OT: MLB: This may be the strangest ejection I've ever seen

92Pony

Joined Jan 18, 2011
Jan 20, 2022
2,466
6,509
113
I'd like to know the whole story there. Did the catcher actually do that to be a smart*** or show the ump up, or was there a legit reason that he turned his glove away?

Okay, now that I actually watch it with the sound turned up ( :LOL: ), it seems likely to be a innocent misunderstanding by the catcher, thinking that the ump (who he WASN'T even looking back at) was throwing the ball to the pitcher, as the announcers noted he had done previously. Looks like a classic case of an ump making it all about himself.
 

Viennacock

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2022
2,169
2,137
113
I'd like to know the whole story there. Did the catcher actually do that to be a smart*** or show the ump up, or was there a legit reason that he turned his glove away?

Okay, now that I actually watch it with the sound turned up ( :LOL: ), it seems likely to be a innocent misunderstanding by the catcher, thinking that the ump (who he WASN'T even looking back at) was throwing the ball to the pitcher, as the announcers noted he had done previously. Looks like a classic case of an ump making it all about himself.
Umps seem to think the game is about them.
 

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,170
12,159
113
I'd like to know the whole story there. Did the catcher actually do that to be a smart*** or show the ump up, or was there a legit reason that he turned his glove away?

Okay, now that I actually watch it with the sound turned up ( :LOL: ), it seems likely to be a innocent misunderstanding by the catcher, thinking that the ump (who he WASN'T even looking back at) was throwing the ball to the pitcher, as the announcers noted he had done previously. Looks like a classic case of an ump making it all about himself.

Yeah, it's definitely a weird one. I've watched A TON of baseball and have never seen such a thing. I would guess there wasn't much fuss over it since it was just a late spring training game.

Seems totally innocent to me. You can tell he's expecting the ball, but then pulls his glove away and looks down when he realizes the ump dropped the ball. The announcers mentioned that after the previous pitch, the ump had thrown the ball directly to the catcher instead of giving it to the catcher, so the catcher was probably unsure what the ump was gonna do. And he wasn't even looking at the ump, so he had no way of knowing that he was pulling his glove away at the exact moment the ump was giving him the ball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 92Pony

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,170
12,159
113
Eject the ump

I'm sure he got a talking to by someone after the game. Hope so at least. Missing balls and strikes is one thing...part of the game. Tossing a guy for no apparent reason whatsoever is a different thing entirely.
Dude! That Ump needs a big time out! Suspend him for a bit. Hotheads don't make good umps.

Definitely seemed like a emotional, knee-jerk reaction. Like if you're a parent and you overreact to something your kid does, but to maintain your air of authority you feel compelled to double down and stick with your initial reaction.
 

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,170
12,159
113
Ha, well I guess he's not gonna corrected on this one:

"Crew chief Dan Iassogna defended Rosenberg's decision to the Inquirer after the game. Did Randy act hastily? No," Iassogna said. "I believe Randy felt like the situation warranted an ejection, and that's what he did."

LOL, how could you describe it as anything BUT hastily? I guess, presumably, the umps are saying it had to do with a clock violation. Seems they are suggesting it was an attempt by Realmuto to stall, which it obviously was not. Umps stick by their own, that's for sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vacock

bayrooster

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2022
2,156
1,590
113
Ha, well I guess he's not gonna corrected on this one:

"Crew chief Dan Iassogna defended Rosenberg's decision to the Inquirer after the game. Did Randy act hastily? No," Iassogna said. "I believe Randy felt like the situation warranted an ejection, and that's what he did."

LOL, how could you describe it as anything BUT hastily? I guess, presumably, the umps are saying it had to do with a clock violation. Seems they are suggesting it was an attempt by Realmuto to stall, which it obviously was not. Umps stick by their own, that's for sure.
I see Dan's progenitors wisely changed the spelling from Lasagna to Lassogna. :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18IsTheMan

Viennacock

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2022
2,169
2,137
113
Ha, well I guess he's not gonna corrected on this one:

"Crew chief Dan Iassogna defended Rosenberg's decision to the Inquirer after the game. Did Randy act hastily? No," Iassogna said. "I believe Randy felt like the situation warranted an ejection, and that's what he did."

LOL, how could you describe it as anything BUT hastily? I guess, presumably, the umps are saying it had to do with a clock violation. Seems they are suggesting it was an attempt by Realmuto to stall, which it obviously was not. Umps stick by their own, that's for sure.
MLB needs to admit they have a problem prior to correcting the problem. Example #1- Angel Hernandez.