O/U 3 Pt attempts by Bama: 34

DawgatAuburn

Well-known member
Apr 25, 2006
10,707
1,092
113
what do they average?
They shoot around 30/game, which is top 10 in the country.
That's 47.5% of their shots being threes, which is top 25.
They are shooting 32.5%, 249th in the country.

Teams attempt about 42% of their shots from three against us, which is 274th.
Teams shoot 34.4% against us which is 236th.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dorndawg

pseudonym

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2022
3,183
4,610
113
Sears, Holloway, and Wrightsell are the three we need to defend on the perimeter.
 

Perd Hapley

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
4,028
4,394
113
Hopefully over. They shoot them about as badly as we do. The more the merrier.
 

Perd Hapley

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
4,028
4,394
113
They shoot around 30/game, which is top 10 in the country.
That's 47.5% of their shots being threes, which is top 25.
They are shooting 32.5%, 249th in the country.

Teams attempt about 42% of their shots from three against us, which is 274th.
Teams shoot 34.4% against us which is 236th.
Makes you wonder why they aren’t going after even more high percentage looks.

They are currently shooting 61% - as a team - from inside the arc. That’s absurdly good. That and pace of play is why they average 90 points per game. 1.21 PPS inside the arc.

3 point % is 32.5%. Not good at all, but they still lead the league in 3PA per game….somewhat due to pace of play, but also crappy shot selection. 0.98 PPS on 3’s. They’d need to shoot 40.5% from 3 point range, as an entire team, for them to be able to justify taking as many 3PA as 2PA. It’s weird to say about a team that scores 90 a game, but they aren’t terribly efficient offensively right now, compared to what they could be. I’d zone the hell out of them on every possession that isn’t transition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DawgatAuburn

DawgatAuburn

Well-known member
Apr 25, 2006
10,707
1,092
113
Makes you wonder why they aren’t going after even more high percentage looks.

They are currently shooting 61% - as a team - from inside the arc. That’s absurdly good. That and pace of play is why they average 90 points per game. 1.21 PPS inside the arc.

3 point % is 32.5%. Not good at all, but they still lead the league in 3PA per game….somewhat due to pace of play, but also crappy shot selection. 0.98 PPS on 3’s. They’d need to shoot 40.5% from 3 point range, as an entire team, for them to be able to justify taking as many 3PA as 2PA. It’s weird to say about a team that scores 90 a game, but they aren’t terribly efficient offensively right now, compared to what they could be. I’d zone the hell out of them on every possession that isn’t transition.
Hard to attribute their shooting struggles to shot selection but as I type that I guess you are referring to the decision to shoot that many threes instead of working for more short twos. Shot selection to me usually means either a shot taken too early in the shot clock (which they don't care about at all) or one that's forced up while being somewhat closely guarded.
 

Xenomorph

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2007
13,882
5,091
113
Makes you wonder why they aren’t going after even more high percentage looks.

They are currently shooting 61% - as a team - from inside the arc. That’s absurdly good. That and pace of play is why they average 90 points per game. 1.21 PPS inside the arc.

3 point % is 32.5%. Not good at all, but they still lead the league in 3PA per game….somewhat due to pace of play, but also crappy shot selection. 0.98 PPS on 3’s. They’d need to shoot 40.5% from 3 point range, as an entire team, for them to be able to justify taking as many 3PA as 2PA. It’s weird to say about a team that scores 90 a game, but they aren’t terribly efficient offensively right now, compared to what they could be. I’d zone the hell out of them on every possession that isn’t transition.
I wonder how their high percentage inside the arc is attributed to the unpredictable caroms from 3 so when they do get the rebound the defense isn’t in position to guard a put back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HRMSU

HRMSU

Well-known member
Apr 26, 2022
1,013
848
113
Makes you wonder why they aren’t going after even more high percentage looks.

They are currently shooting 61% - as a team - from inside the arc. That’s absurdly good. That and pace of play is why they average 90 points per game. 1.21 PPS inside the arc.

3 point % is 32.5%. Not good at all, but they still lead the league in 3PA per game….somewhat due to pace of play, but also crappy shot selection. 0.98 PPS on 3’s. They’d need to shoot 40.5% from 3 point range, as an entire team, for them to be able to justify taking as many 3PA as 2PA. It’s weird to say about a team that scores 90 a game, but they aren’t terribly efficient offensively right now, compared to what they could be. I’d zone the hell out of them on every possession that isn’t transition.
Old Temple Match up zone would be interesting for some possessions if we had it in the bag.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login