It looks like the **** is hitting the fan for MLB and NHL teams

91Joe95

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
2,843
4,067
113
A lot of local TV revenue streams about to get hammered because of potential pending broadcaster bankruptcies.


I can't help but think how shortsighted a lot these teams, especially smaller market ones, were when it came to forcing the issue regarding the consolidation of broadcasting rights.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nits74 and Shoresy

FrontierLion

Active member
Oct 12, 2021
234
451
63
Was talking about this with my wife over the weekend. The only thing keeping me from paying for an MLB TV subscription was the local blackouts of Pirates games. We have YouTube TV as our primary streaming service. YouTube never carried AT&T Sportsnet, so I unfortunately had to give up watching Pirates baseball for the past few years ... not that I missed much.

But, if MLB would step in a broadcast smaller market games - including Pittsburgh - locally through MLB TV, it would be a win-win for customers like me who cut cable long ago.

Having said that, the Pirates and other smaller market teams better get this figured out quickly. TV revenues are so crucial to organizational finances.
 

JakkL

Member
Oct 12, 2021
239
257
43
Add this as reason #37 why Nutting will NEVER pay to field a competitive team. Most team owners are willing to lose some money on their teams for vanity. Nutting uses the Pirates as his personal piggy bank.
 

Nits74

Well-known member
Oct 19, 2021
1,087
1,741
113
A lot of local TV revenue streams about to get hammered because of potential pending broadcaster bankruptcies.


I can't help but think how shortsighted a lot these teams, especially smaller market ones, were when it came to forcing the issue regarding the consolidation of broadcasting rights.
If I read this correctly, a consolidation of those rights could balance the revenue field considerably. I wonder what chance of that actually happening is. I think the powers that run MLB, including the players union, would prefer the domination by large markets to continue.
 
Last edited:

91Joe95

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
2,843
4,067
113
Right now that's only 17 (none of which are the really big teams) of the 30 teams. The other 13 are already tied up for quite some time.

I'm not exactly sure how the NHL does it but unlike MLB they do have a somewhat real version of revenue sharing. Maybe those teams weather it a bit better?
 

EPC FAN

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
678
852
93
Right now that's only 17 (none of which are the really big teams) of the 30 teams. The other 13 are already tied up for quite some time.

I'm not exactly sure how the NHL does it but unlike MLB they do have a somewhat real version of revenue sharing. Maybe those teams weather it a bit better?
Revenue sharing? Isn’t that a socialist thing?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Midnighter
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login