I won’t argue whether he was good/bad as a president, but not qualified? Farmer, war hero, governor, married to the same woman for 80 years… how was he not qualified?May he rest in peace and God comfort his family.
He was a good man that was not qualified to be President. Our enemies, foreign and domestic, took advantage of this.
He was certainly over his head when he got to DC. 1976 Governors aren't like 2024 Governors. He even said this in interviews - he was over his head.I won’t argue whether he was good/bad as a president, but not qualified? Farmer, war hero, governor, married to the same woman for 80 years… how was he not qualified?
He was unfortunate in that he had several bad things happen that were not really his fault or out of his control. He was the complete opposite of Bill Clinton in many many ways. Clinton was lucky to preside over probably the most uneventful 8 years in history of the Nation.He was certainly over his head when he got to DC. 1976 Governors aren't like 2024 Governors. He even said this in interviews - he was over his head.
He gets a bad rep for being one of the worst Presidents in history but I give him the benefit of the doubt. He brought his staff from Atlanta and DC ate him alive. He won because of Watergate and was trounced in 1980.
His handlers made inflation worse, talked him into giving away the Panama Canal, and allows the crisis in Iran. I don't think he did any of it personally. I think he had terrible advisors that hated the country post-Vietnam.
Agreed. They were both Southern governors that were over their heads. One had crisis after crisis, one had the mainstreaming of computing.He was unfortunate in that he had several bad things happen that were not really his fault or out of his control. He was the complete opposite of Bill Clinton in many many ways. Clinton was lucky to preside over probably the most uneventful 8 years in history of the Nation.
17 em, he pardoned all the cowards that dodged the draft during Vietnam.Our oldest former President
War hero? He graduated from the Naval Academy in 1946 and never went to war.I won’t argue whether he was good/bad as a president, but not qualified? Farmer, war hero, governor, married to the same woman for 80 years… how was he not qualified?
A simple mistake. No malice was meant. Carter went to Annapolis but WW2 had ended and he never saw action in Korea or Vietnam.War hero? He graduated from the Naval Academy in 1946 and never went to war.
You should get into the Obit writing bizMay he rest in peace and God comfort his family.
He was a good man that was not qualified to be President. Our enemies, foreign and domestic, took advantage of this.
I was mostly referring to the Chalk River Meltdown incident that he led the repair operations of while in the Navy. Being lowered into highly radioactive water to repair a partial meltdown takes more guts than most of us have. I shouldn’t have said war hero. My apologies.A simple mistake. No malice was meant. Carter went to Annapolis but WW2 had ended and he never saw action in Korea or Vietnam.
Unqualified may have been a tough word, but who is qualified? I stand by the point that he was in over his head, and his staff from Georgia got railroaded. Carter had a very interesting relationship with Congress. They hated each other and it caused things to get worse.I was mostly referring to the Chalk River Meltdown incident that he led the repair operations of while in the Navy. Being lowered into highly radioactive water to repair a partial meltdown takes more guts than most of us have. I shouldn’t have said war hero. My apologies.
Failed to grasp the width and depth of the presidency at that time but a great human beingOur oldest former President
He made the worst mistake an American politician can make. He was authentic.May he rest in peace and God comfort his family.
He was a good man that was not qualified to be President. Our enemies, foreign and domestic, took advantage of this.
Including the ones who joined the National Guard?17 em, he pardoned all the cowards that dodged the draft during Vietnam.
The US shouldn't have had control of the Canal in the first place. It was a complete sham of an agreement that allowed the US to have it in the first place.He was certainly over his head when he got to DC. 1976 Governors aren't like 2024 Governors. He even said this in interviews - he was over his head.
He gets a bad rep for being one of the worst Presidents in history but I give him the benefit of the doubt. He brought his staff from Atlanta and DC ate him alive. He won because of Watergate and was trounced in 1980.
His handlers made inflation worse, talked him into giving away the Panama Canal, and allows the crisis in Iran. I don't think he did any of it personally. I think he had terrible advisors that hated the country post-Vietnam.
9,000 guard members served in Vietnam and 156 were killed. Plus they had to take care of civil unrest such as Kent State.Including the ones who joined the National Guard?
The whole point is we made it happen. There would not even be a country named Panama but for us. Who would have dug it out and built it ? The Colombians ? None of those countries could have accomplished such an amazing feat. And yes we wanted it and created it for our own benefit. Why is that a bad thing ?The US shouldn't have had control of the Canal in the first place. It was a complete sham of an agreement that allowed the US to have it in the first place.
I genuinely think that anyone who has read how the Canal came to be will conclude the US' actions were shady as 17 and unethical.
If they don't, I genuinely believe it is just them being inconsistent and dismissive in order to maintain a narrative they need to cling to.
Carter seemed like a genuinely great person who didnt succeed in DC. He has some stuff to be blamed for, but Panama isn't one. We shouldn't have ever controlled it in the first place, much less after how we made it happen.
Petty much on any subject your view seems wrong.The US shouldn't have had control of the Canal in the first place. It was a complete sham of an agreement that allowed the US to have it in the first place.
I genuinely think that anyone who has read how the Canal came to be will conclude the US' actions were shady as 17 and unethical.
If they don't, I genuinely believe it is just them being inconsistent and dismissive in order to maintain a narrative they need to cling to.
Carter seemed like a genuinely great person who didnt succeed in DC. He has some stuff to be blamed for, but Panama isn't one. We shouldn't have ever controlled it in the first place, much less after how we made it happen.
Odd, I thought we paid for the canal to be built, protected it during WW2, Korean War and Vietnam and up to the time it was turned over.The US shouldn't have had control of the Canal in the first place. It was a complete sham of an agreement that allowed the US to have it in the first place.
I genuinely think that anyone who has read how the Canal came to be will conclude the US' actions were shady as 17 and unethical.
If they don't, I genuinely believe it is just them being inconsistent and dismissive in order to maintain a narrative they need to cling to.
Carter seemed like a genuinely great person who didnt succeed in DC. He has some stuff to be blamed for, but Panama isn't one. We shouldn't have ever controlled it in the first place, much less after how we made it happen.
Nothing wrong with the Guard, they do not determine where they will be deployed just like the regulars don't .Including the ones who joined the National Guard?
It wouldn’t exist if not for the US.The US shouldn't have had control of the Canal in the first place. It was a complete sham of an agreement that allowed the US to have it in the first place.
I genuinely think that anyone who has read how the Canal came to be will conclude the US' actions were shady as 17 and unethical.
If they don't, I genuinely believe it is just them being inconsistent and dismissive in order to maintain a narrative they need to cling to.
So ends justify the means.It wouldn’t exist if not for the US.
Did you do a co-op year in France and take US History while you were there, buy any chance?The US shouldn't have had control of the Canal in the first place. It was a complete sham of an agreement that allowed the US to have it in the first place.
I genuinely think that anyone who has read how the Canal came to be will conclude the US' actions were shady as 17 and unethical.
If they don't, I genuinely believe it is just them being inconsistent and dismissive in order to maintain a narrative they need to cling to.
Carter seemed like a genuinely great person who didnt succeed in DC. He has some stuff to be blamed for, but Panama isn't one. We shouldn't have ever controlled it in the first place, much less after how we made it happen.
Who would have built it, then?So ends justify the means.
Your comment is simply incorrect - you don't know it wouldn't exist.
But even if it didn't exist, that doesn't mean what the US did was justified.
We signed an agreement with someone from 17ing France the night before a meeting and then said 'yep, that agreement holds up' when Panama's delegation came to the US.
Really? Tens of thousands dodged Vietnam by joining the guard. That includes George W as well as my father. I say this as a national guard veteran myself. The guard today is barely even related to the Vietnam era guard. It was as much a dodge as moving to Canada. Just for those who couldn’t afford the move for whatever reason. Who can blame them? A terrible war for no damn good reason.9,000 guard members served in Vietnam and 156 were killed. Plus they had to take care of civil unrest such as Kent State.
We created Panama. It wouldn’t exist without us. We also built the canal. The canal made this country what it is. It is STILL of utmost strategic importance to us. We should have fought to keep it if necessary. The zone should have become a state. Carter was a dang idiot. He was one of the worst of all our presidents and he is responsible for a lot of the current mess the world is in. He has also been a pretty bad ex-president. He has lent legitimacy to some very bad actors over the years. The damage he has done is almost incalculable.The US shouldn't have had control of the Canal in the first place. It was a complete sham of an agreement that allowed the US to have it in the first place.
I genuinely think that anyone who has read how the Canal came to be will conclude the US' actions were shady as 17 and unethical.
If they don't, I genuinely believe it is just them being inconsistent and dismissive in order to maintain a narrative they need to cling to.
Carter seemed like a genuinely great person who didnt succeed in DC. He has some stuff to be blamed for, but Panama isn't one. We shouldn't have ever controlled it in the first place, much less after how we made it happen.
I don’t really have a problem with the decision to turn it over to Panama but there were pretty valid reasons why they had control of it in the first place.The US shouldn't have had control of the Canal in the first place. It was a complete sham of an agreement that allowed the US to have it in the first place.
I genuinely think that anyone who has read how the Canal came to be will conclude the US' actions were shady as 17 and unethical.
If they don't, I genuinely believe it is just them being inconsistent and dismissive in order to maintain a narrative they need to cling to.
The second worst president in history behind Joe Biden.Our oldest former President
Happens in every presidency, unfortunately. Like dude in Rudy said, the only person you have to prove something to in this life is yourself.He increased military funding for arms that Ronald Reagan took credit for, later. But, it’s the economy stupid.
KReally? Tens of thousands dodged Vietnam by joining the guard. That includes George W as well as my father. I say this as a national guard veteran myself. The guard today is barely even related to the Vietnam era guard. It was as much a dodge as moving to Canada. Just for those who couldn’t afford the move for whatever reason. Who can blame them? A terrible war for no damn good reason.