From beating top 10 teams in back to back games, including Clemson to losing our top offensive players to the portal and, against all odds, downgrading at OC. What a time to be alive!
No way we downgraded at OC.From beating top 10 teams in back to back games, including Clemson to losing our top offensive players to the portal and, against all odds, downgrading at OC. What a time to be alive!
At the least, it’s an emotional downgrade. On paper, at the very, very very best, it’s a lateral move. And that’s really a downgrade. If you’re not moving forward to moving backwards.No way we downgraded at OC.
More like the whirlpool of positivity being flushed down the bowl. I could not even name who is starting in the Gator Bowl. It is almost like the universe can't let South Carolina fans enjoy our last 2 wins.From beating top 10 teams in back to back games, including Clemson to losing our top offensive players to the portal and, against all odds, downgrading at OC. What a time to be alive!
If Satterfield were still here the same crap would have happened (NIL related "me attitudes") and we would KNOW we have a lousy OC.We stepped on our own cock.
If we had been able to keep Satterfield, we would at least still have some of that momentum. I think some players still leave, but I bet some players in the portal would look at those last 2 games and be willing to give us a chance. We got a ton of positive press in those last 2 weeks, and a lot of it was because of the offense.
Now, we are dealing with an almost complete unknown, and what we do know isn't exactly glowing. Nobody can look at the situation and declare where we were then to where we are now and consider that any kind of lateral move. More like, WTF happened there.
If Satterfield were still here the same crap would have happened (NIL related "me attitudes") and we would KNOW we have a lousy OC.
Would be very difficult for Loggains to be any worse, so I'm looking on the bright side.
If Satterfield were still here the same crap would have happened (NIL related "me attitudes") and we would KNOW we have a lousy OC.
Would be very difficult for Loggains to be any worse, so I'm looking on the bright side.
I'm going to support this new guy until he gives me a reason not to do so, but I don't see anything, anywhere that gives me even the slightest hint that he could even get to inconsistent. I'd never even heard of him, and nobody I knew had even heard of him. Maybe he surprises us, but it feels kinda like a hail mary, let's just throw it up and see what happens kind of situation.
That is surprisingly pessimistic. What happened to trusting in Beamer?
I trust Beamer. I trust that he went and got the best he could get, and this was probably it. I told everyone that we wouldn't be able to get the big name, splash hire that people seem to think we could get, and that's exactly what happened. Not Beamer's fault.
I would say the one positive in the last few weeks is that we unloaded Satterfield. I honestly don't think it could get much worse.
We know players were discussing leaving if he stayed, so it's impossible to know if the defections would have been worse or better.
I specifically said we didn't need splash, or a name. Just a guy who ran an aggressive offense, even if it was from a lower level.
I refuse to believe a G5 OC wouldn't want to make a leap to the SEC. That alone gets us recruits, it should get us some leeway in coaches too.
If I had to guess, Beamer was enamored with the professional experience of this guy, and places an larger emphasis on that over statistical success. If that's the case, I'm not sure i would agree, but we'll see.
Edit: I've also wondered if there's monetary restrictions too.
It absolutely can be worse. In fact, it was worse in:
2004
They would look at the SEC, but most think they can do better than us. South Carolina is a tough sell for offense. Most want a better situation because many want to move on to be head coaches and make big bucks. More history of success. More NIL resources. School like us are more likely to catch a retread looking for redemption than a up-and-coming name.
I also believe Connor Shaw's opinion is worth more than all the naysayers that have no idea of his abilitiesI specifically said we didn't need splash, or a name. Just a guy who ran an aggressive offense, even if it was from a lower level.
I refuse to believe a G5 OC wouldn't want to make a leap to the SEC. That alone gets us recruits, it should get us some leeway in coaches too.
If I had to guess, Beamer was enamored with the professional experience of this guy, and places an larger emphasis on that over statistical success. If that's the case, I'm not sure i would agree, but we'll see.
Edit: I've also wondered if there's monetary restrictions too.
I also believe Connor Shaw's opinion is worth more than all the naysayers that have no idea of his abilities