forward to seeing Gamecock baseball in person. It's been a long time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dod Rangerfield
Mar 8, 2023
131
155
43
The state is fully garnet for the first time in quite a while.

If we'd lost to Clemson in football, MBB and baseball, he for sure would have been the target of our fans' ire, so I suppose he logically must get the credit since we dominated the rivalry this year.
I never really understood the venom our so-called fans sink to when it comes to Tanner. ADs are judged on the health/success of their programs, hiring of coaches, and running a clean ship.

1) Health and success of programs: Of the sports most people care about (football, baseball, men's and women's basketball), football is on the rise. Baseball off to a good start after an injury plagued year, women's basketball speaks for itself, men's basketball currently in "Year Zero" with a new coach that has very little talent after Martin was fired... which a lot of people on this board wanted. Most or all of the other sports are doing very well winning conference championships and earning top 25 rankings, going to postseason. Financially, I read an article a while back about how USC under Tanner is one of the few (maybe less than 12) D1 Athletics Departments that actually operate in the black. That's huge.
2) Hirings - Muschamp wasn't a great hire but what we got stuck with after Kirby Smart (or more accurately, his agent) played him. Tanner can take the blame for a C+ hire that actually started out pretty good the first two years but then unravelled. Hiring Beamer was a a solid A hire. Men's basketball Lamont Paris remains to be seen, and it will take a couple more years to see if it works out, but on paper seemed like an OK hire based on Paris' recruiting record. Baseball - hiring Holbrook was the right hire at the time he was hired. Our fans would have gone crazy if Chad went to Tennessee. It was the right hire that didn't work out. That happens, but it was still the right hire. He was fired at the right time as well. Kingston wasn't the first choice, and USC would have had Florida's coach had the Gators not won the CWS that year. That was going to happen and then UF promised him a new stadium and he couldn't leave. So you go further down the list and Kingston seemed like a guy who build programs that didn't have many resources, so it made sense to think he could really do something at a place that has resources. Kingston gets a pass because of all the injuries last year, so this year he's got to get to postseason in a stacked-league at the minimum. Tanner's volleyball and men's soccer hires were good by most accounts (VB has made some trips to NCAA Tournament and men's soccer got a widely respected coach who had to take over floundering program that plays in a mid-major conf - SEC doesn't carry men's soccer). Tanner also responsible for keeping Dawn Staley from leaving for Ohio State a few years back. That's a real thing! Based on the number of football coaches that get fired every year, there are very few AD's who can claim to have made a home run hire.
3) Clean ship - financially USC is in good shape. No major violations from programs. Coaches are doing things the right way.
 

Gradstudent

Joined Feb 11, 2006
Feb 2, 2022
1,133
1,720
113
Speaking of AD's, I was very happy to see Dan Radakovich leave Clemson for Miami, and so far I'm very pleased with what I have seen from Clemson with Graham Neff as their AD.
 

atl-cock

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2022
2,386
1,260
113
For context this is the first time since 2011-12 that Carolina beat clemson in football, basketball, and baseball.
Tanner became AD in 2012 and this is the first time in his tenure that we’ve won all 3 in the same year.
If he gets credit for this year, he also takes the blame for the previous 10.

Really don’t want to be a downer though.

It is a dang good feeling to have those wins especially after a drought.
May the teams keep on this direction!
4, not 3.
 

atl-cock

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2022
2,386
1,260
113
Tanner’s strength is coaching baseball. Not running a complex SEC athletic program. Im not buying that Tanner has finally figured it out.
Tanner is as likely to return to the dugout as USC is to return to the ACC.
 

Cocky99

Well-known member
Jan 27, 2022
574
503
93
Tanner is 64. I would think that his exit ramp is getting close.
Most people are thinking and hoping that Tanner just retires out soon due to his age. But I wouldn’t hold my breath. Look at the current POTUS who can barley walk. Joe Biden is 80y/o and head of the Country. So Tanner as AD could just be getting started. eep!!!
In the Military there is a term for people who stay at work on auto-pilot mode. They are called RODs. (Retired On Duty)
 
Last edited: