OC hire: Connor Shaw talking about Dowell?

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,176
12,168
113
Shaw posting on Twitter saying he’s hearing lots of OC noise and mentions some guy named Dowell who coached at Cleveland when he was there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Htavern

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,176
12,168
113
Oops, I see the other thread now. Didn’t know the guy’s name.

Connor says it’d be home run hire.
 

gamecock stock

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2022
2,572
2,296
113
Kurt Roper was Muschamp's first OC here. And I'm pretty certain Connor was high on Roper, who was at Cleveland the same time Connor was. I think Connor called Roper the best QB coach he ever had.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18IsTheMan

bayrooster

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2022
2,157
1,590
113
Roper? I think he might have.

I’d have to say, after all the buzz and talk, it would come across as a severely underwhelming hire to tab a TE coach from another program.
OK that settles it for me... NEXT!
 

gamecock stock

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2022
2,572
2,296
113
Here is my speculation. We aimed for Briles. He turned our offer into a big pay raise from Arkansas. Turned us down and then recommended Loggains, after coaching with him for two years. smh
 

Prestonyte

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
5,261
5,214
113
Surely Beamer knows better. Would you put your tenure in this man's hands?
 

KingWard

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2022
6,897
7,228
113
It would be very difficult to be worse.
Actually, we will have to see. But here I see another coach whose experience is way greater than his achievement. That is true of Kitchens also - they are one in the same on paper.
 

bayrooster

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2022
2,157
1,590
113
It’s the Garnet Way. Can’t think of a better way to dampen enthusiasm and totally kill Bowl attendance and donations to the athletic dept. Great job!
I hope Shaw doesn't know WTF is going on with this hire.
 

Cocky99

Well-known member
Jan 27, 2022
574
503
93
Conner Shaw also endorsed the Muschamp hire and defended it to the end. So I wouldn’t put much stock in his references.
 

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,176
12,168
113
This hire would be an epic fail. Shane cannot seriously be going this direction.
 

Prestonyte

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
5,261
5,214
113
Hopefully they are just testing fan awareness and approval and they put his name out as a "loss leader".
 

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,176
12,168
113
 
  • Like
Reactions: Prestonyte

Viennacock

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2022
2,178
2,137
113
We didn't really expect a splash hire, correct? I certainly didn't. Beamer is not a splash hire type of guy based on hires to this point. That said, he's made some very good hires to this point. I'm confident if this is his choice, he'll be a good one.
 

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,176
12,168
113
We didn't really expect a splash hire, correct? I certainly didn't. Beamer is not a splash hire type of guy based on hires to this point. That said, he's made some very good hires to this point. I'm confident if this is his choice, he'll be a good one.

I guess that's what we have to hope. I'd just like to be able to look at something in his background to get excited about.
 

Atlanta Cock

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2022
728
724
93
I guess that's what we have to hope. I'd just like to be able to look at something in his background to get excited about.
I’ve always lived by the credo that hope is not a plan. I’ve also learned that you don’t let the inmates run the asylum. Just because players “love“ someone doesn’t mean they’re worth a ****. In fact, I’ve yet to see a successful “player’s coach.”

Shane had a great shot to make a splash hire and build momentum. He hired the guy who was 32/32 in 2020 in the NFL. Hoo boy, that motivates me to travel to games and contribute to the program.
 

Lurker123

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2022
3,556
3,073
113
We didn't really expect a splash hire, correct? I certainly didn't. Beamer is not a splash hire type of guy based on hires to this point. That said, he's made some very good hires to this point. I'm confident if this is his choice, he'll be a good one.

I was hoping more for promoting a successful OC from a smaller school, someone with a history we could point to for optimism.

I guess this hire goes the "nfl experience" route, which can be sold to recruits.

Still hope this is the rumor floated so we can be excited when they announce the real hire.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Viennacock

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,176
12,168
113
I was hoping more for promoting a successful OC from a smaller school, someone with a history we could point to for optimism.

I guess this hire goes the "nfl experience" route, which can be sold to recruits.

Still hope this is the rumor floated so we can be excited when they announce the real hire.

But any recruit who looks this guy up is sure to see the "worst play caller in the NFL" that everyone else sees.

Who knows? Maybe he'll end up being fantastic. There's just nothing from his past to support that.
 

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,176
12,168
113
I’ve always lived by the credo that hope is not a plan. I’ve also learned that you don’t let the inmates run the asylum. Just because players “love“ someone doesn’t mean they’re worth a ****. In fact, I’ve yet to see a successful “player’s coach.”

Shane had a great shot to make a splash hire and build momentum. He hired the guy who was 32/32 in 2020 in the NFL. Hoo boy, that motivates me to travel to games and contribute to the program.

I suppose Beamer is hiring based on personality and fit more than credentials, which can be fine. But if you're hiring some for OC, there ought to be something from his past that shows he's capable of doing the job. Loggains may very well be a perfect fit personality-wise, but who cares if he can't call plays?

If I were a reporter, I'd ask Beamer "I under the aspect of being a personality fit for the team. However, based on Loggain's prior experience, what gives you confidence that he can be an effective OC at the collegiate level?"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Viennacock

Dewilson

Member
Feb 17, 2022
101
81
28
Roper? I think he might have.

I’d have to say, after all the buzz and talk, it would come across as a severely underwhelming hire to tab a TE coach from another program.
I agree man I am so disappointed with Shane and this hire I just don’t get it.
 

Bushmaster

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2022
524
949
93
Beamer has made mostly good hires, and seemingly has his own formula for what he believes will bring long term success. After the way we ended the season I say, Let the man do his thing. I hope it ends up being a great fit
 

Lurker123

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2022
3,556
3,073
113
Beamer has made mostly good hires, and seemingly has his own formula for what he believes will bring long term success. After the way we ended the season I say, Let the man do his thing. I hope it ends up being a great fit

Beamers one "bad" hire was a last second substitute when the current OC left. He's had time on this one, so hopefully he has good reasons.

I'm still kind of hoping this is just a rumor though.
 

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,176
12,168
113
Beamer has made mostly good hires, and seemingly has his own formula for what he believes will bring long term success. After the way we ended the season I say, Let the man do his thing. I hope it ends up being a great fit

I guess the one that gives me hope is Beamer is potentially staking his career as HC on this hire. He knows he has to get this one right. We can't be back at the OC hiring business in a couple years because this guy didn't work out. Obviously, whatever happened under Muschamp has nothing to do with Beamer, but we've installed a revolving door at the OC positions. At some point you've got to get continuity. And at some point we've got to get it right. I know Shane knows all this, so I can only hope he's really, really, really confident about this move if it takes place.
 

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,176
12,168
113
Beamers one "bad" hire was a last second substitute when the current OC left. He's had time on this one, so hopefully he has good reasons.

I'm still kind of hoping this is just a rumor though.

Agreed. Though, I think it was a mistake on his part to retain Bobo in the first place. Bobo had only been here for one season, so it wasn't a situation like retaining Cadillac Williams at Auburn. But I'm willing to chalk all that up to rookie mistakes. Satterfield was hired in a pinch, as you point out.
 

Bushmaster

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2022
524
949
93
One other thing I thought about is, how much does he align his coaching style with his father’s? I know his father had a lot of success, and at least as far as bud foster is concerned, was able to maintain consistency in winning with defense and special teams. I don’t remember who his OC or coordinators were. Maybe his formula is similar, and feels like he doesn’t need Bill Walsh, but just a solid, loyal OC
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18IsTheMan

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,176
12,168
113
One other thing I thought about is, how much does he align his coaching style with his father’s? I know his father had a lot of success, and at least as far as bud foster is concerned, was able to maintain consistency in winning with defense and special teams. I don’t remember who his OC or coordinators were. Maybe his formula is similar, and feels like he doesn’t need Bill Walsh, but just a solid, loyal OC

That could certainly be part of it. A hire like Riley or Briles is obviously not a long-term solution, as they would both be on to bigger things after a couple seasons.
 

Lurker123

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2022
3,556
3,073
113
That could certainly be part of it. A hire like Riley or Briles is obviously not a long-term solution, as they would both be on to bigger things after a couple seasons.

Losing a Coordinator who moves on because of success is not a big deal to me. That means he did good things here.
 

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,176
12,168
113
Losing a Coordinator who moves on because of success is not a big deal to me. That means he did good things here.
Yeah, I agree. I'm just noting that Beamer may not be interested in hiring someone who he KNOWS will be gone in a couple seasons in favor of someone who gives more long-term stability.
 

Lurker123

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2022
3,556
3,073
113
Yeah, I agree. I'm just noting that Beamer may not be interested in hiring someone who he KNOWS will be gone in a couple seasons in favor of someone who gives more long-term stability.
I see that, and i can understand the logic.

My personal reasoning is that oftentimes coordinators aren't long term positions. The good ones are looking for opportunities to move up.

I get the disdain for bringing in a new coordinator every year (ish) as a plug and play attempt to fix things. But I'm also not broken up by a guy coaching a couple years, doing well and moving on.

In this, I feel the coordinators spots are different from head coaching spots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18IsTheMan

Lurker123

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2022
3,556
3,073
113
Well, there's hope that "worst play caller in the NFL" translates to a good play caller at a lower level.
 

Drawplay000

New member
Jan 20, 2022
10
8
2
That could certainly be part of it. A hire like Riley or Briles is obviously not a long-term solution, as they would both be on to bigger things after a couple seasons.
So let’s just hire a guy who couldn’t score over 20 points a game in the nfl…makes sense