Sorry if this was covered, but I don't think it was
https://popular.info/p/this-multi-billion-dollar-corporation
https://popular.info/p/this-multi-billion-dollar-corporation
I stopped reading when they started blaming republicans.
Siemens obviously did something ****** but Jackson has been mismanaged. When the city population shrinks so does water usage. Start working on the issues little by little. You don’t have to replace the entire system at once.
But. And here is the key part, WHY DIDNT THEY USE THE SIEMENS SETTLEMENT AS A HUGE JUMPING OFF POINT?
I stopped reading when they started blaming republicans.
Siemens obviously did something ****** but Jackson has been mismanaged. When the city population shrinks so does water usage. Start working on the issues little by little. You don’t have to replace the entire system at once.
But. And here is the key part, WHY DIDNT THEY USE THE SIEMENS SETTLEMENT AS A HUGE JUMPING OFF POINT?
The answer was in the article you didn't read.
The answer was in the article you didn't read.
Yeah I went back and finished it. Still doesn’t explain why Jackson can’t fix a problem as simple as sending a damn bill to someone after reading a meter.
Meters don’t work at all? I’m calling BS.
Replace the faulty meters over time.
Cities all over the country do it manually.
I mean you can look at the revenue coming in from x% of the people. Focus on the y% where no revenue comes in.
Then focus on getting the Siemens system working little by little.
I mean they ran a deficit for 5 years bc the idiots used expected numbers versus actual. I can see that problem for 6 months. Even a year. 2? 3? 4? Years? Is the head of the water department really that dumb? That’s a rhetorical question by the way.
Ding ding ding ding.
Definitely got shammed.
This is why the article is bullsh!t. Name the sham contractors and sham subcontractors and who approved them. I'm willing to bet many were minority owned and approved by the city.
The crazy thing about Jackson's billing is that the trash is included in your bill. With so many people not receiving and/or paying their bill, I have no clue how the city paid Waste Management unless they stole from Peter to pay Paul.
Jackson doesn’t have enough qualified people. And they certainly lack qualified leaders and department heads. One issue with the Siemens contract was the high turnover rate among Jackson employees made training on the new system almost impossible.
Jackson forced many of the minority contractors on Siemens. They wanted to be sure many of their local black buddies got a piece of the pie. Jackson has zero interest in “hiring the best and most qualified”. And that’s not changing anytime soon.
Siemens was stupid. Never walk into a big contract in a predominately black city with liberal leaders who make everything about race. It never ends well.
AMI and AMR meter systems are quirky. You have to understand them. Nobody at Jackson understood them or hung around long enough to learn. Too much turnover and too many unmotivated employees.
Siemens promised huge cost savings and accurate meter readings that would make the system pay for itself. Explain to me why getting an accurate meter reading matters when you have no intention of making the customer pay for the water used.
The system shouldn’t have cost that much anyway. $95 million for 60,000 customers is almost $1600 per customer. I assure you other utilities with a similar system didn’t pay that much. But Jackson was willing to pay more to ensure that friendly consultants got a piece of the pie.
When Phil Hull contracted to audit the system, he found entire streets that had straight-piped around the meter. And often a city employee helped them.
Word to the city. Elect and hire qualified people. Elect and hire qualified people. Elect and hire qualified people.
I can almost guarantee you there were lots of problems with the city's case. Partly because things are rarely completely one sided, but also because with a project that complex, the project was undoubtedly dependent on the city cooperating and assisting for it to be successful. What are the chances Siemens wouldn't be able to point to dozens if not more examples of city incompetence or just non-responsiveness? Even if the city's incompetence or non-responsiveness was not actually what caused the problems, that's still going to be a risk at trial.The city settled for getting their money back instead of seeking money for damages. That was dumb
Just read these two articles on Jackson waste collection from this year.
I find it almost unconscionable that any journalist can write a piece about Jackson government without mentioning that the mayor is clearly completely incompetent to run even a lemonade stand...
https://www.wlbt.com/2022/02/22/was...inst-city-jackson-over-waste-hauling-debacle/
https://www.wapt.com/article/richar...r16m-lawsuit-against-city-of-jackson/40624824
Done right, minority participation goals can be good for everyone involved, and serve an important purpose in giving minorities access to contracts they may not otherwise be able to get. Done wrong, and it's just a massive waste, fraud and corruption scheme. In my experience, we've used a minority sub on a government contract before. It worked reasonably well at first, but over time we were pressured to increase the minority participation. We were able to choose our own minority contractor and were not steered to any specific contractor.
Your links don't in any way support your assertions.
I'm not sure why that's an important purpose. I think there is some benefit to doing small business set asides in that it in theory helps promote and develop competition on non-set aside projects and also promotes upward mobility. But in general, why spend more taxpayer money to give extra money to minority contractors? It's not like you're taxing the people that discriminated against minorities in the past to pay for it. You're just screwing unrelated people (including other minorities that down own or work for the company getting the contract).
I stopped reading when they started blaming republicans.
I thought your assertion that the press didn't point out that Lumumba is incompetent was right on the money. You didn't actually assert that Lumumba was incompetent because for any reasonable person that's already a given. And as for your question "why are you here" I have the same question about several of our left leaning trolls.
Depends on what you mean by done right. If all that is required to meet your goals is showing that you did things like solicit bids from minority contractors and advertise in locations likely to be seen by minority contractors, then you are correct, it doesn't cost anything and it's a not a bad thing (not sure how much good that does though? are minority contractors really not monitoring normal bid announcements?). But usually if there is any response, there is pressure to pick a minority sub, even if they are more expensive. It's possible, but not likely, that the extra cost is coming out of the prime's pocket.Done right, it doesn't cost the taxpayers anything. The Siemens contract is a classic example of done wrong. But with reasonable minority targets (not mandatory requirements), it can and does work.
Depends on what you mean by done right. If all that is required to meet your goals is showing that you did things like solicit bids from minority contractors and advertise in locations likely to be seen by minority contractors, then you are correct, it doesn't cost anything and it's a not a bad thing (not sure how much good that does though? are minority contractors really not monitoring normal bid announcements?). But usually if there is any response, there is pressure to pick a minority sub, even if they are more expensive. It's possible, but not likely, that the extra cost is coming out of the prime's pocket.