I listened to a fascinating lecture by Lex Fridman, understood very little although that topic was interesting yet confusing.
You should have watched Young Shelton, they discussed that tonight
Yeah, but everybody knows that.If the poster doesn't understand the following, he has no reason to ask.
Pretty straightforward. Currently, we use NAD 83 in our vertical geometry.
Gravity waves, find a hippie from my generation.
..
Abstract: In 2022, the National Geodetic Survey (NGS) will replace all components of the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS), including NAD 83 and NAVD 88, with a new system that is geocentric, time-dependent, and not reliant upon passive control. Every survey, map or geolocation created today will be incompatible with the new system by as much as 4 meters, depending on where in the United States you are working. This misalignment could apply to every latitude and/or longitude and/or height in your work.
In order to assist users in understanding and adapting to the new system, two technical reports were released by NGS in 2017, under the title “Blueprint for 2022”, with a third, companion report in the works. The first two reports provide the scientific and definitional aspects of four new time-dependent terrestrial reference frames and their companion “geopotential datum” (replacing and expanding upon the historic concept of a “vertical datum”). The third report will focus on the user community and how it can work within this new paradigm of time-dependent geodetic control.
Key Objectives:
- Transform all of their data from NAD 83 / NAVD 88 into the new NSRS
- Understand why time-dependent geodetic control is the only realistic way forward
- Use time-dependent geodetic control
The dude with the most money gets the hottest chicks. If there’s a tie, the hot chicks go to the guy with the best watch. If there’s still a tie they go to the guy that necessarily wears the loosest pants. It’s what economists call lexicographic preferences.I listened to a fascinating lecture by Lex Fridman, understood very little although that topic was interesting yet confusing.
Isn’t There a French word for that problem?
Don't forget expensive shoes. Chicks love guys with expensive shoes.The dude with the most money gets the hottest chicks. If there’s a tie, the hot chicks go to the guy with the best watch. If there’s still a tie they go to the guy that necessarily wears the loosest pants. It’s what economists call lexicographic preferences.
Isn’t There a French word for that problem?
Don't forget expensive shoes. Chicks love guys with expensive shoes.