Jans said he would be back for tomorrows game.Anyone know anything regarding his status? (He was not dressed last game).
From what I've read and heard - he was upset about playing time.Got to be the Moultrie knee right?
As he should be. He’s our big time scoring threat for next year along with Hubbard. He has mad offensive skills. Needs to be out there.From what I've read and heard - he was upset about playing time.
Well he must not be paying the piper to be able to get out there. I can’t imagine Jans sitting him for no good reason if he’s one of our top scorers.As he should be. He’s our big time scoring threat for next year along with Hubbard. He has mad offensive skills. Needs to be out there.
He's not one of our top scorers and I am sure Jans has his reasons. To start with, he's started off behind. Remember he was injured and didn't practice or play until a few weeks after things kicked off and missed the first five games. He's really done very little outside of the UNT game in Tupelo where he looked great. He played 23 minutes in that game and then only 26 in the next three combined. He's had a couple of defensive lapses which I am sure doesn't endear him to Jans. But he would have to be in the discussion if you wanted our best offensive lineup on the floor. Hubbard, Shak, Fort, Murphy and Tolu? We won't ever do that because Jans is unlikely to put both Cam and DJ on the bench at the same time because DEFENSE. Maybe he woudl if they both got two first half fouls and he mindlessly sat them for the rest of the half like it's a rule.Well he must not be paying the piper to be able to get out there. I can’t imagine Jans sitting him for no good reason if he’s one of our top scorers.
I would bet almost anything it's defense. Which I'm ok with. When you play a player not fully committed to defense because they're good on offense, it may make you better in the short term, but you lose something once it's known that you don't have to be committed to defense to play. And defense is just so much better when everybody on the court is committed.He's not one of our top scorers and I am sure Jans has his reasons. To start with, he's started off behind. Remember he was injured and didn't practice or play until a few weeks after things kicked off and missed the first five games. He's really done very little outside of the UNT game in Tupelo where he looked great. He played 23 minutes in that game and then only 26 in the next three combined. He's had a couple of defensive lapses which I am sure doesn't endear him to Jans. But he would have to be in the discussion if you wanted our best offensive lineup on the floor. Hubbard, Shak, Fort, Murphy and Tolu? We won't ever do that because Jans is unlikely to put both Cam and DJ on the bench at the same time because DEFENSE. Maybe he woudl if they both got two first half fouls and he mindlessly sat them for the rest of the half like it's a rule.
We missed him tremendously versus Bama and Kentucky. We can win without him against the bottom half of the league.He sure could have made the difference in the Bama game, especially second half when Tolu was in foul trouble and neither he nor Bell could get a shot off underneath. Instead, we had to give Scott those minutes.
Hope he returns soon, and that he plays satisfactory D, or whatever it is that gets him playing time. We need him.