If the AD told you that we could have either..........

cowbell9

New member
Nov 15, 2005
3,887
0
0
A. North Endzone bowled in AND 1st 3d base chairbacks

or

B. Basketball practice/multi-use facility

Construction starting next year.

Which would you take?
 

cowbell9

New member
Nov 15, 2005
3,887
0
0
A. North Endzone bowled in AND 1st 3d base chairbacks

or

B. Basketball practice/multi-use facility

Construction starting next year.

Which would you take?
 

beachbumdawg

Active member
Nov 28, 2006
2,662
350
83
before i begin thinking of bowling in the endzone......i need to see consistency.......
 

vhdawg

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2004
3,995
1,077
113
Because we have not shown that we yet need the space afforded by the football half of Option A, and as far as the baseball half goes, I'd want to ensure we would not lose capacity by doing so.</p>
 

DowntownDawg

New member
May 28, 2007
3,494
0
0
option that says "New Poll," and this feature allows you to survey the opinion of the board without creating a super long thread, while keeping track of the results so that you can get a true reading of how the board feels about your question.

Try it sometime.
 

Porkchop.sixpack

New member
Jan 23, 2007
2,524
0
0
I would choose the practice facility, but we HAVE a multi-use facility. It's the hump. The purpose of the basketball practice facility would be to permit them exclusive use of said facility.
 

Dawgbreeze

New member
Jun 11, 2007
1,655
0
0
practice facility. basketball is the only real success stroy we have had in the last decade.
 

FlabLoser

New member
Aug 20, 2006
10,709
0
0
We weren't selling out Scott Field the last time we expanded it. As soon as we expanded it, we got regular crowds greater than the pre-expansion capacity of the stadium - even throughout the one of the most pitiful stretches of W-L football in our history.

So I choose A. Increased revenue will help bring B. B will never do anything to bring on A.
 

awalkerdog

New member
Feb 18, 2007
678
0
0
North Endzone bowled in AND 1st 3d base chairbacks, A basketball facility would be nice but, expanding the Dude and bowling in the endzone would put us ahead of everybody in baseball and get us closer in football.
 

vhdawg

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2004
3,995
1,077
113
The season before the expansion began (2000), four of the five (Thanks LT!) home games' attendance was greater than the stated pre-expansion capacity of 40,656. The other (Arkansas) was during a rain/sleet/snow storm and still was over 40,000.

9/30/2000 - Florida - 43816
10/7/2000 - Auburn - 43917
10/28/2000 - MTSU - 42933
11/11/2000 - Alabama - 44114
11/18/2000 - Arkansas - 40010

In addition, two of the last three games in 1999 were over capacity. The other was on a non-Thanksgiving Thursday.

10/23/1999 - LSU - 41274
11/4/1999 - Kentucky - 39149
11/25/1999 - Mississippi - 41200
 

dawgstudent

Well-known member
Apr 15, 2003
37,268
11,993
113
so the 40,656 was incorrect. But I will agree that for SEC games, we basically sold it out - even Arkansas. Of course, playing a game that means something against an opponent that you started playing in 92 has something to do with it.
 

vhdawg

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2004
3,995
1,077
113
...out of both the 2000 regular media guide and the 2000 Independence Bowl media guide. I was actually surprised; I had thought it was 41-something thousand. In 2001, the number changed to 45,286, which I know includes the club level and skyboxes as well as the endzone bleachers.

The stadium diagram in the 2000 media guide does not show endzone bleachers, but the 2001 one does. I'm inclined to think the bleachers were installed in 2001, with the permanent installation in 2002 or 2003.

Regardless, the point remains that we had been selling the place out consistently before beginning construction on the east upper deck, and the assumption was that the W's would keep coming, and we all know what happens when you assume.</p>
 

Porkchop.sixpack

New member
Jan 23, 2007
2,524
0
0
But, generally, I agree that I think the price tag is far different for the two. However, it is possible that we can pay for the DWS work with premium seat sales (I know -- in the endzone.)
 

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
50,004
14,737
113
Not to mention the fact there is a real current need for a basketball practice facility and no real need for either bowling in the end zone or for chairbacks all the way down the 1st and 3rd base lines. We've got plenty of seating for 2,000 in our baseball stadium like it is now.
 

Porkchop.sixpack

New member
Jan 23, 2007
2,524
0
0
First, there is need for more chairbacks at DNF from what I understand. Now, if they will start auctioning off the outfield spots, I know of 4 chairbacks that will become available.

Second, if they add premium seats in the endzone expansion, there apparently is rather large demand for those. Now, I would prefer to add a club level on the west side and satiate that demand. However, if premium seating we part of the endzone expansion, it would likely be in demand, and it might would just pay for a large piece of the required fundage.

With all the said -- basketball practice facility is the way to go -- mostly so we can have practice even when Charley Pride is in town.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login