We hired an outdated coach who was past his prime.
He was 59. Many coaches are hired in their late 50s and go on to their greatest runs of their careers. Nick Saban did this. So this point is false.
He achieved a 19-17 record while abandoning our bread and butter on the recruiting trail (defensive line, LB’s, offensive line, running backs)*. If anything, it should reinforce we can win in a number of ways but the ticket to our ultimate success isn’t through a traditional air raid with a stubborn coach that players (outside of QB) loathe playing in.
This is up for debate. I didn't love the hire when we made it, but I respected that Cohen was at least trying to see if MSU could become a program that can move the ball through the air. And yes, Leach recruited differently, but it wasn't vastly different than before. It was still about MS and the surrounding areas, and he also utilized the portal....immediately.
*please don’t respond with some variation of run the ball! We just need a balanced attack. It’s what good teams do.
The path to being a "good team" is different for everybody. We need whatever works, not some mythical "balance".
The Leach era gave us stagnation. We weren’t building towards anything in the way it seemed we were under Mullen. We were just going to plug and play with his system as the talent dwindled away from our program.
Another myth - the talent was not dwindling. Rankings wise, we were doing the exact same. And as far as Mullen, our fans got excited in 2009 and 2010 yes, because we were so happy to simply be competent and not at an intentional disadvantage like we were in the Croom Error. But as soon as adversity hit, we jumped off that wagon too. Never forget - the mouth breathers wanted Mullen fired late in 2013.
Our fanbase is still recovering. I went to 80% of the home games in ‘21 & ‘22, even when we were winning games, there was zero enthusiasm in our program.
I'll agree that we didn't have much excitement. But the reason we didn't are two fold. One of them is the same reason we aren't excited now - combination of being so beat up turnover/turmoil/COVID/changes, etc., and the second, is that we are stupid and didn't know what we had.
Our identity during Leach era was Mike Leach. But not in the way it was during TT or WSU days. It was more ego driven and sucked the life out of our fanbase. Our identity was “oh hey! MSU has Leach, I bet they’ll score a lot of points and be edgy and exciting!”
That's a good thing. His name cache was helping us attract better QBs and WRs. That's asinine to say that sucked the life out of the fanbase in any way. Ultimately our identity would have been winning, and that's kinda good last time I checked.
But the reality was we were carried by defense and the least explosive offense in the country by sheer numbers and also, entertainment.
Funniest thing about this is so many wanted Leach to 'modernize' or 'modify' shlt, and it's just as retarded now as it was then. He DID modify his program, to fit MSU and the players we typically get. We've ALWAYS been a defensive program, and he leaned into that. HE hired Arnett. And of course everybody realizes the offense gets better and better the longer you run it. Plug and play is a good thing at a program like MSU.
At some point, we just agree to disagree. I've told you what I thought. The majority of our fanbase doesn't really agree with me, so I took the hint - I pulled back. But I'm certainly still going to be here to point out the flaws in the stupid things we are doing.