Didn't he say the same thing about Muschamp's first OC, whose name escapes me?Oops, I see the other thread now. Didn’t know the guy’s name.
Connor says it’d be home run hire.
Roper? I think he might have.Didn't he say the same thing about Muschamp's first OC, whose name escapes me?
OK that settles it for me... NEXT!Roper? I think he might have.
I’d have to say, after all the buzz and talk, it would come across as a severely underwhelming hire to tab a TE coach from another program.
It would be very difficult to be worse.Could be a hire of Satterfieldian proportions.
Actually, we will have to see. But here I see another coach whose experience is way greater than his achievement. That is true of Kitchens also - they are one in the same on paper.It would be very difficult to be worse.
It’s the Garnet Way. Can’t think of a better way to dampen enthusiasm and totally kill Bowl attendance and donations to the athletic dept. Great job!It would be very difficult to be worse.
I hope Shaw doesn't know WTF is going on with this hire.It’s the Garnet Way. Can’t think of a better way to dampen enthusiasm and totally kill Bowl attendance and donations to the athletic dept. Great job!
We didn't really expect a splash hire, correct? I certainly didn't. Beamer is not a splash hire type of guy based on hires to this point. That said, he's made some very good hires to this point. I'm confident if this is his choice, he'll be a good one.
I’ve always lived by the credo that hope is not a plan. I’ve also learned that you don’t let the inmates run the asylum. Just because players “love“ someone doesn’t mean they’re worth a ****. In fact, I’ve yet to see a successful “player’s coach.”I guess that's what we have to hope. I'd just like to be able to look at something in his background to get excited about.
We didn't really expect a splash hire, correct? I certainly didn't. Beamer is not a splash hire type of guy based on hires to this point. That said, he's made some very good hires to this point. I'm confident if this is his choice, he'll be a good one.
I was hoping more for promoting a successful OC from a smaller school, someone with a history we could point to for optimism.
I guess this hire goes the "nfl experience" route, which can be sold to recruits.
Still hope this is the rumor floated so we can be excited when they announce the real hire.
I’ve always lived by the credo that hope is not a plan. I’ve also learned that you don’t let the inmates run the asylum. Just because players “love“ someone doesn’t mean they’re worth a ****. In fact, I’ve yet to see a successful “player’s coach.”
Shane had a great shot to make a splash hire and build momentum. He hired the guy who was 32/32 in 2020 in the NFL. Hoo boy, that motivates me to travel to games and contribute to the program.
I agree man I am so disappointed with Shane and this hire I just don’t get it.Roper? I think he might have.
I’d have to say, after all the buzz and talk, it would come across as a severely underwhelming hire to tab a TE coach from another program.
Beamer has made mostly good hires, and seemingly has his own formula for what he believes will bring long term success. After the way we ended the season I say, Let the man do his thing. I hope it ends up being a great fit
Beamer has made mostly good hires, and seemingly has his own formula for what he believes will bring long term success. After the way we ended the season I say, Let the man do his thing. I hope it ends up being a great fit
Beamers one "bad" hire was a last second substitute when the current OC left. He's had time on this one, so hopefully he has good reasons.
I'm still kind of hoping this is just a rumor though.
One other thing I thought about is, how much does he align his coaching style with his father’s? I know his father had a lot of success, and at least as far as bud foster is concerned, was able to maintain consistency in winning with defense and special teams. I don’t remember who his OC or coordinators were. Maybe his formula is similar, and feels like he doesn’t need Bill Walsh, but just a solid, loyal OC
That could certainly be part of it. A hire like Riley or Briles is obviously not a long-term solution, as they would both be on to bigger things after a couple seasons.
Yeah, I agree. I'm just noting that Beamer may not be interested in hiring someone who he KNOWS will be gone in a couple seasons in favor of someone who gives more long-term stability.Losing a Coordinator who moves on because of success is not a big deal to me. That means he did good things here.
I see that, and i can understand the logic.Yeah, I agree. I'm just noting that Beamer may not be interested in hiring someone who he KNOWS will be gone in a couple seasons in favor of someone who gives more long-term stability.
He said roper and satterfield were great hires alsoShaw posting on Twitter saying he’s hearing lots of OC noise and mentions some guy named Dowell who coached at Cleveland when he was there.
So let’s just hire a guy who couldn’t score over 20 points a game in the nfl…makes senseThat could certainly be part of it. A hire like Riley or Briles is obviously not a long-term solution, as they would both be on to bigger things after a couple seasons.