It all depends. Let’s see. We’ve all seen Carolina teams play to the level of their competition. Competing with teams we really didn’t have business competing with and then struggling with teams we shouldn’t struggle with. Time will tell if that’s what was going on today or if this team is as good as we saw.6 wins? I saw a team that can compete with every team on our schedule. Being happy with just 6 wins is a low bar for this team in my opinion.
After 3 games that defense has proven that they are as good as anyone in college football. That alone should keep them in every game.It all depends. Let’s see. We’ve all seen Carolina teams play to the level of their competition. Competing with teams we really didn’t have business competing with and then struggling with teams we shouldn’t struggle with. Time will tell if that’s what was going on today or if this team is as good as we saw.
Bama is the only team on our schedule that I’m skeptical we can play with. LSU is one of the better teams we face and it felt like every big play we made was called back by penalty and we were still kicking a FG to tie at the end without Sellers playing any in the second half6 wins? I saw a team that can compete with every team on our schedule. Being happy with just 6 wins is a low bar for this team in my opinion.
The Ole Miss offense is so explosive. LSU had 400 yards and 36 points. Ole Miss is good for that at a minimum.Bama is the only team on our schedule that I’m skeptical we can play with. LSU is one of the better teams we face and it felt like every big play we made was called back by penalty and we were still kicking a FG to tie at the end without Sellers playing any in the second half
I don't think Ole Miss can protect their QB as well as LSU did and Ole Miss hasn't played a contested game yet.The Ole Miss offense is so explosive. LSU had 400 yards and 36 points. Ole Miss is good for that at a minimum.
Ole Miss 23 Wake 6 start 3rd qtrThe Ole Miss offense is so explosive. LSU had 400 yards and 36 points. Ole Miss is good for that at a minimum.
6 wins? I saw a team that can compete with every team on our schedule. Being happy with just 6 wins is a low bar for this team in my opinion.
He said he is fine in the post-game press conference.So no one knows the status of Sellers as yet?
He said he is fine in the post-game press conference.
So did I and Ive been criical of Beamer. We have a 9 win defense for sure. If the offense can hold its own, like today and 2nd half of UK game, we can win 7-9 games. Alabama is out of our reach this year. But honestly if we are healthy I think we have the ability to beat anyone else on the schedule. We wont obviously but assuming we beat Akron Vamdy and Wofford, I could see us pulling 2-3 more wins out.6 wins? I saw a team that can compete with every team on our schedule. Being happy with just 6 wins is a low bar for this team in my opinion.
Agree. LSU has first rounders at both OTs. Best OL we will see all yearI don't think Ole Miss can protect their QB as well as LSU did and Ole Miss hasn't played a contested game yet.
I didnt say id be happy. But yes, with him i think we have a chance to win 6.
I've seen us take moral victories and extrapolate subsequent wins WAY too often to continue to bet on it.
All I can think is they were told its not that bad, but, making it worse would make it a LOT worse and may lose him all year. Beamer may have chosen the long game, knowing we can win 7/8 games with him, but knowing we would likely lose today without him.Im holding my breath waiting to hear the dreaded "high ankle sprain".
I have to wondsr though, if he was fine, why not play? Ashford leaves us one dimensional, a stationary Sellers can at least give us a passing game.
This was my thought as well. As close as we were to winning this thing you just can’t sacrifice the season for it.All I can think is they were told its not that bad, but, making it worse would make it a LOT worse and may lose him all year. Beamer may have chosen the long game, knowing we can win 7/8 games with him, but knowing we would likely lose today without him.
Yep if thats what happened he made the right call, as tempting as it must have been. Damn this loss is gonna be a memorable one around hereThis was my thought as well. As close as we were to winning this thing you just can’t sacrifice the season for it.
All I can think is they were told its not that bad, but, making it worse would make it a LOT worse and may lose him all year. Beamer may have chosen the long game, knowing we can win 7/8 games with him, but knowing we would likely lose today without him.
Dude, they’ll run us off our own field if Sellers doesn’t play. They’ll be a double digit fav even if he does play. Kiffin is playing for the UF job at this point.I don't think Ole Miss can protect their QB as well as LSU did and Ole Miss hasn't played a contested game yet.
Yep Ole Miss is legit. We see we must have Sellers healthy to compete w SEC opponentsDude, they’ll run us off our own field if Sellers doesn’t play. They’ll be a double digit fav even if he does play. Kiffin is playing for the UF job at this point.
The UF job is his. He is going to UF because the amount of talent in that state pretty much guarantees a national championship if the Head Coach has excellent offensive coaching skills, which he does. He will make them a Top 15 program next year, which will be his worst team during his UF career. He is Steve Spurrier in the mid-1990s.Dude, they’ll run us off our own field if Sellers doesn’t play. They’ll be a double digit fav even if he does play. Kiffin is playing for the UF job at this point.
Yep.It’s odd that Beamer says he has complete confidence in Ashford to come in and win the game, but when Ashford comes in the game, they obviously have zero confidence in him to pass the ball.
That's what I call "Beamer-speak".It’s odd that Beamer says he has complete confidence in Ashford to come in and win the game, but when Ashford comes in the game, they obviously have zero confidence in him to pass the ball.
That seems troubling to me, given the state of our offense after Sellers left the game. Is he understating the injury or did our coaching staff have the wrong guy out there?Sounds like going to be fine. Sellers said he could have kept playing but understood the decision.
Alabama is not all that!So did I and Ive been criical of Beamer. We have a 9 win defense for sure. If the offense can hold its own, like today and 2nd half of UK game, we can win 7-9 games. Alabama is out of our reach this year. But honestly if we are healthy I think we have the ability to beat anyone else on the schedule. We wont obviously but assuming we beat Akron Vamdy and Wofford, I could see us pulling 2-3 more wins out.
I call BS on the sounds fine part. I don't trust Beams at all when it comes to injuries.Sounds like going to be fine. Sellers said he could have kept playing but understood the decision.
However, having been sidelined with injury in his first 2 SEC games, I hope this isn't a sign of things to come. Some players are just snake bit when it comes to injury.
Don't think Beamer wanted to lose that game.I call BS on the sounds fine part. I don't trust Beams at all when it comes to injuries.
Well, I mean it goes back to do risk additional injury and possibly multiple games down the road to get this one win? Just because he was physically capable of playing doesn’t necessarily mean it was the right thing to do with the long-term in mind. As bad as we wanted to win this game, it would’ve been foolish to play Sellers just to win the game and then lose him for multiple weeks.That seems troubling to me, given the state of our offense after Sellers left the game. Is he understating the injury or did our coaching staff have the wrong guy out there?
So, you're leaning more to the "Sellers understated the injury" theory I mentioned? If so, I think I am too.Well, I mean it goes back to do risk additional injury and possibly multiple games down the road to get this one win? Just because he was physically capable of playing doesn’t necessarily mean it was the right thing to do with the long-term in mind. As bad as we wanted to win this game, it would’ve been foolish to play Sellers just to win the game and then lose him for multiple weeks.
So, you're leaning more to the "Sellers understated the injury" theory I mentioned? If so, I think I am too.
Do you risk the season to win this game?
It does not bode well that he's missed time with injury in his first 2 SEC games.I'm pretty sure Sellers will be hurt again.