OT: why is Pete Rose still banned?

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,098
12,113
113
A player for the Rockies just signed an endorsement deal with a bookmaker. Granted, endorsing a bookmaker isn't the same as actually betting on the game, but it's a fairly thin line, as the article below makes note. You can't bet on the game but you can endorse betting on the game. For MLB making the Pete Rose issue a hill to die on, this is a perilously fine line.

 

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,098
12,113
113
then you must be new around here. A Pete Rose thread is going to appear about every 3-4 months.

Blackmon is the first ever MLB player in history to endorse a bookmaker. That's a major shift in the narrative and I don't think there's ever been a thread about that topic. Has there? Link to share?

With MLB now openly embracing and endorsing betting on the game, it gets considerably harder to defend Rose's ban. The line is getting more and more narrow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: York cock

KingWard

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2022
6,851
7,197
113
I was wondering, is their any rule prohibiting a college player from accepting an NIL deal with enterprises connected with gambling?
 
  • Like
Reactions: vacock

CockofEarle

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2022
1,068
707
113
A player for the Rockies just signed an endorsement deal with a bookmaker. Granted, endorsing a bookmaker isn't the same as actually betting on the game, but it's a fairly thin line, as the article below makes note. You can't bet on the game but you can endorse betting on the game. For MLB making the Pete Rose issue a hill to die on, this is a perilously fine line.

Greatest player I’ve ever watched start to finish……..not to mention 3 great incidents @ Fulton county stadium.
 

Thunderstick

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2022
803
578
93
Blackmon is the first ever MLB player in history to endorse a bookmaker. That's a major shift in the narrative and I don't think there's ever been a thread about that topic. Has there? Link to share?

With MLB now openly embracing and endorsing betting on the game, it gets considerably harder to defend Rose's ban. The line is getting more and more narrow.
I don't care for Pete Rose and I haven't followed MLB in years, but, I suspect you're correct. Today's society is much more lenient than in yesteryears.
 

Thunderstick

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2022
803
578
93
More lenient in some ways, and less so in others.
A good point. Today's generation might be "traumatized" by Rose's actions and would not be lenient. This would necessitate a need for "safe spaces" in our ballparks.
 

ToddFlanders

Well-known member
Jan 20, 2022
947
936
93
I think the bans should truly be a "lifetime ban" - and after they die they're available for enshrinement in the Hall if their career warrants it.
 

Pepsicock

Joined May 12, 2006
Jan 17, 2022
15,703
35,791
113
Jackson always publicly maintained his innocence and insisted until his death that he was playing his best in the Series. He had a.375 batting average, threw out five baserunners, and handled thirty chances in the outfield with no errors during that series.
 

Surfincock

Member
Feb 3, 2022
41
33
18
The Raiders are in Vegas now, that says something to me. The sports betting industry is still in an infant stage here. It will affect the game in ways we don't know yet. The major leagues have to keep the idea that integrity of the competition is not compromised. Shoeless and Rose will never get in but there are lots of scandals coming. Many athletes have gambling addictions, just like everybody else.
 

Pepsicock

Joined May 12, 2006
Jan 17, 2022
15,703
35,791
113
The Raiders are in Vegas now, that says something to me. The sports betting industry is still in an infant stage here. It will affect the game in ways we don't know yet. The major leagues have to keep the idea that integrity of the competition is not compromised. Shoeless and Rose will never get in but there are lots of scandals coming. Many athletes have gambling addictions, just like everybody else.
Shoeless Joe Jackson didn't gamble. He just signed a paper and didn't know how to read. How did he throw the WS batting .375 ?
 

Surfincock

Member
Feb 3, 2022
41
33
18
Shoeless Joe Jackson didn't gamble. He just signed a paper and didn't know how to read. How did he throw the WS batting .375 ?
No I am not saying he did. I mean to say that they will go to the extreme to ensure the integrity of the game is not compromised. By letting Shoeless in there is always going to be a doubt but not letting him in keeps them free of condoning any possibilty of cheating. I grew up where Shoeless played in the mill league in Spartanburg-Greenville and signed several petitions to try and get him in the Hall of Fame. I don't believe he cheated but I also don't think he will ever get in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pepsicock

Aspencock

Joined Jun 6, 2016
Jan 21, 2022
789
1,643
93
He bet on his own team which is the worst thing you can do no matter which way you go. It’s stepping over the line in a big way that baseball said you can never do or face a lifetime ban and he did it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Harvard Gamecock

Carolina Steve

Joined Sep 1, 2006 • Garnet Trust Supporter
Jan 22, 2022
5,828
9,764
113
No I am not saying he did. I mean to say that they will go to the extreme to ensure the integrity of the game is not compromised. By letting Shoeless in there is always going to be a doubt but not letting him in keeps them free of condoning any possibilty of cheating. I grew up where Shoeless played in the mill league in Spartanburg-Greenville and signed several petitions to try and get him in the Hall of Fame. I don't believe he cheated but I also don't think he will ever get in.
If you played at the Monaghan Y , we probably ran across each other
 

Cocky Jeff

Joined Jan 30, 2003
Jan 22, 2022
5,736
10,967
113
I don't think they are embracing, promoting or endorsing betting by active MLB players.
True….but I bet Charlie hustle never bet on his team to lose. I mean this is the guy who plowed over the catcher in what has now become meaningless, an all star game.
 

Prestonite

Member
Feb 1, 2022
172
181
43
A player for the Rockies just signed an endorsement deal with a bookmaker. Granted, endorsing a bookmaker isn't the same as actually betting on the game, but it's a fairly thin line, as the article below makes note. You can't bet on the game but you can endorse betting on the game. For MLB making the Pete Rose issue a hill to die on, this is a perilously fine line.

He obviously had some enemies in the commissioner's office. Made somebody really mad and they haven't forgotten or forgiven.
 

BattleshipTexas

Active member
Jan 23, 2022
304
263
63
True….but I bet Charlie hustle never bet on his team to lose. I mean this is the guy who plowed over the catcher in what has now become meaningless, an all star game.
I have heard he never bet against his team, but he did bet on baseball, including betting on his team (to win). He knew that was prohibited, he admitted he knew, but did it anyway.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login