You know I used to feel the same way growing up in hattiesburg about ol' Carl. But think about it: Ole Miss was winning nine or 10 games and going to a New Year's Day bowl every year...It would have been hard not to write a lot more about somebody winning that big. From experience I can tell you that it's a whole lot more fun to write about teams that are winning than teams that are not. One good example, in 1979, the first year I covered State as a beat, the Bulldogs went 3-8. Coaches didn't want to see you, players didn't want to see you and the fans didn't want to read what you wrote. Then State signs John Bond, and goes starts winning big in 1980. The coaches were smiling and welcoming. The players couldn't wait for interviews and the fans snatched up the newspapers to read. Just human nature, I surmise. My guess is that had State been winning nine or 10 a year in the 50s and 60s, the CL coverage would have seemed slanted in that direction...