No, this is pay for play without regulation.This is about name & likeness, not stats.
bingo. They are just waiting for Kiffin to leave. Then whoever they hire will hire Cutcliff as an advisor. Arch will transfer in.Maybe the Mannings have a plan, make as much as he can before he transfers to OM
$3.2 mil is a %, a drop in the bucket, of what he's already made them.
I guarantee, everyone would want a cut if in those shoes. I would.
I'm not saying I love the new system, but I'm also not going to be hypocritical about it.
This is about name & likeness, not stats.
Why should the product, who puts in the most work, that is making so many different people millions of dollars, totaling billions, not get a piece?
Maybe the Mannings have a plan, make as much as he can before he transfers to OM
did anyone see the pic of the Ole Miss signee pulling up in a Lambo? No idea on the story. Assume that he rented it but who knows?
Hopefully he rented it. Otherwise it would have been uninsured.did anyone see the pic of the Ole Miss signee pulling up in a Lambo? No idea on the story. Assume that he rented it but who knows?
I don't think so. I think the gap is much wider than folks really think, and not only that, this is still the 'new' age of NIL. This won't continue forever, people will quit essentially setting their money on fire after a few busts.I keep saying it.. the NFL should be worried about the direction of collegiate football.
The first step is players become employees of the collectives with signed contracts.
Then one day big shots from Alabama and Ohio State sitting around a board room float the question: āWhy are we investing so much in players just for them to move on in 3-5 years?ā
Boom.. collegiate football goes to war with the NFL.
Think it canāt happen?ā¦ ask FedEX execs if they should have taken Amazon seriously about their last mile initiative.
Because just putting in time doesn't create the value. The school brand and loyalty is what generates the value. With a few exceptions, college athletes are mostly interchangeable and should make what other minor league sports players get paid (for actually playing; excluding what they get for their rights in the event they make it out of the minor leagues). If it weren't for the school loyalty, there wouldn't be any more money in college sports than there is in the XFL.$3.2 mil is a %, a drop in the bucket, of what he's already made them.
I guarantee, everyone would want a cut if in those shoes. I would.
I'm not saying I love the new system, but I'm also not going to be hypocritical about it.
This is about name & likeness, not stats.
Why should the product, who puts in the most work, that is making so many different people millions of dollars, totaling billions, not get a piece?
Maybe the Mannings have a plan, make as much as he can before he transfers to OM
Every generation has thought they were living in the pinnacle of what could possible be spent on collegiate athletics.I don't think so. I think the gap is much wider than folks really think, and not only that, this is still the 'new' age of NIL. This won't continue forever, people will quit essentially setting their money on fire after a few busts.
That's true, I'll give you that. But I sense some differences.Every generation has thought they were living in the pinnacle of what could possible be spent on collegiate athletics.
That is comparing the 2nd highest valued college football player with the NFL's Mr Irrelevant.Becoming more of a thing to keep them in college now...
Yeah, that is the ideal way NIL would be used. But how its currently being used isnt improper or really any different. By straight up just paying players thru an NIL fund, people are saying 'your name/image/likeness is valuable to the program I support so here is money for you to make an appearance on the team'.No, this is pay for play without regulation.
If it were strictly NIL, they would only be compensated for the utilization of their N, I, and L. Jersey sales, photos, autographs, speaking/special engagements, commercials, etc. And all of those "paid events" would be a part of their contracts.
Right now, they are getting unrestricted pay on hype. At least the actual pay for play in the NFL has limits (i.e. salary cap, rookie minimums, etc.)
What I'm interested to see happen is will all of this have a "trickle up" effect to the NFL. Or, will the NFL finally lobby for changes to the system once they start losing out on a couple of years of new players/hype b/c those kids could make more than a rookie staying in college.
I agree with being compensated for your N-I-L, but it's got to be regulated. You'll never convince me that they hype of Arch Manning made Texas enough money to be worthy of paying him 3.2 to sit on the bench.
Also, Purdy is nearly two years closer to signing his first free agent deal, which is when the big bucks really kick in. Plus, since he's not a first-round pick, he didn't get the fifth-year option tagged on. He'll be a UFA in 2026.That is comparing the 2nd highest valued college football player with the NFL's Mr Irrelevant.
It would be difficult to come up with a worse comparison when claiming there is more money in college than what NFL rookies get.
- Bryce Young is paid an average of $9.5MM per year. This does not include endorsements.
- Anthony Richardson is paid an average of $8.5MM per year. This does not include endorsements.
Why not compare Manning to the QBs listed above?
Additionally-
- Brock Purdy isnt a rookie. He played last season- played in the regular season and in the playoffs too.
- Manning is 18 and a freshman- he couldnt go to the NFL even if he wanted to since he doesnt qualify. You are using someone who cant go to the NFL even if they wanted to as an example to support the trend of 'keeping them in college'. He has no choice. If you want to claim players are staying in college to make more money than they would in the NFL, use players that could go to the NFL and are choosing not to. That seems pretty straight forward.
What? He hasnāt made them anything. He was on the field for 8 f-ing plays.$3.2 mil is a %, a drop in the bucket, of what he's already made them.
So broken! And sad that itās not an amateur sport any longer and the NFL has more perceived loyalty than does the NCAA.According to ESPN stats, Lil Archie was 2-5 for 30 yds and had 3 carries for 7 yds. He is an 18 yr old FR and was given $3.2M before the season started for basically 8 plays in the season and a few handoffs. College football is broken......
What? He hasnāt made them anything. He was on the field for 8 f-ing plays.