Most coaches struggle with young, inexperienced players. Come on guys, you don't win back to back titles by being a slouch. I think he is the best floor coach in the conference. That doesn't mean he'll outcoach you and beat you every night, that means that over the long haul his teams are consistently good. If you look at the past 8-10 years Florida and UK are the two winningest SEC programs, with MSU in 3rd. That's why I like Donovan and Stansbury (and by the way, this isn't a direct comparison). Both have had their stuggles in the opening weekend of the NCAAs, Stansbury obviously more than Donovan. However, both consistently win, they win conference hardware, they get their teams to postseason play. Donovan is obviously better, but the point is both are consistent. How anyone can rag on Donovan after winning back to back titles, losing all his starters, and then falling just short of the NCAAs is beyond me.</p>