Darryl Wilson comes to mind...name a shooter with better shooting mechanics in the last 35 years... I'll wait.
Super D was as solid of a set shooter and would make most of his open 3's. Hubbard has a jump shot that can shoot over a 6 foot 11 guy and hit it. I guess I am saying I have not seen a better jump shooter in a very, very long time.Darryl Wilson comes to mind...
Honestly, Hubbard truly reminds me a lot of Super D. Hope we get to see him play for the Maroon & White for 3 more years...
Also rebounded well for a guard. He was not a stand still spot up shooter, at all. Not even close. He was one of the first guards I can remember that would dribble up the floor and pull up off the dribble for 3 instead of attacking the lane.Super D was the most ice cold shooter I think we've ever had at State. He lived for the big games and pressure moments. He also played near-elite defense. During the '96 season, he and Whit Hughes were neck-and-neck for the team lead in charges taken. It was awesome to watch!
I'm not sure I agree with all of that. Gotta remember that Hubbard is a freshman and Super D was a senior in '96. I think Hubbard will grow into his role and if he decides to model his game after Wilson, he could be one of our all-time greats.He'd shoot circles around hubbard and honestly its not close. I like hubbard a lot, but I think because he's far and away our best shooter, makes it look like he's actually a better shooter than he is.
Supe was 40% career shooter from 3. And was nearly a 50% overall. If you watched Super D play.. its really not even close at the moment. And that was in an era where the 3 point shot wasnt as relevant as it is in todays game.I'm not sure I agree with all of that. Gotta remember that Hubbard is a freshman and Super D was a senior in '96. I think Hubbard will grow into his role and if he decides to model his game after Wilson, he could be one of our all-time greats.
Supe was 40% career shooter from 3. And was nearly a 50% overall. If you watched Super D play.. its really not even close at the moment. And that was in an era where the 3 point shot wasnt as relevant as it is in todays game.
I agree, Hubbard could, and hes got a lot of room to grow. I actually ran into Richard Williams at Harvey's and mentioned the same thing, that they were comparable.. he agreed, but that Super D was a more consistant shooter but Super D didnt get to State until he was a Soph, so the jury is still out.
As i stated earlier, hopefully he continues to work on his shot selection and overall game.... but anyone that watched Super D play and watched Hubbard of today... knows who the better shooter was.
Love Super D. And I agree with where they both stand currently. But also important to note that Hubbard is shooting from 3 feet further back than Super D. Always tough to compare eras.Supe was 40% career shooter from 3. And was nearly a 50% overall. If you watched Super D play.. its really not even close at the moment. And that was in an era where the 3 point shot wasnt as relevant as it is in todays game.
I agree, Hubbard could, and hes got a lot of room to grow. I actually ran into Richard Williams at Harvey's and mentioned the same thing, that they were comparable.. he agreed, but that Super D was a more consistant shooter but Super D didnt get to State until he was a Soph, so the jury is still out.
As i stated earlier, hopefully he continues to work on his shot selection and overall game.... but anyone that watched Super D play and watched Hubbard of today... knows who the better shooter was.
Super D was great but Jeff Malone was the best shooter I rememberSuper D was the most ice cold shooter I think we've ever had at State. He lived for the big games and pressure moments. He also played near-elite defense. During the '96 season, he and Whit Hughes were neck-and-neck for the team lead in charges taken. It was awesome to watch!
Agree, but again, you’re comparing a Fr to a Sr. I was in my 4th year at State in 96, so I remember Super D VERY well.Supe was 40% career shooter from 3. And was nearly a 50% overall. If you watched Super D play.. its really not even close at the moment. And that was in an era where the 3 point shot wasnt as relevant as it is in todays game.
I agree, Hubbard could, and hes got a lot of room to grow. I actually ran into Richard Williams at Harvey's and mentioned the same thing, that they were comparable.. he agreed, but that Super D was a more consistant shooter but Super D didnt get to State until he was a Soph, so the jury is still out.
As i stated earlier, hopefully he continues to work on his shot selection and overall game.... but anyone that watched Super D play and watched Hubbard of today... knows who the better shooter was.