As if what anyone wants matters.From this report, I would rather have NCSU /VT than Clemson/FSU...
Let Clemson and FSU go to the Big12....
Agree. Can see the B1G taking UNC and Virginia and, maybe, GaTech but not Miami....think they would add Oregon and Washington before GaTech or Miami.Received as information, but probably more in the realm of speculation. This actually originates with some site out of West Virginia.
Would guess UNCs and UVAs decision would also have to include the research funds controlled by the BTAA which is around $1B annually.....it may not be solely an athletic decision.It still begs the question...which would be better for the SEC? FSU/Clemson or NCSU/VT
People say the SEC may want the NC market...well Carolina does well in the Western NC/Charlotte and around Wilmington. I would say the only market where would not have a big draw would be the Triangle and Greensboro...there's where NCSU and VT would come in. Plus VT would add the Tidewater, Richmond and DC areas. FSU and Clemson does nothing for the SEC in terms of TV market share...
On the UNC sites, it's running about 50/50 for the SEC vs B10...I can't imagine UNC vs. Washington would be a big draw compared to NCSU vs Texas/Bama/UGA/us... For UNC fans wanting to travel to Madison or Minneapolis in the winter time, it's brutal...I know, I've been to Minneapolis in the winter.
Well, we've been through this exercise before. As far as I'm concerned all of this is hokum until proven otherwise. It's obvious that the SEC is more intent on contiguous growth than the B1G. In that regard, UPC and Florida State could get in. But I still maintain that North Carolina is the most desirable prize of the ACC. UVA, Va. Tech, and N.C State combined do not amount to the cachet of UNC. Wind up with those while UNC goes to the B1G and you have LOST the race.It still begs the question...which would be better for the SEC? FSU/Clemson or NCSU/VT
People say the SEC may want the NC market...well Carolina does well in the Western NC/Charlotte and around Wilmington. I would say the only market where would not have a big draw would be the Triangle and Greensboro...there's where NCSU and VT would come in. Plus VT would add the Tidewater, Richmond and DC areas. FSU and Clemson does nothing for the SEC in terms of TV market share...
On the UNC sites, it's running about 50/50 for the SEC vs B10...I can't imagine UNC vs. Washington would be a big draw compared to NCSU vs Texas/Bama/UGA/us... For UNC fans wanting to travel to Madison or Minneapolis in the winter time, it's brutal...I know, I've been to Minneapolis in the winter.
Exactly. I'm out until something really happens. I mean, the Big 10 is just now hiring a new commissioner, as in this week. Probably hasn't even moved into his office yet. I will say this, though: on the surface, it is a home run hire, a man who was a TV executive and worked with a couple of networks; he knows his way around the wheeling and dealing that will drive expansion when it comes. Sankey might have found his match.
The SEC has never done anything intentionally to "bail out" a school. Altruism ain't got nothing to do with it.Oh hell no - let them all rot in the ACC. SEC has enough teams. Do not bail them out!!
They qualify under their academic criteria…the question is do they fit their athletic criteria, especially if the B1G gets UNC (who would be the biggest get in the ACC).What about Duke? Wouldn't Duke be a fit for the B1G?
Cracks me up that anyone thinks the SEC would want NC State over Clemson or FSU.
Funnier to me that anyone would THINK the SEC would do that. If it ain't about money for all, they won't be doing it.It's even funnier that anyone in the SEC would want to throw FSU and/or CU a lifeline.
It's even funnier that anyone in the SEC would want to throw FSU and/or CU a lifeline.
ESPN would have to throw a financial lifeline to clemson and FSU. AND ESPN would have to also throw more money to the SEC so as not to financially harm the rest of the conference by taking them in. The Magic Kingdom is not printing cash right now. In fact, they began laying off employees several weeks ago. How feasible is all this? I don't know.Grant of rights says hello
They don't need lifelines.
They'll be fine.
With the size of Clemson's fanbase, it might as well be. They have few die-hards and few alumni. They draw a lot of eyes because they've been good, I think they're primed to be bad and if they don't stay dominant indefinitely then they won't be an asset indefinitely.The SEC has never done anything intentionally to "bail out" a school. Altruism ain't got nothing to do with it.
It probably won't kill it; it could definitely ruin it, though.Greed is going to kill college football
If the SEC is getting Oklahoma and Texas what the heck would they need Clemson and FSU for? Screw em.They don't need lifelines. They'll be fine. And, please take note of @KingWard previous two posts. This is ALL business. Not charity. The SEC is going to bring in teams the strengthen the bottom line for the SEC. That's Clemson and FSU. Not NC State or VA Tech or whoever else.
Schools, not teams. Otherwise, spot on.They don't need lifelines. They'll be fine. And, please take note of @KingWard previous two posts. This is ALL business. Not charity. The SEC is going to bring in teams the strengthen the bottom line for the SEC. That's Clemson and FSU. Not NC State or VA Tech or whoever else.
Just reality.If the SEC is getting Oklahoma and Texas what the heck would they need Clemson and FSU for? Screw em.
NoThey absolutely need a lifeline.
Not if they stay in the ACC.
Economics are your friend.
What does FSU or Clemson bring to the conference? VT then either NCSU or UNC bring two new TV markets, while Clemson nor FSU bring new markets.Cracks me up that anyone thinks the SEC would want NC State over Clemson or FSU.
Good branding and rivalries.What does FSU or Clemson bring to the conference? VT then either NCSU or UNC bring two new TV markets, while Clemson nor FSU bring new markets.
If the article in question has any validity (which I. doubt), then the GOR would not be a factor, since all teams would be leaving.Grant of rights says hello
I too question the validity of the article. The West Virginia folks would like nothing better than for that to happen in order to have conference members nearby. And what about Duke, not to mention Wake Forest? Duke is a basketball rival of UNC. Would the North Carolina legislature look kindly on them being homeless?If the article in question has any validity (which I. doubt), then the GOR would not be a factor, since all teams would be leaving.
They have been the giant in a kiddie pool. The branding the SEC already has is not improved by their presence. Both would immediately step back dramatically with actual competition.Good branding and rivalries.
If and this is a very big If, there were serious news about expansion/realignment there would perhaps be an announcement, but no actual movement for at least 18-24 months.I too question the validity of the article. The West Virginia folks would like nothing better than for that to happen in order to have conference members nearby. And what about Duke, not to mention Wake Forest? Duke is a basketball rival of UNC. Would the North Carolina legislature look kindly on them being homeless?
I will add that if expansion/realignment was to happen, it will happen this summer.
Good point....I've always wondered if UNC and Duke were a pact deal wherein if you take one, you must take the other. They have for a long time seemed attached to each other.I too question the validity of the article. The West Virginia folks would like nothing better than for that to happen in order to have conference members nearby. And what about Duke, not to mention Wake Forest? Duke is a basketball rival of UNC. Would the North Carolina legislature look kindly on them being homeless?
I will add that if expansion/realignment was to happen, it will happen this summer.