Umps seem to think the game is about them.I'd like to know the whole story there. Did the catcher actually do that to be a smart*** or show the ump up, or was there a legit reason that he turned his glove away?
Okay, now that I actually watch it with the sound turned up (), it seems likely to be a innocent misunderstanding by the catcher, thinking that the ump (who he WASN'T even looking back at) was throwing the ball to the pitcher, as the announcers noted he had done previously. Looks like a classic case of an ump making it all about himself.
I'd like to know the whole story there. Did the catcher actually do that to be a smart*** or show the ump up, or was there a legit reason that he turned his glove away?
Okay, now that I actually watch it with the sound turned up (), it seems likely to be a innocent misunderstanding by the catcher, thinking that the ump (who he WASN'T even looking back at) was throwing the ball to the pitcher, as the announcers noted he had done previously. Looks like a classic case of an ump making it all about himself.
And heaven forbid we check their work with an electronic strike zone.Umps seem to think the game is about them.
Eject the ump
Dude! That Ump needs a big time out! Suspend him for a bit. Hotheads don't make good umps.
I see Dan's progenitors wisely changed the spelling from Lasagna to Lassogna.Ha, well I guess he's not gonna corrected on this one:
"Crew chief Dan Iassogna defended Rosenberg's decision to the Inquirer after the game. Did Randy act hastily? No," Iassogna said. "I believe Randy felt like the situation warranted an ejection, and that's what he did."
LOL, how could you describe it as anything BUT hastily? I guess, presumably, the umps are saying it had to do with a clock violation. Seems they are suggesting it was an attempt by Realmuto to stall, which it obviously was not. Umps stick by their own, that's for sure.
MLB needs to admit they have a problem prior to correcting the problem. Example #1- Angel Hernandez.Ha, well I guess he's not gonna corrected on this one:
"Crew chief Dan Iassogna defended Rosenberg's decision to the Inquirer after the game. Did Randy act hastily? No," Iassogna said. "I believe Randy felt like the situation warranted an ejection, and that's what he did."
LOL, how could you describe it as anything BUT hastily? I guess, presumably, the umps are saying it had to do with a clock violation. Seems they are suggesting it was an attempt by Realmuto to stall, which it obviously was not. Umps stick by their own, that's for sure.
If I was that catcher, not a chance I would ever ask for a ball againI guess all catchers need to never ask the ump for a new ball and just let the ump throw it in the future....