Rattler's Eligibility Status?

Beamersits2peepee

New member
Nov 26, 2023
7
1
3
Serious question. What's his status? Is he available to come back next year? As a Clemson fan, I hope not. He's a great QB. He's definitely the best I've seen at Carolina. Kid is a baller
 
  • Like
Reactions: kidrobinski

Cocky99

Well-known member
Jan 27, 2022
574
503
93
I think he has a year of eligibility left, but I will be shocked if he stays another season. He is probably going to the NFL, XFL or CFL.

Regardless of what he decides- Rattler will go down as one of my all time favorite QBs who played here.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Beamersits2peepee

CWW

Joined Dec 2, 2013
Feb 1, 2022
461
473
63
Why does this site accept Clemson fans? Why accept a person who joins the day after CU wins and goes by “Beamersits2peepee?” Tiger Net does not allow Carolina fans. Just curious why we accept their fans.
 

Beanerball

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2023
696
515
93
Nope, Seller’s is a stud so not worried there. Rattler can come back. Assuming he’ll go right to edge to judge his stock before jumping to the pros. Don’t know if another season with us does him any good, he should move on. If he does come back, lucky for us, kid is a baller. We would have lost more games without him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kidrobinski

Cocky99

Well-known member
Jan 27, 2022
574
503
93
I know Reno is a commit and haven't seen his film. Are y'all targeting any portal QB's

I think we will be good at QB with Sellers. So probably no need to recruit the portal for a starting QB imo

I’m worried about other positions!
 
Last edited:

Beamersits2peepee

New member
Nov 26, 2023
7
1
3
Why does this site accept Clemson fans? Why accept a person who joins the day after CU wins and goes by “Beamersits2peepee?” Tiger Net does not allow Carolina fans. Just curious why

If Rattler leaves, I think we will be good at QB with Sellers. So probably no need to recruit the portal for a starting QB. It’s other positions that I’m worried about! lol
I haven't seen Sellers play or his film. I know Rattler was a stud and will be hard to replace. You have some dudes for your OL coming in this class though. They'll be interesting to see
 

CWW

Joined Dec 2, 2013
Feb 1, 2022
461
473
63
I think we will be good at QB with Sellers. So probably no need to recruit the portal for a starting QB imo

I’m worried about other positions!
The fellow you are conversing with…calls Carolina fans…shamecocks. Enjoy your new friend.
 

Beamersits2peepee

New member
Nov 26, 2023
7
1
3
The fellow you are conversing with…calls Carolina fans…shamecocks. Enjoy your new friend.
Bro... every one of my buddies are carolina fans. They call me tater, moo u, cult member, etc. It's part of the deal. It's college football, not that serious
 

Deleted11512

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2023
4,985
3,954
113
I know Reno is a commit and haven't seen his film. Are y'all targeting any portal QB's
I don’t see us going after any portal QBs. I think the staff is sold on Sellers. Hard to fault them. Seems like every time the guy has stepped on the field it’s either a TD or explosive play.

Reno has a ton of potential too. If we do pick up a portal QB it would probably be a grad transfer guy just to add depth and experience.
 

Deleted11512

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2023
4,985
3,954
113
I haven't seen Sellers play or his film. I know Rattler was a stud and will be hard to replace. You have some dudes for your OL coming in this class though. They'll be interesting to see
A couple of plays from this year. Also had a perfect back shoulder TD to Harbor. Muschamp ignored the OL. Beamer has had to start from scratch.



 

Yard_Pimps

Well-known member
Jul 11, 2022
1,050
557
113
Why does this site accept Clemson fans? Why accept a person who joins the day after CU wins and goes by “Beamersits2peepee?” Tiger Net does not allow Carolina fans. Just curious why we accept their fans.
You do realize you can subscribe to be able to see every message board right? It’s part of it.
 

CWW

Joined Dec 2, 2013
Feb 1, 2022
461
473
63
You do realize you can subscribe to be able to see every message board right? It’s part of it.
So, it is open to ALL fan bases joining our site? I guess when it was put on this site it became public. No, I didn’t realize that. I thought the administer screened folks. Thanks!
 
Last edited:

Beamersits2peepee

New member
Nov 26, 2023
7
1
3
A couple of plays from this year. Also had a perfect back shoulder TD to Harbor. Muschamp ignored the OL. Beamer has had to start from scratch.




That was a beautiful ball. Who was that receiver? My son was a receiver at Northwestern in Rock Hill and played with a kid that committed to y'all. I hated that Clemson didn't recruit him, Elijah Caldwell I think. He progressing any?
 

Deleted11512

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2023
4,985
3,954
113
That was a beautiful ball. Who was that receiver? My son was a receiver at Northwestern in Rock Hill and played with a kid that committed to y'all. I hated that Clemson didn't recruit him, Elijah Caldwell I think. He progressing any?
That was Tyshawn Russell...another true freshman.

Yeah, that's him. We had some good reports coming out of spring camp on him. Good looking player, just needs to continue developing. I think he'll get a shot next year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beamersits2peepee

KingWard

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2022
6,887
7,218
113
A couple of plays from this year. Also had a perfect back shoulder TD to Harbor. Muschamp ignored the OL. Beamer has had to start from scratch.




All that's telling me is that Beamer has been ineffective in the portal when it comes to the OL.
 

Lurker123

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2022
3,555
3,071
113
Muschamp ignored the OL. Beamer has had to start from scratch.

My memory is admittedly fuzzy, but we had better OL's under Muschamp, right? Didn't we have a back lead the SEC in rushing one year?

I'm not sold on using Muschamp as an excuse for this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KingWard

KingWard

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2022
6,887
7,218
113
My memory is admittedly fuzzy, but we had better OL's under Muschamp, right? Didn't we have a back lead the SEC in rushing one year?

I'm not sold on using Muschamp as an excuse for this.
Any excuse from the previous regime is worn out by now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lurker123

Big JC

Well-known member
May 12, 2023
1,240
905
113
My memory is admittedly fuzzy, but we had better OL's under Muschamp, right? Didn't we have a back lead the SEC in rushing one year?

I'm not sold on using Muschamp as an excuse for this.
You should know that every shortcoming in Carolina football is the fault of the previous coach. The same coach who was lauded at the beginning of his last season as the "right guy to get us there, he just needs time to get his players and system in place". When Beamer is gone, he will suddenly be the worst coach in the history of college football.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lurker123

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,149
12,144
113
You should know that every shortcoming in Carolina football is the fault of the previous coach. The same coach who was lauded at the beginning of his last season as the "right guy to get us there, he just needs time to get his players and system in place". When Beamer is gone, he will suddenly be the worst coach in the history of college football.

Just like politics. Folks who don't like a coach will credit all his success to the previous coach's player and all his failures to him. Folks who do like a coach will blame all his failures on the previous coach and credit him for of his success.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lurker123

Deleted11512

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2023
4,985
3,954
113
My memory is admittedly fuzzy, but we had better OL's under Muschamp, right? Didn't we have a back lead the SEC in rushing one year?

I'm not sold on using Muschamp as an excuse for this.
They were better than this year's, yeah. But they weren't good by any stretch. Technically yes, Kevin Harris lead the SEC in rushing yds/game during the COVID year.
 

Deleted11512

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2023
4,985
3,954
113
All that's telling me is that Beamer has been ineffective in the portal when it comes to the OL.
I wouldn't disagree, but had he known he would have 12 guys go down he probably would have been more urgent about it.
 

Deleted11512

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2023
4,985
3,954
113
It's a physical league.
Yeah, I would agree he could have done better in the portal. Nick G has been pretty good. But Fugar was a whiff. I'm sure they were enamored with his size and thought he had time to develop. But as it worked out, he was thrown right into the fire.