Those were some great football teams. R.I.P. Franco.Way too young!
Loved the Steelers back in the 70’s.
That was back when guys were tough as nails and hit each other and were allowed to.
And get penalized for it.They still hit each other.
Hard.
And get penalized for it.
?? I've never heard anyone question that famous play. At any rate, Was Franco struggling with illness? Was this kinda expected or no?RIP Franco and God bless his family.
But it was not a catch!
Maybe we should go back to everything is legal so these guys can continue to not be able to wipe their asses in their 50's.
I went back and watched an NFL Films video I used to rent all the time as a kid that had big hits in it. Every single one of them would be illegal now but when you look at how violent they are it’s easy to see why they started outlawing it.They still hit each other.
Hard.
To some degree, playing football is violence.I went back and watched an NFL Films video I used to rent all the time as a kid that had big hits in it. Every single one of them would be illegal now but when you look at how violent they are it’s easy to see why they started outlawing it.
It was Frenchie Fuqua, wasn’t it? And no, I didn’t look it up.No matter how big the hits were, Franco was best known for running out of bounds to avoid them.
I loved those Steelers teams, and I had a Franco's Italian Army t shirt. RIP big guy.
I won a sports bar trivia contest in the 90s by answering this question:
In the famous Steelers play known as the Immaculate Reception, who was the intended target of Terry Bradshaw's pass?
Anyone can look it up these days, but I just knew the answer, and how to pronounce his name.. It wasn't Swann or Stallworth.
Do you have any disputable video evidence, or are you a Cowboy's fan too?RIP Franco and God bless his family.
But it was not a catch!
RaidersDo you have any disputable video evidence, or are you a Cowboy's fan too?
Gotcha. Those games between the Steelers and Raiders in the 70's weren't really games, they were more like battles.Raiders
Aaron Donald would have about 10 sacks a game if he played 50 years ago. Conversely, Jack Ham and other LB/DL wouldn't get past the line of scrimmage in today's game.Or maybe you could be less dramatic. Yes, improvements have been made and will continue to be made, but blocking and tackling in today's game has completely gone to $h!t. You say that they still hit each other hard, but most of the time now when they do, a flag is thrown for blind side block or targeting.
I understand the need to protect players because when I rewatch footage of the games back in the 60's and 70's, it's just plain brutal. I agree that a lot of the rules put into place have helped, but some of the kneejerk reaction rules that are completely subjective like targeting hurt the game as well.
Some people thought it hit the ground when he grabbed it. It’s very close but he does grab it before hitting the ground.?? I've never heard anyone question that famous play. At any rate, Was Franco struggling with illness? Was this kinda expected or no?
Violence was a poor choice of wording.To some degree, playing football is violence.
We can't eliminate violence from football, can we?
In my opinion, we've gone too far with today's rules.
Or maybe you could be less dramatic. Yes, improvements have been made and will continue to be made, but blocking and tackling in today's game has completely gone to $h!t. You say that they still hit each other hard, but most of the time now when they do, a flag is thrown for blind side block or targeting.
I understand the need to protect players because when I rewatch footage of the games back in the 60's and 70's, it's just plain brutal. I agree that a lot of the rules put into place have helped, but some of the kneejerk reaction rules that are completely subjective like targeting hurt the game as well.