Will we be seeing more of this among smaller programs?
https://nypost.com/2023/03/20/st-francis-brooklyn-stunningly-cuts-entire-athletics-program/
https://nypost.com/2023/03/20/st-francis-brooklyn-stunningly-cuts-entire-athletics-program/
That sucks.Will we be seeing more of this among smaller programs?
https://nypost.com/2023/03/20/st-francis-brooklyn-stunningly-cuts-entire-athletics-program/
Yes. And from much bigger programs than that.Will we be seeing more of this among smaller programs?
https://nypost.com/2023/03/20/st-francis-brooklyn-stunningly-cuts-entire-athletics-program/
Yanking the plug.Sounds like they're dropping the varsity sports programs altogether, and not moving to D-II or D-III.
All sports are important. If you think about it, having a "well-rounded" athletic program puts a school in a much better light than if all the school sponsored was football and men's basketball.Well, thanks to Title IX, you can’t just keep the important sports that people want to see.
All sports are important. If you think about it, having a "well-rounded" athletic program puts a school in a much better light than if all the school sponsored was football and men's basketball.
Indeed, the sports most people want to see are important to bringing in the $$$ to compete at a high level. But that's not the be-all and end-all of college athletics.
I'm rather surprised that they disbanded altogether instead of going to D-II or D-III, which I would think is more affordable for "schools on a budget."The point is that I'm sure this school could have afforded to keep SOME sports, like MBB, but TItle IX doesn't allow that.
Well, all a school has to do is forgo Federal Assistance from the U.S. Dept of Education, and they no longer have to adhere to Title lX.Well, thanks to Title IX, you can’t just keep the important sports that people want to see.
I respect you for that. You have to treat differently the sport that not only pays the bills but also necessarily involves the most male participants.I'm the biggest lefty on this board, but even I think football should be exempted from Title 9 numbers.
I agree with you completely, but the $$$ the revenue sports bring in isn't just about competing athletically. The revenue sports, especially football, have become tremendous marketing tools for P5 universities. In some cases, I think it's fair to say they are the primary marketing tool. As hard as it is to build a winning football team, it's a heck of a lot easier for some schools than building a top 10 Engineering or Business school.All sports are important. If you think about it, having a "well-rounded" athletic program puts a school in a much better light than if all the school sponsored was football and men's basketball.
Indeed, the sports most people want to see are important to bringing in the $$$ to compete at a high level. But that's not the be-all and end-all of college athletics.
With no corresponding womens sport, as with the other sportsI respect you for that. You have to treat differently the sport that not only pays the bills but also necessarily involves the most male participants.
As of now. Craziness carries a lot of potential. Women's football could be just over the horizon.With no corresponding womens sport, as with the other sports
I thought of that. It exists no. Not organized- yetAs of now. Craziness carries a lot of potential. Women's football could be just over the horizon.
I'm the biggest lefty on this board, but even I think football should be exempted from Title 9 numbers.
I respect you for that. You have to treat differently the sport that not only pays the bills but also necessarily involves the most male participants.