On SS930 this AM, they were talking about Federer's play this year and said that Tiger Woods is the only one that maintained that excellence. I was like no **** - it's golf. You swing a club and walk.
Clearly their size had an impact on their ability to play within their sport, but size doesn't make a damn bit of difference in golf. Size can help...but it isn't a requirement to hit a golf ball 300+ yards.<span class="post-title"><span class="post-title">What about Nate Newton, Ted Washington, etc?**
</span></span>
dawgstudent said:On SS930 this AM, they were talking about Federer's play this year and said that Tiger Woods is the only one that maintained that excellence. I was like no **** - it's golf. You swing a club and walk.
AssEndDawg said:dawgstudent said:On SS930 this AM, they were talking about Federer's play this year and said that Tiger Woods is the only one that maintained that excellence. I was like no **** - it's golf. You swing a club and walk.
While there is no doubt that golf is less physically demanding than tennis there is no sport that requires as much practice to stay consistently good. The problem with Golf is that the slightest error in muscle memory and you lose. Muscle memory is very easily forgotten so while in Tennis you have a sweet spot in the racket the size of a grapefruit golf has to deal with hitting the ball nearly perfect every single time. Not taking anything away from Tennis players, they have to deal with injuries a fatigue more than golfers, but the actual practice time of their sport doesn't come close.
</p>
Skink said:Golfers never want to admit it, but you don't have to be athletic at all to play it. Skill? Yes. Athletic ability? No.
Optimus Prime 4 said:a lot of pros think you play better walking than riding in a cart it helps get you in a better rhythm.