in any of my posts that it was because of race...BUT you cant deny that the phenomenon that is tiger doesnt have a bit to do with the fact that he is the best golfer and is BLACK. He is the most recognizable athlete in the world. Do you REALLY think that would be the case if he was white? Was Jack?..It has opened up many avenues, positive ones. You "its 2008 why does race have to play a part types" have to realize that it ALWAYS will, period. Even if it is a POSITIVE issue, race still comes to play. For instance, race shouldnt matter, but 90% of blacks vote for obama. Why? Because he is black. Nothing wrong with that, it is their vote, but race will always matter. Let me know when we quit checking boxes saying white nonhispanic, AFRICAN american, other and so on.
As for federer, i could hold his picture up to 100 folks on the street and tigers to 100 folks on the street and it wouldnt be close, and federer is the greatest tennis player ever, already. He has been more dominant than tiger has.