If he simply labeled them Tier #1 thru Tier #5 it would make more sense even if some rankings would still be debatable. Calling Pitt a Tier #3 job would be about right. Calling it a "strong job" is a bit of an overstatement. Also, I wouldn't really consider Iowa Tier #2, maybe Tier #2.5. But "desirable"?? Nah. The same goes for Ole Miss. I'd also put FSU in Tier #1 but not Texas. To me it seems the Texas job comes with too many headaches caused by boosters. I also agree that Nebraska should be bumped down.sPitt way too high.
Yeah, how is Nebraska a Teir 1?If he simply labeled them Tier #1 thru Tier #5 it would make more sense even if some rankings would still be debatable. Calling Pitt a Tier #3 job would be about right. Calling it a "strong job" is a bit of an overstatement. Also, I wouldn't really consider Iowa Tier #2, maybe Tier #2.5. But "desirable"?? Nah. The same goes for Ole Miss. I'd also put FSU in Tier #1 but not Texas. To me it seems the Texas job comes with too many headaches caused by boosters. I also agree that Nebraska should be bumped down.
No idea who this guy is, but mostly agree…maybe flip Texas and Nebraska.
Fixed, Goddamnit.Has no place here. Everything we discuss is heavily rooted in science and mathematics.
Fixed, Goddamnit.
What makes UCLA Tier 2? The weather? Location? Seeing USC song girls around town? And don’t start throwing flags - here you go.
Fair points. But IMO they’re a significant afterthought in the PAC and will be in the Big10 too.Access to talent, location, weather, conference/media money, etc. Reminds me of Iowa with better weather, prettier girls, and more hs football talent within the state.
Fair points. But IMO they’re a significant afterthought in the PAC and will be in the Big10 too.
Why BYU though?But it’s a program with potential and in one of the best places in the country for HS football. If UCLA wants to ‘compete’ with the big boys, it certainly can.
No idea who this guy is, but mostly agree…maybe flip Texas and Nebraska.
Fight on!What makes UCLA Tier 2? The weather? Location? Seeing USC song girls around town? And don’t start throwing flags - here you go.
I'd switch Washington with BYU and Florida with Oklahoma State and maybe Miami with Michigan State.Mormons are a lock.
Consider the source.He's got several programs in his top category that haven't won a natty in the last 20 years, and that seems questionable
He's got several programs in his top category that haven't won a natty in the last 20 years, and that seems questionable
Yo, you live in the southWinning NC’s is only one part of desirability; I personally wouldn’t take most jobs in the South. No interest in living there.
Yo, you live in the south
Well....Northern Virginia isn’t the South! Or so I keep telling myself….
i guess you could argue that a guy with middling results in the worst division in P5, who throws temper tantrums on the sidelines and is 2-4 in bowls lasts....what, 7 years now? You could argue that the job security is at least pretty good.If he simply labeled them Tier #1 thru Tier #5 it would make more sense even if some rankings would still be debatable. Calling Pitt a Tier #3 job would be about right. Calling it a "strong job" is a bit of an overstatement. Also, I wouldn't really consider Iowa Tier #2, maybe Tier #2.5. But "desirable"?? Nah. The same goes for Ole Miss. I'd also put FSU in Tier #1 but not Texas. To me it seems the Texas job comes with too many headaches caused by boosters. I also agree that Nebraska should be bumped down.