If you dominated or beat those teams with a balanced team, then you have reason to be excited.
But, as has been discussed, rarely has as many breaks as MSU got last year happened to any Mississippi school, for as long as I can remember. In fact, even the Ole Miss 2003 season didn't see as many breaks. The only real break that Ole Miss got was the Auburn game, with Obumanu.
State won 3 games by virtue of a defensive touchdown. Without those defensive touchdowns, its a 4 win season, and everybody is pissed at Croom.
That was Cox's (AU) worst game of his career. Very rarely does a QB throw an interception from the 2 or 3 that goes for a TD right before the half that ends up being the winning TD. Only an idiot coach would go for it on 4th and 1 against a stout run defense on his own 45 when up by 2 TD, at the opponent's stadium. Carroll was OK, but he wasn't much to be as giddy over as many here were.
From a non-koolaid point of view, last season was a bit of a surprise and a season of break after break after break.
Not only that, but like has been said, the DC left, the best D player left, the top OL was kicked off, and the top WR is gone. Then, you realize that the Spring Game was 0-0 at the end of regulation. Thats just pitiful.
Thats kinda like the sheep at the Spirit stating after 2003 that we would be better in 2004. Thats just idiotic. Ole Miss lost its greatest player ever, the starting RB, best WR, and several defensive stars.
So, to answer you shortly, No, I wouldn't have. Hell, I'm not convinced that Ole Miss will win more than 5 or 6 games even after the performance on offense in the first game. There are many, many holes on defense.</p>