OT: Social media cancel culture targets Little League players

Zenophile

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
1,122
3,518
113
Make no mistake, my experience with Iowans would suggest that many are indeed pretty vile, but going after kids crosses a bright line of distinction. Apparently expressing outrage as a pretense to caring about children is so 10 years ago. In 2022 they're the targets.



 
Last edited:

Midnighter

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
9,627
15,373
113
Make no mistake, my experience with Iowans would suggest that many are indeed pretty vile, but going after kids crosses a bright line of distinction. Apparently expressing outrage as a pretense to caring about kids is so 10 years ago. In 2022 they're the targets.





Has anyone takes to the kids, or parents of the kids, about the context here? Big difference between ‘Hey - we’re bored in the dugout; let’s see how many cotton balls we can put on someone’s head,’ to ‘Hey - we’re bored in the dugout; might be fun to put cotton balls on Johnny’s head because he’s black and slavery and all.’ It’s cringy and inappropriate either way, but maybe find out more before crushing the pearls around your neck, you know?

Edit: I see the parents said there was no I’ll intent. Ok - moving on…
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bison13

Zenophile

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
1,122
3,518
113
Has anyone takes to the kids, or parents of the kids, about the context here? Big difference between ‘Hey - we’re bored in the dugout; let’s see how many cotton balls we can put on someone’s head,’ to ‘Hey - we’re bored in the dugout; might be fun to put cotton balls on Johnny’s head because he’s black and slavery and all.’ It’s cringy and inappropriate either way, but maybe find out more before crushing the pearls around your neck, you know?

Edit: I see the parents said there was no I’ll intent. Ok - moving on…
You've illustrated the issue magnificently. The virtual mob only seeks instant justice, context be damned,
 

WVilleLion

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2021
734
1,055
93
Has anyone takes to the kids, or parents of the kids, about the context here? Big difference between ‘Hey - we’re bored in the dugout; let’s see how many cotton balls we can put on someone’s head,’ to ‘Hey - we’re bored in the dugout; might be fun to put cotton balls on Johnny’s head because he’s black and slavery and all.’ It’s cringy and inappropriate either way, but maybe find out more before crushing the pearls around your neck, you know?

Edit: I see the parents said there was no I’ll intent. Ok - moving on…
Maybe you should read all of the information before you say it is cringy, etc.
 

WVilleLion

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2021
734
1,055
93
I saw one website blog trying to stir the pot by saying that the young black player was “humiliated “ by his white teammates. 🙄
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bison13

Midnighter

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
9,627
15,373
113
Maybe you should read all of the information before you say it is cringy, etc.

Still cringy whether parents think there is no ill intent. Bunch of white kids putting ‘cotton’ on a black kids head is not a good look. My point was maybe spare the ‘cancel kids’ effort since they’re probably not fully up to speed on the connotation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OuiRPSU

NittPicker

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
4,208
8,539
113
Another case of adults effing things up. Kids were putting fill from a stuffed animal onto the head of another kid. It wasn't "cotton balls". But hey, it looked like cotton and the kid was black so a heinous offense must have been taking place. I'm sure nobody asked the kids what was going on.
 

s1uggo72

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,531
4,335
113
Another case of adults effing things up. Kids were putting fill from a stuffed animal onto the head of another kid. It wasn't "cotton balls". But hey, it looked like cotton and the kid was black so a heinous offense must have been taking place. I'm sure nobody asked the kids what was going on.
First rule of baseball. Don’t look in the dugout
 

Lion84

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
386
579
93
Still cringy whether parents think there is no ill intent. Bunch of white kids putting ‘cotton’ on a black kids head is not a good look. My point was maybe spare the ‘cancel kids’ effort since they’re probably not fully up to speed on the connotation.
They also did it to white kids but of course they didn't show that picture and by the way they did it to imitate a star pitcher from Hawaii who had a white dyed mowhawk but let's make sure facts don't in the way of outrage - the probem is today everyone seeks to get outraged before they have a iota of facts around something - thanks you yellow journalism.
 

BobPSU92

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
17,212
26,075
113
They also did it to white kids but of course they didn't show that picture and by the way they did it to imitate a star pitcher from Hawaii who had a white dyed mowhawk but let's make sure facts don't in the way of outrage - the probem is today everyone seeks to get outraged before they have a iota of facts around something - thanks you yellow journalism.

Society today just sucks.
 

Liontown

Well-known member
Nov 2, 2021
438
506
93
Has anyone takes to the kids, or parents of the kids, about the context here? Big difference between ‘Hey - we’re bored in the dugout; let’s see how many cotton balls we can put on someone’s head,’ to ‘Hey - we’re bored in the dugout; might be fun to put cotton balls on Johnny’s head because he’s black and slavery and all.’ It’s cringy and inappropriate either way, but maybe find out more before crushing the pearls around your neck, you know?

Edit: I see the parents said there was no I’ll intent. Ok - moving on…

Midnighter always needs something to whine about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WVilleLion

bbrown

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2021
9,908
20,798
113
Make no mistake, my experience with Iowans would suggest that many are indeed pretty vile, but going after kids crosses a bright line of distinction. Apparently expressing outrage as a pretense to caring about children is so 10 years ago. In 2022 they're the targets.




backing up homer simpson GIF
 
  • Like
Reactions: LaJollaCreek

NittPicker

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
4,208
8,539
113
Has anyone takes to the kids, or parents of the kids, about the context here? Big difference between ‘Hey - we’re bored in the dugout; let’s see how many cotton balls we can put on someone’s head,’ to ‘Hey - we’re bored in the dugout; might be fun to put cotton balls on Johnny’s head because he’s black and slavery and all.’ It’s cringy and inappropriate either way, but maybe find out more before crushing the pearls around your neck, you know?

Edit: I see the parents said there was no I’ll intent. Ok - moving on…
What a cop out. You claim it was "cringy and inappropriate either way". Then you edit and say there was no ill intent so just move on. So then you really didn't feel it was "cringy and inappropriate either way"? Or did you simply succumb to the initial outrage by others?
 

Midnighter

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
9,627
15,373
113
What a cop out. You claim it was "cringy and inappropriate either way". Then you edit and say there was no ill intent so just move on. So then you really didn't feel it was "cringy and inappropriate either way"? Or did you simply succumb to the initial outrage by others?

Those aren't mutually exclusive ideas. I think both that it is cringy and inappropriate but also not worthy of the ire drawn by the media, cancel culture, etc. Learning experience for the kids who were unaware of the problematic optics of their stunt, which did not appear to be malicious or harmful (noting good intentions don't protect you from unintended consequences; see any 'theme' parties at colleges, clothing labels putting models of color in ads that dredge up certain imagery or connotations, etc.).
 

WVilleLion

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2021
734
1,055
93
Still cringy whether parents think there is no ill intent. Bunch of white kids putting ‘cotton’ on a black kids head is not a good look. My point was maybe spare the ‘cancel kids’ effort since they’re probably not fully up to speed on the connotation.
Actually not cringy are all if you hear the whole story. Heard it on TV and it made sense as to what the kids were doing and why they were doing it. Not to mention that was not the only player with the cotton balls on their head. If you find it cringy and inappropriate, you are part of the issue.

I agree that trying to do the cancel thing with kids is BS.
 

nittanyfan333

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
2,883
5,682
113
I guess my question is, when do we just go ahead and make kids stop being kids? At what point is society just ruining innocence?
 
  • Like
Reactions: WVilleLion

Grant Green

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
2,509
3,420
113
I guess my question is, when do we just go ahead and make kids stop being kids? At what point is society just ruining innocence?
Follow up question. Why do we care so much about what a few people say on twitter about a story that will last about 24 hours?
I'm willing to bet that adults are taking this way harder than the kids actually involved.
 

Zenophile

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
1,122
3,518
113
Follow up question. Why do we care so much about what a few people say on twitter about a story that will last about 24 hours?
I'm willing to bet that adults are taking this way harder than the kids actually involved.
Fair question. When I saw this story reported this AM, I was legitimately disgusted at the notion of children being targeted on social media. Perhaps I should have taken another breath (note: I did take one) before memorializing my reaction in a post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grant Green

nittanyfan333

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
2,883
5,682
113
Follow up question. Why do we care so much about what a few people say on twitter about a story that will last about 24 hours?
I'm willing to bet that adults are taking this way harder than the kids actually involved.

Oh I don’t disagree. But this is a microcosm of a bigger issue. In todays social media world we live in, unless your kids are living under a rock, societal influence is everywhere. However big “society” is, it’s not only teaching kids that the boogeyman exists, but it’s teaching them to look for it. Which goes to my original question of ruining childlike innocence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WVilleLion

BobPSU92

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
17,212
26,075
113
Follow up question. Why do we care so much about what a few people say on twitter about a story that will last about 24 hours?
I'm willing to bet that adults are taking this way harder than the kids actually involved.

Lives can easily be destroyed in far less than 24 hours on social media.

(General statement. Not implying that the kids’ lives will be ruined in this case.)
 

Grant Green

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
2,509
3,420
113
Oh I don’t disagree. But this is a microcosm of a bigger issue. In todays social media world we live in, unless your kids are living under a rock, societal influence is everywhere. However big “society” is, it’s not only teaching kids that the boogeyman exists, but it’s teaching them to look for it. Which goes to my original question of ruining childlike innocence.
Frankly, the kids of today are much better equipped to deal with this stuff than the adults.
(General statement. Not implying that the kids’ lives will be ruined in this case.)
Then save the outrage for a case that is actually significant. I see little difference between the people being outraged by silly things and the people who are outraged by those people.
 

nittanyfan333

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
2,883
5,682
113
Frankly, the kids of today are much better equipped to deal with this stuff than the adults.

Disagree


And it’s getting worse

 
  • Like
Reactions: BobPSU92

WVilleLion

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2021
734
1,055
93
Sure they are better equipped. They can be harassed 24/7 and if it gets too rough, some doc will just assign some medication to help them cope. 🙄
 

Grant Green

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
2,509
3,420
113
Disagree


And it’s getting worse

Neither articles cites cancel culture as an influencing factor. You seem to be arguing more about social media pressures, such as cyber bullying, than cancel culture.
And PS. I think if you look at suicide rates, you'll find other age groups have increased as well and are all higher than the 15-24 age group.
 
Last edited:

nittanyfan333

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
2,883
5,682
113
Neither articles cites cancel culture as an influencing factor. You seem to be arguing more about social media pressures, such as cyber bullying, than cancel culture.
And PS. I think if you look at suicide rates, you'll find other age groups have increased as well and are all higher than the 15-24 age group.

I’m not arguing causation. This started with me saying kids aren’t immune from societal pressure. You said they were more equipped to handle assuming since you quoted me you were referring to societal pressure). I said (based on increased suicide rates) that I disagree, kids aren’t better equipped to handle societal pressure.

and yes, all suicide rates have risen in the past 10 years, but none as sharply as the 15-24 age group. 25-34 is close but it’s not.

This LLWS issue notwithstanding, my belief is that these hyperbolic responses to innocent kids having fun are nothing but bad, and an issue that needs to be dealt with.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login