is one of the most demoralizing things as a fan. There's a rumor that David Turner might retire but why not announce that now. I'm just shaking my head on the approach we are taking.
If they announce DT is leaving we lose our JUCO connection. C'mon now. You know we are mining that and the directional schools for impact DL. Eta I hate piling on DT but get serious. Imo we are not bad at LB and safety. Need a CB probly. I don't have any confidence these juco DL are gonna make an impact against the much better SEC linemen. Am I right ? That is the #1 need. And obviously now another QB since we screwed that whole situation upis one of the most demoralizing things as a fan. There's a rumor that David Turner might retire but why not announce that now. I'm just shaking my head on the approach we are taking.
Get Hutzler better players.is one of the most demoralizing things as a fan. There's a rumor that David Turner might retire but why not announce that now. I'm just shaking my head on the approach we are taking.
I want to laugh but there’s a lot of M-State in that parenthetical.Can't announce the new DL coach until Oklahoma finishes their bowl game.
(it will be one of their GAs)
It's like we're not even trying.
Literally defies any logic or reason. There's likely not a wetter blanket you could toss on the end of this season and the beginning of the next. <-I tossed the "likely" in because we are MSU...is one of the most demoralizing things as a fan. There's a rumor that David Turner might retire but why not announce that now. I'm just shaking my head on the approach we are taking.
I'm just shaking my head on the approach we are taking.
That is absolutely the approach they are taking, and the narrative they are building. Dumpster fire, no foundation, 3-year rebuild, we know better, execution, etc. etc. etc. And our fanbase has lapped that up just like they did when Croom took over for Jackie. And just like back then, the 'better players' never came. The players we had at the end of Croom were about like the players we had at the end of Jackie. We all understand our recruiting limitations here, it's no secret, no magic wand.Get Hutzler better players.
I think this may be part of it. I doubt their refusing to pony up to fire Hutzler, but I doubt they're pushing it. We had a moron negotiate Hutzler's deal and over pay somebody with no experience when we should have been hiring somebody with DC experience. If we pony up a couple of million dollars to fire him, we're then going to have to overpay somebody to come to a dumpster fire, and we'd have somebody untrustworthy making the DC hire and then somebody incompetent negotiating the contract, and we'd very likely have to be paying a buyout to terminate that deal along with Lebby's in two years at most, maybe one.Is there money available to fire/hire or are Lebby/Selmon being told to lie in their bed and make it work? Feels like most every staff hire in the football program has been a head scratcher. The folks writing checks may simply smell a turd and don't feel like giving it more money until there are people around that know how to make good hires.
bingo. This is way it hasn't bothered me to keep Hutz. Let him and Lebby have every opportunity to succeed. When they don't.... can them; 11/25.I think this may be part of it. I doubt their refusing to pony up to fire Hutzler, but I doubt they're pushing it. We had a moron negotiate Hutzler's deal and over pay somebody with no experience when we should have been hiring somebody with DC experience. If we pony up a couple of million dollars to fire him, we're then going to have to overpay somebody to come to a dumpster fire, and we'd have somebody untrustworthy making the DC hire and then somebody incompetent negotiating the contract, and we'd very likely have to be paying a buyout to terminate that deal along with Lebby's in two years at most, maybe one.
Save that powder for NIL and see if Lebby and Hutzler can surprise people this year. Probably wont', but it will be probably $3M more available to help fix the program after this year.
I think there is a lot of truth in that. I'd like to believe Lebby will let this play out knowing he's potentially safe because his offense will at least move the ball. Then after next season, we can go after a seasoned DC with the money we saved on not firing CH. I know that's wishful thinking, but whatever...I think this may be part of it. I doubt their refusing to pony up to fire Hutzler, but I doubt they're pushing it. We had a moron negotiate Hutzler's deal and over pay somebody with no experience when we should have been hiring somebody with DC experience. If we pony up a couple of million dollars to fire him, we're then going to have to overpay somebody to come to a dumpster fire, and we'd have somebody untrustworthy making the DC hire and then somebody incompetent negotiating the contract, and we'd very likely have to be paying a buyout to terminate that deal along with Lebby's in two years at most, maybe one.
Save that powder for NIL and see if Lebby and Hutzler can surprise people this year. Probably wont', but it will be probably $3M more available to help fix the program after this year.
Also - this is conspiracy theory - but now that Mullen is warm on coaching again, I could see the money guys saving up on package to get him to Starkville if it looks like he's performing well at UNLV. Even if there are boosters that didn't like him, by this point they have to admire the fact he had such a long run of performance we all are wishing for right now. It also would make it easier to get talent here. Easy to sell a story that Mullen can win here since he has. Lebby? It's a gamble at best. Maybe that even tightens up NIL funds for Lebby right now if they feel there a good possibility in a 1-2 year no brainer replacement? Is that fair to Lebby? Not at all but that's how the world works.I think this may be part of it. I doubt their refusing to pony up to fire Hutzler, but I doubt they're pushing it. We had a moron negotiate Hutzler's deal and over pay somebody with no experience when we should have been hiring somebody with DC experience. If we pony up a couple of million dollars to fire him, we're then going to have to overpay somebody to come to a dumpster fire, and we'd have somebody untrustworthy making the DC hire and then somebody incompetent negotiating the contract, and we'd very likely have to be paying a buyout to terminate that deal along with Lebby's in two years at most, maybe one.
Save that powder for NIL and see if Lebby and Hutzler can surprise people this year. Probably wont', but it will be probably $3M more available to help fix the program after this year.
Unfortunately, this is EXACTLY what I think will happen. Selmon will still be in charge, since we don't have the stones to fire him. Historical context can help predict the future. And because we'll get better....hard not too. May go 3-9 or 4-8, but overall the thing still won't work. But if we lose to USM.....eek, but maybe that expedites things. But I don't know if I want to sacrifice that much just to shed Lebby. That's a big, black mark not felt by our fanbase since in almost 40 years and I think we've forgotten how bad it sucks. Remember when they swept us in baseball???? Multiply it by a thousand. At least we got revenge at the end of the year.I think there is a lot of truth in that. I'd like to believe Lebby will let this play out knowing he's potentially safe because his offense will at least move the ball. Then after next season, we can go after a seasoned DC with the money we saved on not firing CH. I know that's wishful thinking, but whatever...
I don't think our money guys are that organized or planning anything strategic. Just a day by day thing. Remember, these guys tried to fire Mullen in 2013.Also - this is conspiracy theory - but now that Mullen is warm on coaching again, I could see the money guys saving up on package to get him to Starkville if it looks like he's performing well at UNLV. Even if there are boosters that didn't like him, by this point they have to admire the fact he had such a long run of performance we all are wishing for right now. It also would make it easier to get talent here. Easy to sell a story that Mullen can win here since he has. Lebby? It's a gamble at best. Maybe that even tightens up NIL funds for Lebby right now if they feel there a good possibility in a 1-2 year no brainer replacement? Is that fair to Lebby? Not at all but that's how the world works.
Maybe. I suspect that someone in the room wanted a year of no to little turnover in the staff. Absolutely wrong year to do it but that is my theory.I have a theory on that…. I think it’s Lebby trying to buy himself more time. When we suck again next year he can blame his staff and fire them then. And our slow to react administration will probably give him a Year 3.
Things are so bizarre and upside down right now in our program there must be a reason. Could this be the reason (saving money to see what Mullen does so we can bring him back)? It's as plausible a reason as any other.Also - this is conspiracy theory - but now that Mullen is warm on coaching again, I could see the money guys saving up on package to get him to Starkville if it looks like he's performing well at UNLV. Even if there are boosters that didn't like him, by this point they have to admire the fact he had such a long run of performance we all are wishing for right now. It also would make it easier to get talent here. Easy to sell a story that Mullen can win here since he has. Lebby? It's a gamble at best. Maybe that even tightens up NIL funds for Lebby right now if they feel there a good possibility in a 1-2 year no brainer replacement? Is that fair to Lebby? Not at all but that's how the world works.
We couldn't lure him out of retirement, but I know our defense (and defensive recruiting) would improve immediately if we could.We need to get Ed O on the staff to show us how it's done. Not even kidding
Cigar boys aren't gonna put up w/another terrible year and loss in EB. Lebby will be 2 and done and Salmon gone with himI have a theory on that…. I think it’s Lebby trying to buy himself more time. When we suck again next year he can blame his staff and fire them then. And our slow to react administration will probably give him a Year 3.
This was me when we first hired Lebby. I knew it wasn’t going to work. I’ve said that from the beginning. The reason is that schematically trying to do things similar to everyone else, but with less money and common schemed talent, is never going to work here. It never has. Except with some of Jackie’s offenses, but that’s only because they were paired with and complimented an extremely niche less common defense approach especially with Dunn. We’ve got to do things differently guys or you’re just going to be in this never ending hamster wheel. It’s insane to keep hiring people who try to do common based schemes on both sides of the ball here at State.I'm just shaking my head on the approach we are taking.