Milken was indicted for racketeering and securities fraud in 1989 in an insider trading investigation. In a plea bargain, he pleaded guilty to securities and reporting violations but not to racketeering or insider trading. Milken was sentenced to ten years in prison, fined $600 million (although his personal website claims $200 million)[7] and permanently barred from the securities industry by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.Worked pretty damn well for him and Michael Milken (last I saw, he was lecturing at Standford - and made a ***ton of money in some "educational enterprises")
Greed has no conscience or ethical dilemas to be concerned about.Milken was indicted for racketeering and securities fraud in 1989 in an insider trading investigation. In a plea bargain, he pleaded guilty to securities and reporting violations but not to racketeering or insider trading. Milken was sentenced to ten years in prison, fined $600 million (although his personal website claims $200 million)[7] and permanently barred from the securities industry by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Not sure of the exact number of days, but Milken did maybe a year or two.... at a CC camo (might have been Lewisburg)Milken was indicted for racketeering and securities fraud in 1989 in an insider trading investigation. In a plea bargain, he pleaded guilty to securities and reporting violations but not to racketeering or insider trading. Milken was sentenced to ten years in prison, fined $600 million (although his personal website claims $200 million)[7] and permanently barred from the securities industry by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
But it cost him between $200 and $600 million and his ability to ply his trade. My maths tells me that ain't "healthy"Not sure of the exact number of days, but Milken did maybe a year or two.... at a CC camo (might have been Lewisburg)
I wouldn't want to do that.... but he netted out a gigantic #### ton of money from that whole deal.... I expect he would do it all over again, if necessary (rather than live as a "schmuck")
His net "costs" (financially) was netting out boocoo $, even after the $200 Mill fine..... and the "can't ply his trade"? He just igniored that (as in his "educational enterprises".....)But it cost him between $200 and $600 million and his ability to ply his trade. My maths tells me that ain't "healthy"
If you are saying the his income lecturing made way more than his fines (which technically was $600 million although he said lower), I'd like to see some back up to support that.His net "costs" (financially) was netting out boocoo $, even after the $200 Mill fine..... and the "can't ply his trade"? He just igniored that (as in his "educational enterprises".....)
Some agency considered bringing new charges against him for that, but they didn't..... and he made a whole lot more boocoo $$.
I'm not saying that I would do it.... but I'd bet a guy like him would do it all over again, if necessary (but that's just a hunch)
I'm really not sure who/what you are arguing with:If you are saying the his income lecturing made way more than his fines (which technically was $600 million although he said lower), I'd like to see some back up to support that.
And I still don't see a connection between his greed and his success in educational enterprises. Seems like he could have still created that successful business without the criminal activity.
I'll stick with the original notion of, greed is not healthy.
Not sure of the exact number of days, but Milken did maybe a year or two.... at a CC camo (might have been Lewisburg)
I wouldn't want to do that.... but he netted out a gigantic #### ton of money from that whole deal.... I expect he would do it all over again, if necessary (rather than live as a "schmuck")
Milken was indicted for racketeering and securities fraud in 1989 in an insider trading investigation. In a plea bargain, he pleaded guilty to securities and reporting violations but not to racketeering or insider trading. Milken was sentenced to ten years in prison, fined $600 million (although his personal website claims $200 million)[7] and permanently barred from the securities industry by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Hear she learned her ethics from her father.““A dedicated and loving father above all else. A beautiful soul who inspired me to work hard, care harder, and always remain curious,” read a caption on a Monday Instagram post by the account associated with Marianne Boesky’s art gallery.”
OBVIOUSLY., that money thing was all just a misunderstanding.
Perhaps I misinterpreted your initial post as disagreeing with my comment "Wonder if he still thought greed was healthy"I'm really not sure who/what you are arguing with:
My points were just that:
A) All in, he made boocoo net $$ (both before and after his brief incarceration - regardless of the $200 million fine.... and I think he also had to do some restitution) - much of it due to, either directly or indirectly (from his notoriety) because of what he did (which was illegal, of course), and lived (and now lives) like royalty.
B) I would wager, though it wouldn't be my preferred tradeoff, that he would do it all over again (maybe he would, maybe he wouldn't, maybe even he couldn't answer that question in complete confidence - just that its my hunch based upon the kind of guy he seems to be)
I certainly did not ever say anything remotely similar to "greed is healthy" (not only did I never say anything like that, but I wouldn't agree with that contention)