Grizz beat the poo outta the Warriors

hatfieldms

Well-known member
Feb 20, 2008
8,252
1,396
113
So millionaires lost on purpose so billionaires can make more money? Ok
 

msstate7

Member
Nov 27, 2008
10,388
10
38
If the grizzlies can somehow win game 6, I think they take the series. Don't feel real confident about game 6 though
 

jethreauxdawg

Well-known member
Dec 20, 2010
8,665
8,085
113
So millionaires lost on purpose so billionaires can make more money? Ok
Maybe not lose on purpose, but they certainly didn’t give their best effort. Warriors didn’t even give their 70% effort. They took that game off.
 

hatfieldms

Well-known member
Feb 20, 2008
8,252
1,396
113
That’s not what you said though. You insinuated they lost on purpose so the owners could make more money in game 6. Which is just stupid
 
Last edited:

FlotownDawg

Well-known member
Aug 30, 2012
5,489
4,350
113
That’s one reason I can’t get into the NBA. One game, a team will win by 30, the next game, the other team will win by 20-30. It’s all about who shows up for each game. Warriors chose not to show up last night and save everything for Game 6 back at home.
 

DesotoCountyDawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
22,166
9,558
113
That’s one reason I can’t get into the NBA. One game, a team will win by 30, the next game, the other team will win by 20-30. It’s all about who shows up for each game. Warriors chose not to show up last night and save everything for Game 6 back at home.


Hope you’re not a Mike Leach fan. **
 

muddawgs

Member
Aug 22, 2012
1,151
71
48
That’s one reason I can’t get into the NBA. One game, a team will win by 30, the next game, the other team will win by 20-30. It’s all about who shows up for each game. Warriors chose not to show up last night and save everything for Game 6 back at home.

yeah college baseball or any sport is nothing like that. Especially in the college World Series last year.
 

onewoof

Well-known member
Mar 4, 2008
9,763
5,915
113
It's going to game 7 back in Memphis and Ja will be back. That's what will draw the largest TV audience and the upside market for Ja is good for the NBA.
 

FlotownDawg

Well-known member
Aug 30, 2012
5,489
4,350
113
The CWS finals were nothing like that. We dominated the whole series except for the first inning of Game 1 because McLeod melted down and allowed 7 runs. We outscored them the remaining 8 innings of that game and blew them out the others. Vandy wouldn’t have even been there except for Covid, so we throttled an inferior team like we should’ve.
 

jethreauxdawg

Well-known member
Dec 20, 2010
8,665
8,085
113
I simply made a statement

That’s not what you said though. You insinuated they lost on purpose so the owners could make more money in game 6. Which is just stupid

I didn’t insinuate anything in my first post. The warriors did not try to win that game last night, but they didn’t intentionally try to lose it. Their bosses didn’t want them to win anyway. Everyone involved got what they wanted last night. Grizz got a win, Warriors got rest, owners get more money.
 

dog12

Active member
Sep 15, 2016
1,827
463
83
It's going to game 7 back in Memphis and Ja will be back. That's what will draw the largest TV audience and the upside market for Ja is good for the NBA.

Yep.

This series will go to a Game 7.
 

Dawgg

Well-known member
Sep 9, 2012
7,632
6,256
113
The CWS finals were nothing like that. We dominated the whole series except for the first inning of Game 1 because McLeod melted down and allowed 7 runs. We outscored them the remaining 8 innings of that game and blew them out the others. Vandy wouldn’t have even been there except for Covid, so we throttled an inferior team like we should’ve.

This season, baseball beat Missouri 13-4 in Game 1, then lost 19-8 the next night.

College baseball (really baseball in general) can have the same up/down series like the NBA was his point. The NHL can too.

College basketball and the NFL can have the same thing too. A team wins a game early in the season, then turns around and loses to that same team 3 weeks later or in the tournament/playoffs.

It's the whole reason those sports play multiple games, so it's not just one bad night determining what happens.

Really... College football is kind of the outlier in terms of that (though even that is changing somewhat with conference championship games and playoffs).
 

Smoked Toag

New member
Jul 15, 2021
3,262
1
0
The CWS finals were nothing like that. We dominated the whole series except for the first inning of Game 1 because McLeod melted down and allowed 7 runs. We outscored them the remaining 8 innings of that game and blew them out the others. Vandy wouldn’t have even been there except for Covid, so we throttled an inferior team like we should’ve.
Talk about missing the point, and arguing over dumb details. Geez.
 

onewoof

Well-known member
Mar 4, 2008
9,763
5,915
113
There is at least one conspiracy theorist in all NBA threads.

There's a former NBA ref that's on record for showing how he knew what games to bet on by the way the league was showing them who to focus on for fouls prior to the game
 
Oct 17, 2007
144
4
18
Clowns on here sound like Barkley's dubmass. The Grizz have led the majority of this series and not closed out games. The Warriors are experienced closers. The Warriors better not "let the Grizz win" or "not try to win" too much longer at their old NBA-ages, because the Grizzlies are going to beat their tail for the foreseeable future and have more money and assets to do it with. I'm glad Steph let the Grizz keep him out of the playoffs last year too. Definitely fits the profile of a guy who is an insane competitor with limited effective years left. You always want that extra game to risk injury when you are competing for championships***
 

jethreauxdawg

Well-known member
Dec 20, 2010
8,665
8,085
113
Don’t worry. The grizzlies won by 39 without him after losing 3 of the last four with him, even though the warriors were giving maximum effort during the 39 point loss.**
 

DesotoCountyDawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
22,166
9,558
113
They were 20-5 this season without Ja Morant so it’s not really something unusual to play well without him.
 

MissStFan87

New member
Feb 15, 2007
1,367
0
0
25 offensive rebounds and what felt like a dozen misses in the paint. Lot of missed opportunities tonight.
 

ckDOG

Well-known member
Dec 11, 2007
8,236
2,570
113
Yeah you can't beat warriors giving them second and third chances

Grizzlies deserve to lose. How can you give up 200 offensive rebounds?

Great overachieving season though. Grizz going to be wrecking the West next 5+ years.

Celtics fan rest of way now. Those dudes play hard.
 

MissStFan87

New member
Feb 15, 2007
1,367
0
0
I'm usually somewhat of a Boston sports hater, but man Tatum is so fun to watch. Dude is smooth.
 

jethreauxdawg

Well-known member
Dec 20, 2010
8,665
8,085
113
Because the Warriors were well rested

Grizzlies deserve to lose. How can you give up 200 offensive rebounds?

And the grizz were tired.
Disappointing end to a good season. Hope Ja gets healthy and learns to play without sacrificing his body as often.
 

DesotoCountyDawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
22,166
9,558
113
They beat GS by 39 because they scored a ton of points off of turnovers. Something they didn’t do most of the series. And again, the Grizzlies were 20-5 in the regular season without Ja and they beat some really good teams.

Golden State did not play well at all the entire series except for game 3 and they are way too careless with the ball which is odd with them being such a veteran team. The Grizzlies choked away game 4 and had a good chance of taking game 1. A major learning experience for an extremely young team.

If Phoenix gets past Dallas they will smash Golden States head in. It will not be pretty.
 
Last edited:

jethreauxdawg

Well-known member
Dec 20, 2010
8,665
8,085
113
I’m sorry the grizz lost too

No one losses by 39 in the NBA, or ever goes down by 55, without not trying. They knew they had the series locked up and could afford to coast for a game. The playoffs are a marathon. Veteran teams know how to manage it. Why did the grizz score so many points off turnovers in game 5? Which you pointed out they hadn’t done in other games. Because the warriors were conserving energy, aka resting.
 

olblue.sixpack

New member
Aug 23, 2012
3,616
0
0
No one losses by 39 in the NBA, or ever goes down by 55, without not trying. They knew they had the series locked up and could afford to coast for a game. The playoffs are a marathon. Veteran teams know how to manage it. Why did the grizz score so many points off turnovers in game 5? Which you pointed out they hadn’t done in other games. Because the warriors were conserving energy, aka resting.

Just can’t let it go, can you?

It amazes me how little self-awareness some of you people have.
 

MissStFan87

New member
Feb 15, 2007
1,367
0
0
They obviously wanted to save energy by losing and being forced to play an extra game in the series, because when you're an aging team nothing is better than playing 6 games when you could have won in 5 and rested up even more before the WCF!

Wait, what are we talking about again?
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login