I don't get sued very often you are right about that. But I also know a shake down when I see it. And this is a shake down. You're response is just added proof to that. Keep on suing lizards.
I don’t disagree about shakedowns. I don’t disagree with where you’re coming from. I was once personally named (as an executive) in a reverse sexual discrimination lawsuit. By that I mean I had personal liability not that I was involved. And the suit revolved around a guy claiming he got unwanted oral sex from a woman. Seriously?
We had a good deal on our side but perhaps not enough on our side to get the suit dismissed. So between the company defending itself and paying other lawyers to defend the executives, we faced $300,000 to go to trial and “win” or $50,000 to settle. What do think we chose?
Our civil court system is a mess. Even when you win you often lose. You don’t have to like it and I certainly don’t like it, but unless it changes it’s what you’ve got.
Smart plaintiffs lawyers spray a gun at the wall knowing something likely results in a trial and that the defendant will settle due to basic math. In my experience frivolous lawsuits are not as common as we perceive them to be. What may appear frivolous actually has merit based on regulatory violations that most entities do not intentionally violate but are regulatory violations nonetheless.
Was sued once by a retired lawyer. In his garage he had as many as 200 cell phones with different numbers. He was banking on the fact that 10% of these 200 cell phones would get telemarketing or debt collector calls. Based on the statutes of that state the onus was on the telemarketing company or the debt collector to know when a person changed numbers. So by statute we were in violation and by statute a judge could not dismiss the case.
The guy sued us 3 times before we figured out the angle.
All I’m saying is, the rules of the game are the rules of the game. I don’t like it, but on the surface this lawsuit seems effective.
Don’t like it? Vote differently.