.....so I wish everybody would get off that high horse and quit blaming Keenum. I've done it too, I've said he should have hired Spurrier, yada yada, but it was pretty much unanimous at the time that Arnett would be the best guy to stabilize everything. And I've said we should have made him keep people too, but that ship has sailed. We now simply have to move on, and criticizing Keenum gets us nowhere. We made the decisions, and now Arnett made his, and we are where we are. The next 2 weeks will play out and we will fire him Friday after Thanksgiving. Keenum has presided over a very successful time at MSU so we need to put that silly notion of getting rid of him, to bed.
The bigger problem here is how all this happened? We finally get a competent coach with name cache and he dies out of nowhere at a relative young age. And the new guy, hired for continuity, promptly goes back to what we've always done. Why did he do this? Who was he talking to? What was he thinking? Everybody who attempts to do things differently here (Foglesong, Byrne, Mullen, Cohen) end up moving on or semi-pushed out. Leach was never really embraced. Even our own guys betray us (Stricklin). What is our issue here? The only thing we seem to get right is the baseball program and we almost let that disintegrate, thank the Lord for Cohen.
So many people think about right now, this detail or that detail. I like to think big picture, very general. I'm still wondering what really happened with Cohen. That loss, and the loss of Leach, and now this, really has me pretty indifferent about football. I've never been this close to just forgetting about it. And we've got a new AD hired for NIL, one of our weakest points where we'll never really compete with the big boys. This seems like the opposite of what we should be doing.
We have a real problem. Everybody likes to say this, but what IS the problem?
The bigger problem here is how all this happened? We finally get a competent coach with name cache and he dies out of nowhere at a relative young age. And the new guy, hired for continuity, promptly goes back to what we've always done. Why did he do this? Who was he talking to? What was he thinking? Everybody who attempts to do things differently here (Foglesong, Byrne, Mullen, Cohen) end up moving on or semi-pushed out. Leach was never really embraced. Even our own guys betray us (Stricklin). What is our issue here? The only thing we seem to get right is the baseball program and we almost let that disintegrate, thank the Lord for Cohen.
So many people think about right now, this detail or that detail. I like to think big picture, very general. I'm still wondering what really happened with Cohen. That loss, and the loss of Leach, and now this, really has me pretty indifferent about football. I've never been this close to just forgetting about it. And we've got a new AD hired for NIL, one of our weakest points where we'll never really compete with the big boys. This seems like the opposite of what we should be doing.
We have a real problem. Everybody likes to say this, but what IS the problem?