I miss this kind of football

Anon1717806835

Well-known member
Jun 7, 2024
292
784
93

I was watching the replay of that game just a few days and was thinking the same. Neither of those teams were very good. The win was not significant other than it was Ole Miss and got us a bowl game against Miami of Ohio, but it’s one of my favorite Egg Bowls from the Mullen era. That style of offense just seems to fit us best. It seemed like common sense to try to replicate it when Mullen left.
 

bulldoghair

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2013
1,189
728
108
I was watching the replay of that game just a few days and was thinking the same. Neither of those teams were very good. The win was not significant other than it was Ole Miss and got us a bowl game against Miami of Ohio, but it’s one of my favorite Egg Bowls from the Mullen era. That style of offense just seems to fit us best. It seemed like common sense to try to replicate it when Mullen left.
Common sense is not so common lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darryl Steight

Howiefeltersnstch

Well-known member
Dec 28, 2019
1,219
1,423
98
Great running QB. Passing game sucked. Strong arm but no control or touch. Definitely had a cannon. But why bother to pass when you can break 40 yard runs at will ? If he had been a more accurate passer there is no telling how great he would have been. Just a little better.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
8,925
8,377
113
It's fine when we're playing a team with similar talent. But turns into a brick wall when playing defenses with Alabama talent. This is well-documented, our genius fanbase consistently tore into Mullen over it. And it's not just Fitz, Dak had issues as well, until his senior year. That is what drove the moves to find a competent passing game, along with the modern day rules that favor that.

Our genius fanbase also wanted to bench Fitz, many times.

All that said, if NIL/portal is allowing more parity, might be possible to go back to a ground-based system. Not as many teams running around with Bama talent of old. But I still think it's advantageous to throw it, overall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dawg84

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
7,130
4,284
113
It's fine when we're playing a team with similar talent. But turns into a brick wall when playing defenses with Alabama talent. This is well-documented, our genius fanbase consistently tore into Mullen over it. And it's not just Fitz, Dak had issues as well, until his senior year. That is what drove the moves to find a competent passing game, along with the modern day rules that favor that.

Our genius fanbase also wanted to bench Fitz, many times.

All that said, if NIL/portal is allowing more parity, might be possible to go back to a ground-based system. Not as many teams running around with Bama talent of old. But I still think it's advantageous to throw it, overall.
You just can't allow any praise of the running game can you. The air raid scored 15 points in three years against Bama. That was some improvement.
 
Last edited:

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
8,925
8,377
113
You just can't allow any praise of the running game can you. The air raid scored 15 points in three years against Bama. That was some improvement.
You just can't help but get personal can you? Chill with the butthurt.

I loved Fitz. I actually hope he's a part of that lawsuit, he deserves it more than anyone.
 

bulldoghair

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2013
1,189
728
108
Wonder what he might've run had the Oxford lowlife scum-bags hadn't deliberately ruined his ankle.
Good point. I’m not sure or not if by that point it affected his time. But a 4.64 laser time for a guy his size is fast. That was about it before his injury too I’d imagine. Fitz was another type of QB in a unique system at the time, that if in this day in age wouldn’t have costed as much in NIL because the big boys wouldn’t be trying to buy him from us because he wouldn’t have fit their system.
 

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
7,130
4,284
113
You just can't help but get personal can you? Chill with the butthurt.

I loved Fitz. I actually hope he's a part of that lawsuit, he deserves it more than anyone.
That wasn't personal. That you took it as such is no surprise. You DID mention Alabama stonewalling our run game back then. To me 15 points in three years is the definition of being stonewalled.

As for Fitz, He was what he was. Mullen knew how to use him, and use him well. I'd go back to those days NOW.
 

MSUDC11-2.0

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
7,260
10,816
113
I was watching the replay of that game just a few days and was thinking the same. Neither of those teams were very good. The win was not significant other than it was Ole Miss and got us a bowl game against Miami of Ohio, but it’s one of my favorite Egg Bowls from the Mullen era. That style of offense just seems to fit us best. It seemed like common sense to try to replicate it when Mullen left.
It’s one of everybody’s favorites because we beat the everloving **** out of them after we’d only won once in Oxford since ‘98.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
8,925
8,377
113
That wasn't personal. That you took it as such is no surprise. You DID mention Alabama stonewalling our run game back then. To me 15 points in three years is the definition of being stonewalled.

As for Fitz, He was what he was. Mullen knew how to use him, and use him well. I'd go back to those days NOW.
Danny Boy only scored 20 in his first 3 years against them. And let's face it, all 3 were total beat downs.
 

DawgatAuburn

Well-known member
Apr 25, 2006
10,687
1,059
113
Fitz was fast and had great vision. He was actually a better runner than Dak.

Regarding 2016, if he starts v USA, we win. Barely but we win.
Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't he start and after two three and outs on the first two possessions, Mullen pulled and put Damien Williams in the game?
 

Maroon13

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
2,150
2,207
113
Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't he start and after two three and outs on the first two possessions, Mullen pulled and put Damien Williams in the game?
Google is better than my memory.
You are correct.

Fitz started and was cold. Punt punt
Williams came in 3rd drive and led 3 scoring drives. 20 points.
Offense went cold in the 2nd half. Mustering 3 points. Conservative decision to punt one drive. Missed FGs on two other drives.
 
Last edited:

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
8,925
8,377
113
Google is better than my memory.
You are correct.

Fitz started and was cold. Punt punt
Williams came in 3rd drive and led 3 scoring drives. 20 points.
Offense went cold in the 2nd half. Mustering 3 points. Conservative decision to punt one drive. Missed FGs on two other drives.
The morale of that offseason (between 2015 and 2016) was just total crap. We actually had some good young talent that year, Mullen just didn't GAF until we got a little momentum going, which of course he saw as his eventual way out of Starkville. He let that QB competition hang around way too long in preseason. Everyone could see in the SC game how much of a freak athlete Fitz was, and that he could carry the offense at times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CochiseCowbell

StateCollege

Well-known member
Oct 17, 2022
530
792
93
All that said, if NIL/portal is allowing more parity, might be possible to go back to a ground-based system. Not as many teams running around with Bama talent of old. But I still think it's advantageous to throw it, overall.
Historically, Lebby has run a ground-based system
 

engie

Member
May 29, 2011
10,746
92
48
It's fine when we're playing a team with similar talent. But turns into a brick wall when playing defenses with Alabama talent. This is well-documented, our genius fanbase consistently tore into Mullen over it. And it's not just Fitz, Dak had issues as well, until his senior year. That is what drove the moves to find a competent passing game, along with the modern day rules that favor that.

Our genius fanbase also wanted to bench Fitz, many times.

All that said, if NIL/portal is allowing more parity, might be possible to go back to a ground-based system. Not as many teams running around with Bama talent of old. But I still think it's advantageous to throw it, overall.

I remember this offense having quite a bit of success against eventual national champion Bama the very next year with this same offense in a game I'm still pretty upset that we/the refs found a way to lose. It was impressive how well we ran the ball that night.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bulldoghair

Seinfeld

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2006
9,925
4,420
113
Honest question because I was barely able to watch any of our last 3 games due to kids' events, but can Van Buren run? He seems like a decent athlete from what I was able to see last weekend, but I was a little surprised to see these numbers:

Florida: 5 carries, -5 yds
Texas: 12 carries, -12 yds
Georgia: 5 carries, 15 yds

At the same time, I've seen our O line this year so I do somewhat get it
 
  • Like
Reactions: bulldoghair

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,584
2,854
113
Great running QB. Passing game sucked. Strong arm but no control or touch. Definitely had a cannon. But why bother to pass when you can break 40 yard runs at will ? If he had been a more accurate passer there is no telling how great he would have been. Just a little better.
I think that's judging him a little harshly. He was still improving his Jr. year but didn't have any WRs. His senior year he had an offense run by slo mo. Certainly he wasn't a good passer, but I think if you give him a decent receiving corp and another year with Mullen and he probably would have been fine.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
8,925
8,377
113
I think that's judging him a little harshly. He was still improving his Jr. year but didn't have any WRs. His senior year he had an offense run by slo mo. Certainly he wasn't a good passer, but I think if you give him a decent receiving corp and another year with Mullen and he probably would have been fine.
Danny leaving the way he did is why I’ll never consider him as any type of royalty at MSU. I’ll applaud him, but that’s about it. We probably don’t lose that Egg Bowl if we’re properly prepared. Fitz probably doesn’t get hurt. Then we go into 2018 with all those hurt WRs back plus that Guidry dude, and also Mille would have properly used Aeris and Hill in a complimentary fashion. We still probably go 10-2 max but that team would have been hell. And we’d have still been coach-less for the bowl game.
 

L4Dawg

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2016
7,130
4,284
113
Danny leaving the way he did is why I’ll never consider him as any type of royalty at MSU. I’ll applaud him, but that’s about it. We probably don’t lose that Egg Bowl if we’re properly prepared. Fitz probably doesn’t get hurt. Then we go into 2018 with all those hurt WRs back plus that Guidry dude, and also Mille would have properly used Aeris and Hill in a complimentary fashion. We still probably go 10-2 max but that team would have been hell. And we’d have still been coach-less for the bowl game.
If you don't consider Mullen MSU royalty then you are just a sad sack. He has the second best record of any MSU football coach ever. You must be directly descended from Wilhelm II of Germany.

Oh, and Fitz got hurt when Ole Miss deliberately rolled up his leg. That had nothing to do with any lack of preparation. Blaming that on Mullen is asinine.
 

Howiefeltersnstch

Well-known member
Dec 28, 2019
1,219
1,423
98
I suppose Dan might have been able to improve his accuracy but the fact remains it never happened. It's a shame too. He could chuck that thing. Might be 10 rows up in the stands or hit the receiver in the helmet and knock him down. He could put some mustard on it. Course that's not good on a screen pass...lol
 

LandArchDawg

Active member
Sep 14, 2003
2,451
112
63
Back when we had an OL who could clear a Mack-truck sized running lane, even against SEC defenses.
 

bulldoghair

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2013
1,189
728
108
Nick Fitzgerald stats in 3 games vs. Texas A&M:

591 passing yards
375 rushing yards
11 Touchdowns
3wins, 0 losses
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login